TVR Tuscan
Author
Discussion

jagdpanther

Original Poster:

19,633 posts

250 months

Thursday 18th October 2007
quotequote all
Ive been playing with my new Canon 50mm prime mk2 recently, but find it a little difficult to judge for shooting vehicles...the focus distance and DOF are so different to what Im used to!! Although I am looking forward to some portrait work biggrin

I wanted to share this photo with you and see what you chaps thought



Enjoy smile

joesnow

1,533 posts

258 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
Flippin' love those cars, nice pic, seems to blend into the surroundings.

jagdpanther

Original Poster:

19,633 posts

250 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
It does seem to match the surroundings somewhat smile

Timmy2TARs

656 posts

241 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
Really like that thumbup The focal length looks spot on. Is it 50mm with a full-frame or cropped sensor?

jagdpanther

Original Poster:

19,633 posts

250 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
Timmy2TARs said:
Really like that thumbup The focal length looks spot on. Is it 50mm with a full-frame or cropped sensor?
50mm prime on a EOS10D so I think cropped censor by 1.6x?

Qoda

24 posts

230 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
It looks as though you were on about f8.5 as the o/s front light looks pretty sharp, the front of the roof is beginning to look slightly unsharp, difficult to tell from the reflection, but judged from the wing mirror. But by the time you get to the front of the slate roof it is clearly unsharp. The light looks sort of brightish hazy/cloudy.
I am guessing you shot set on Program/Auto as you did not hint that you made a conscious choice of which F stop to use.
Get a good quality light meter, then you will know exactly what you can do and how to do it.
E.g meter gives f5.6 @ 1/125, but you want full front-to-back clarity, so you choose f16 @ 1/32
depth of field for any particular focal length/fstop combination will always be a mathematic constant. Quality of lens will have an impact, but not on the dof as the quality of the sweet spot will be comparable with the quality of wider range.
The only Canon's with full frame sensors are the 1 & 5. The 10 is definitely smaller.
Enjoy

Andy M

3,755 posts

290 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
Qoda said:
It looks as though you were on about f8.5 as the o/s front light looks pretty sharp, the front of the roof is beginning to look slightly unsharp, difficult to tell from the reflection, but judged from the wing mirror. But by the time you get to the front of the slate roof it is clearly unsharp. The light looks sort of brightish hazy/cloudy.
I am guessing you shot set on Program/Auto as you did not hint that you made a conscious choice of which F stop to use.
Get a good quality light meter, then you will know exactly what you can do and how to do it.
E.g meter gives f5.6 @ 1/125, but you want full front-to-back clarity, so you choose f16 @ 1/32
depth of field for any particular focal length/fstop combination will always be a mathematic constant. Quality of lens will have an impact, but not on the dof as the quality of the sweet spot will be comparable with the quality of wider range.
The only Canon's with full frame sensors are the 1 & 5. The 10 is definitely smaller.
Enjoy
Or, shoot in aperture priority and keep an eye on your histogram - preferably exposing to the right. See: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose...

No need for a lightmeter, the histogram is a better judge of what the camera is capable of.

FWIW I think the shot is compositionally ok, you've done relatively well with the technical side, and the end result has lovely colours and tones smile

I'd possibly recommend using a slightly wider lens. If you get closer in you may get more of a '3D' effect.