RE: Car Depreciates By £630 Per Mile
RE: Car Depreciates By £630 Per Mile
Tuesday 16th October 2007

Car Depreciates By £630 Per Mile

And someone has just snapped it up.



The motor was a 1985 Buckingham which cost around £250,000 to build and had covered just 348 miles in the past 22 years.  

Commissioned by a wealthy enthusiast, it took eight skilled Aston Martin Lagonda craftsmen two years to design and three years to construct.  The car used modern technology but with classically inspired coachwork design finished in two-tone Burgundy and Champagne.  

The ‘gullwing’ rear doors led to an air-conditioned passenger cabin, finished in Champagne leather with rosewood trim and black leather.  The radiator badge, produced by Garrards, the royal jeweller, was in gold and black enamel.  

As a true one-off, the Buckingham has sold at auction for £28,000 – meaning it had cost over £630 per mile in depreciation alone.

Author
Discussion

Fetchez la vache

Original Poster:

5,903 posts

244 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
...and you can see why. it's hideous (IMHO of course).

Goes to show wealth and taste are not always linked rolleyes

sprinter885

11,550 posts

257 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Yeh..but we need more hardcore motoring facts like 0-60, V-Max & will it do "The Ring" !!! smile

tinman0

18,231 posts

270 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Why would someone sell something like this that they had built at huge cost? Why not keep it?

(unless of course the owner is dead and the estate are disposing of it).

Twincam16

27,647 posts

288 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Can you imagine the Stig taking it round the TG test track biggrin

Schnell

26,140 posts

244 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
Can you imagine the Stig taking it round the TG test track biggrin
No.

patmahe

5,919 posts

234 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Quick stick it on the bargain barge thread. Surely merits a mention

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

244 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Reminds me of the Mercedes owner who lost £65,000 in 3 years on his S65 AMG.
£400+ a week, every week, for 3 years.
YIKES!

iluvmercs

7,541 posts

257 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
The Original Advert

The car for sale for a good couple of years, with the same dealer.

I guess a one off car has a limited customer base wink

Darren

mc_blue

2,548 posts

248 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Is it just me who sees the appeal (I guess so). Any other pictures of the car - esp the interior.

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

272 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Why would someone sell something like this that they had built at huge cost? Why not keep it?

(unless of course the owner is dead and the estate are disposing of it).
Well it's only done 385miles so maybe they decided it was crap to drive as well as to look at.

lukeasbury

12 posts

228 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
In the US it would be called a "Pimpmobile".

vinceh

154 posts

258 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Give it a month and this could be Shed of the Week

thefrog

341 posts

249 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Well, I wouldn't like to be a "skilled Aston Martin Lagonda craftsman" on the wages the numbers suggest...

£250,000 / 8 craftsmen / 5 years = £6,250 per year, and that's assuming parts were free !!!

clemens

242 posts

229 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
It's got one of those cool 1980's car phones!! My dad used to have one of those! Brilliant!


clemens

242 posts

229 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
thefrog said:
Well, I wouldn't like to be a "skilled Aston Martin Lagonda craftsman" on the wages the numbers suggest...

£250,000 / 8 craftsmen / 5 years = £6,250 per year, and that's assuming parts were free !!!
These were late 1970's - 1980's salaries. I'd say that was quite reasonable back then!

88v8

120 posts

228 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Good try, but like many 'vintage' replicas, the proportions are wrong because the wheel diameter is too small. This needs at least 18" or 19" wheels, and not with low-profiles.

Double R

872 posts

260 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
for THAT amount of money you can build an Aston Martin DB4 GT or a Zagato replica and still have its value intact smile


mnewlyn

413 posts

281 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
88v8 said:
Good try, but like many 'vintage' replicas, the proportions are wrong because the wheel diameter is too small. This needs at least 18" or 19" wheels, and not with low-profiles.
bow

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

248 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
Serves the original owner right.......

Diverted

56 posts

235 months

Tuesday 16th October 2007
quotequote all
88v8 said:
Good try, but like many 'vintage' replicas, the proportions are wrong because the wheel diameter is too small. This needs at least 18" or 19" wheels, and not with low-profiles.
I disagree, go for polished rims with low-profiles, then you could go straight to Sean Pee Diddly or whoever and flog as an 'Aston' more exclusive than a Bentley. Bling Bling loads more wonga wink