tilt and shift photography
Discussion
well...
in a normal lens the plane of focus is fixed parralel with the film/sensor/camera.
movements like tilt and shift allow you to move the plane of focus in order to produce funky results.
check out the links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilt-shift_photograph...
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/t...
enjoy :-)
in a normal lens the plane of focus is fixed parralel with the film/sensor/camera.
movements like tilt and shift allow you to move the plane of focus in order to produce funky results.
check out the links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilt-shift_photograph...
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/t...
enjoy :-)
use as much tilt as possible and then adjust framing with the shift function to keep the verticles verticle.
you can alter where the point of focus is with MF.
great lens for straight photography too as it's nice and sharp. great for buildings...going tpo shoot some automotive with it the week and see what happens.
all shot on 5d 1 sec ish @ F3.5 100 iso BTW
rick.
you can alter where the point of focus is with MF.
great lens for straight photography too as it's nice and sharp. great for buildings...going tpo shoot some automotive with it the week and see what happens.
all shot on 5d 1 sec ish @ F3.5 100 iso BTW
rick.
Scho said:
well...
in a normal lens the plane of focus is fixed parralel with the film/sensor/camera.
movements like tilt and shift allow you to move the plane of focus in order to produce funky results.
check out the links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilt-shift_photograph...
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/t...
enjoy :-)
That Wikipedia article is slightly disingenuous, as tilt and shift lenses are far more widely used to maximise depth of field than to minimise it. The current fashion with the 'miniature' look and minimising depth of field is really only taking a tool designed chiefly with one purpose in mind and using it for another. I'm not that there's anything wrong with that at all, but to understand how it works, you should really understand the Scheimpflug principle for maximising depth of field, and then you'll see that the use of lens movements to minimse it is a just a welcome pictorial side effect. Of course to get the full effect you need a great big view camera. in a normal lens the plane of focus is fixed parralel with the film/sensor/camera.
movements like tilt and shift allow you to move the plane of focus in order to produce funky results.
check out the links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilt-shift_photograph...
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/t...
enjoy :-)

your right. it's only one side of the coin. and a bit of a gimick really...
just sold my sinar P and the rest of my LF gear as well as my car for a house deposit.
some of my large format work is on here: http://rickschofield.co.uk
trying to get away from large format photography and work a bit more freely ;-)
just sold my sinar P and the rest of my LF gear as well as my car for a house deposit.
some of my large format work is on here: http://rickschofield.co.uk
trying to get away from large format photography and work a bit more freely ;-)
Edited by Scho on Monday 29th October 18:48
These Canon T&S lenses are a reasonable compromise for architectural work. I've been using them for a few years since shelving my 5x4/Fuji 680 gear. They are a little limited though and don't offer the same level of movements as the Sinar etc. They are also prone to barrel distortion when working with a subject that is close to the lens. ie a door frame or similar. This needs to be sorted in post production and adds yet more time to the work flow.
A fair amount of the work here is shot using them:
http://www.visualeye.biz/
Cheers Jonathan
A fair amount of the work here is shot using them:
http://www.visualeye.biz/
Cheers Jonathan
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






)