Is this camera worth
Author
Discussion

CosmicMatt

Original Poster:

634 posts

228 months

Tuesday 6th November 2007
quotequote all
£200?

My neighbour has allowed me to use his old DSLR for the past few months under the pretense that I purchase it from him.

The camera is a Canon EOS D30, not knowing much about cameras, other then point and click, is this worth £200?

He wishes to for me to purchase it and the price will include the camera body, batteries, charger and possibly two lenses. I think it is the 18-55mm and 80-200mm.

Any thoughts, I like the camera but am I being ripped off? He can be a little shrewd with his pennies.

Matt

agent006

12,058 posts

295 months

Tuesday 6th November 2007
quotequote all
Just about. Ebay usually has a few of these, so check prices. I'm about to sell mine and am aiming for £170-200.

jagdpanther

19,633 posts

250 months

Tuesday 6th November 2007
quotequote all
Im not sure considering the prices of 10 & 20D's coming down to a bloody good level due to the release of the 40D!

10D's can be had for around £220 now yikes

agent006

12,058 posts

295 months

Tuesday 6th November 2007
quotequote all
Yep, 10d a far better bet. D30's not all that much cop really.

CosmicMatt

Original Poster:

634 posts

228 months

Tuesday 6th November 2007
quotequote all
I'd had a quick scan and didn't believe it was worht the £200 price tag he is asking for it. I've took some decent photos with it, don't get me wrong, but I know there is a brand new Nikon for sale, I think is it a D series?, with an 18-55mm kit for only £200.

Matt

hawkaye

4,505 posts

242 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Sounds like you are getting ripped off mate, canon don't make an EOS D30. You sure it isn't a canon 30D and Nikon D30 chopped together? hehe

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
hawkaye said:
Sounds like you are getting ripped off mate, canon don't make an EOS D30. You sure it isn't a canon 30D and Nikon D30 chopped together? hehe
Correction, they no longer make a D30 - it was an early dSLR.

For the OP - walk away, far better things out there for the money.

miniman

30,189 posts

293 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
hawkaye said:
Sounds like you are getting ripped off mate, canon don't make an EOS D30. You sure it isn't a canon 30D and Nikon D30 chopped together? hehe
They don't anymore, but they used to!

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canond30/

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

271 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
hawkaye said:
Sounds like you are getting ripped off mate, canon don't make an EOS D30.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_eosd30.asp rolleyes

They're a bit rubbish compared to modern machinery. £200? No chance.

Bugger. Too slow TWICE smile

Edited by ThatPhilBrettGuy on Wednesday 7th November 08:50

hawkaye

4,505 posts

242 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
thanks for that lads, you learn something new every day biggrin

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
ThatPhilBrettGuy said:
Bugger. Too slow TWICE smile
hehe

Andy M

3,755 posts

290 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
If you get the two lenses with it, I reckon it's worth a punt.

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Andy M said:
If you get the two lenses with it, I reckon it's worth a punt.
I think it is the 18-55mm and 80-200mm.

18-55 is a kit lens, and can be had for peanuts. Not sure on the 80-200, but I’ve seen a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM for sale for £250 secondhand.

Personally I think there are better deals out there…

bad_roo

5,196 posts

268 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
I've got a D30 and they're decent cameras. Certainly a lot better built than something like a 400D. Bear in mind they're a few years old and the resolution can be bettered by some cameraphones now, but the equivalent to this rig now would be something like a 40D (read big money).

Bodies on their own go for about £100 so £200 with a couple of lenses looks a little optimistic. If you want a really beefy feeling camera, a 10D body would probably be a better buy.

jagdpanther

19,633 posts

250 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Podie said:
Andy M said:
If you get the two lenses with it, I reckon it's worth a punt.
I think it is the 18-55mm and 80-200mm.

18-55 is a kit lens, and can be had for peanuts. Not sure on the 80-200, but I’ve seen a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM for sale for £250 secondhand.

Personally I think there are better deals out there…
As my friend recommended to me when faced with a 300D with about 3 lenses or a 10D with none....go for the 10D!!

The EOS 10D can now be had for around £220 and its a cracking camera, put another £60 towards and get yourself the Canon 50mm Prime F1.8 mk2 lens...its a good walkabout lens, is pin sharp and creates a lovely feel to the shots. Buy new lenses when you have the funds yes

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Don't be afraid of 2nd hand equipment either... we've bought a few bits of used equipment and got a lot more for our money as a result.

In all cases you'd be hard pushed to know they were second hand at all... smile

Scho

2,479 posts

234 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
bad_roo said:
Bear in mind they're a few years old and the resolution can be bettered by some cameraphones now,
don't get blagged by the resolution race....camera phones and compacts in general have loads moremegapixels than thier lenses can actually resolve. it's all a big marketing gimick.

a DLSR even with 'el cheapo' lenses will produce FAR superior lenses.

the only thing that would put me off buying an older or budget camera is the small sensor and the exessive DOF and cropping caused by it.

in my experience commercial clients have been more than happy with images from my old 10D

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Biggest difference between the D30 are more modern cameras will be the autofocus. TBH a 300D will probably outperform the old D30...

jagdpanther

19,633 posts

250 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Scho said:
bad_roo said:
Bear in mind they're a few years old and the resolution can be bettered by some cameraphones now,
don't get blagged by the resolution race....camera phones and compacts in general have loads moremegapixels than thier lenses can actually resolve. it's all a big marketing gimick.

a DLSR even with 'el cheapo' lenses will produce FAR superior lenses.

the only thing that would put me off buying an older or budget camera is the small sensor and the exessive DOF and cropping caused by it.

in my experience commercial clients have been more than happy with images from my old 10D
Exactly

A friend of a friend has a 1D mk2 and a 10D as a backup camera...funny thing is that he prefers the 10D and sells shedloads of images taken on the 10D!!!!

The key is buying a good camera, but a bunch of shithot lenses yes

MonkeyHanger

9,267 posts

273 months

Wednesday 7th November 2007
quotequote all
Forget the D30, it's old and very slow in comparison to anything from the last 3 years or so.

Save some more cash and find a good used 20D smile