speedo accuracy in an elise?
speedo accuracy in an elise?
Author
Discussion

crackthatoff

Original Poster:

3,314 posts

244 months

Saturday 3rd November 2007
quotequote all
Was doing 83 when I looked at the speedo after passing a little swine in a revenue van on the motorway, there were around 20 of us in the fast lane all driving at the same speed or thereabouts, Place your bets ladies and gentlemen.....
done or no done ?

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Not, they all over-read. You were probably doing less than 80.

wooooody

920 posts

268 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
The villages around here have signs that read and display your speed as you enter the village. The elise is the only car I've been through one in wher 30mph on the clocks = 30mph on the sign. The focus usually reads about 33 for 30 on the sign and the BM reads 41, but it's well and truly fooked.

LotusEater666

187 posts

231 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Perhaps resetting the Stack/Shurlok unit might help...?

J2LOT

70 posts

242 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
30 on my 111R speedo = 27 on GPS and the speed indicator signs,

Ruxpin

324 posts

276 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Speedo is very close to GPS readings on my S1 - 1999

Yee haa!

590 posts

247 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
mine is absolutely bang on the gps (road angel, tom tom and garmin) amazing really as my old mondy and v70 is a good 4-5mph out at motorway speeds

Cino

177 posts

236 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
I just bought a Talex GPS camera detector yesterday and was quite surprised by the difference between the car's (111R) speedo and what the GPS was saying. The manual says that up to 10% difference is normal. That's a lot! 83 would then be 75, well below the 10% + 3 threshold they seem to use. I found that my speedo reads about 3MPH faster than the GPS (which is supposed to be accurate), and slightly more when you are going faster. Also, I noticed that when stationary, my speedo is not reading 0, but about 3 MPH, which would account for the discrepancy. Is it normal for the speedo not to zero at zero? I guess it gives you a small buffer zone for cameras (like setting your watch a couple of minutes forward to arrive on time) as long as you don't then account for that and drive at 33 in a 30 zone etc.

The Talex (Lite) unit seems good, and cheap at £70, but does alert you to a lot of possible mobile sites when 9 times out of 10 they are not there, but better to be safe than sorry I suppose. Laser detectors as I understand it are/will soon be illegal and only tell you when you're likely to have been caught already. At least you have a chance of reacting with a GPS device although there are a lot of false alarms. The speaker is a bit underpowered when the engine is doing it's thing, but there is a display as well.

thegreenhell

24,365 posts

250 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
My S1 over-reads by 1mph compared to the GPS. This is consistent throughout the speed range.

Paul RN

1,168 posts

245 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Accuracy is always going to be off as its impacted by so many factors. Could be your eyes not reading the needle correctly depending on your seat position, height. Could be worn tyres, incorrect inflated tyres, load in the car, calibration of the display, any changes to rim/tyre sizes etc

*Al*

3,830 posts

253 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
I've found my S1 111S speedo quite accurate also.

ptp170

277 posts

238 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Also very accurate...when speedo reads 100mph...GPS indicates 98mph.



All on a private road I may add smile

Gooby

9,269 posts

265 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
The speedo will differ with tyre wear.

Cino

177 posts

236 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Gooby said:
The speedo will differ with tyre wear.
Will it show a higher or lower speed? My tyres are totally fubared

kambites

71,680 posts

252 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Worn tyres = lower rolling diameter = more turns of the crankshaft per mile driven. So the speedo will read higher as the tyres wear down (or if their are under pressure). The difference in circumference is proportional to the difference in diameter so you're only talking about something like 1%.

Paul RN

1,168 posts

245 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Paul RN said:
Could be worn tyres, incorrect inflated tyres, load in the car, calibration of the display, any changes to rim/tyre sizes etc

LivinLaVidaLotus

1,626 posts

232 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Went through one of those flashy signs yesterday, indicated 30 on speedo, 29 on the sign. I do run my bridgies at the Lotus recommended pressures though - if you're running them below and they are worn down, then you're going to get higher over readings.

DamienCBR

2,037 posts

254 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Speedo and GPS are the closest i have ever seen in any of my cars. About 3mph different.

D

tomtom

4,266 posts

261 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
Ruxpin said:
Speedo is very close to GPS readings on my S1 - 1999
Ditto.

+/- 1 or 2mph up to 100 or so. Reads c132mph at 126mph real speed.