Talivan or Taliban...the result was almost the same!!
Talivan or Taliban...the result was almost the same!!
Author
Discussion

XMG5

Original Poster:

1,082 posts

258 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Two traffic patrol officers from North Berwick were involved in an unusual incident while checking for speeding motorists on the A1 Great North Road. One of the officers used a hand-held radar device to
check the speed of a vehicle approaching over the crest of a hill, and was surprised when the speed was recorded at over 300 mph. Their radar suddenly stopped working and the officers were not able to reset it.
Just then a deafening roar over the treetops revealed that the radar had in fact latched on to a NATO Tornado fighter jet which was engaged in a
low-flying exercise over the Border district, approaching from the North Sea.
Back at police headquarters the chief constable fired off a stiff complaint to the RAF Liaison office.
Back came the reply in true laconic RAF style:
"Thank you for your message, which allows us to complete the file on this incident. You may be interested to know that the tactical computer
in the Tornado had detected the presence of, and subsequently locked onto, your hostile radar equipment and automatically sent a jamming
signal back to it. Furthermore, an air-to-ground missile aboard the fully-armed aircraft had also automatically locked onto your equipment.
Fortunately the pilot flying the Tornado recognized the situation for what it was, quickly responded to the missile systems alert status, and was able to override the automated defence system before the missile was
launched and your hostile radar installation was destroyed!




Good Day..."


pdV6

16,442 posts

292 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
banghead

Bing o

15,184 posts

250 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
I believe that it is written in the ACPO Code that you shouldn't point speed guns at army equipment for this reason..

Would hate to see a scamera get taken out by an Apache gunship helicopter...

Targarama

14,791 posts

314 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Would hate to see a scamera get taken out by an Apache gunship helicopter...
I think this could be a good 'sketch' for a future episode of Top Gear...

Bing o

15,184 posts

250 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Targarama said:
Bing o said:
Would hate to see a scamera get taken out by an Apache gunship helicopter...
I think this could be a good 'sketch' for a future episode of Top Gear...
Sketch infers that it would be set-up, rather do it for real and off a couple of the parasites.

Bibbs

3,754 posts

241 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all

bryan35

1,906 posts

272 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
understand the technicalities, but still believe that the letter could be sent, and recieve that sort of reply!

they do have a sense of humour these chaps!

Negative Creep

26,137 posts

258 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
It's disgraceful flying at that speed. What if a child had stepped out in front of them? And just think of the fluffy bunnies that were killed by the CO2

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

248 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
They actually invented the internet, basically, just so that story could be spread.

Who me ?

7,455 posts

243 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Would hate to see a scamera get taken out by an Apache gunship helicopter...
Have a look at "LAST LAUGH " on the ABD site

markTF

2 posts

250 months

Monday 12th November 2007
quotequote all
As already mentioned, very untrue. Although the pod on the mighty Tonka used to play merry hell with mobile phone reception in the days of the old analogue mobiles (when the scanner in our ops room used to be able to pick up Norfolk weirdos conversations about tractors). The Jags used to bounce flares off the road and over passing cars in Northern Iraq back in the no-fly zone days - if they shook a fist it was 10 points and of you could bounce it over a car and then into one of the many big pictures of Saddam it was a hundred.

RAF Police use an old Skyguard Radar (Captured from the Argies during the Falklands) to check the speed of aircraft in the low flying areas and issue rollockings accordingly to those caught speeding (anything over around 470kts IIRC). I'm sure this is where this myth originated but the 'firing back' bit is pure BS.

Now the one about the pilots driving at night with no lights and using NVGs instead...

skymaster

731 posts

238 months

Tuesday 13th November 2007
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
It's disgraceful flying at that speed. What if a child had stepped out in front of them? And just think of the fluffy bunnies that were killed by the CO2
Yes I agree, given that speed kills (it must be true cos the government say so) maybe we should set 30mph speed limits for aircraft as well.... Will make them safer for sure....