top traffic cop, Med Hughes in court TODAY
top traffic cop, Med Hughes in court TODAY
Author
Discussion

DucatiGary

Original Poster:

7,765 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
  • pulls up a comfy chair*
I bet he doesnt have the balls to say his speed was safe in the conditions he was driving.


take note

http://www.press.webeden.co.uk < nice video here.

"you cant pick and choose which laws you want to abide by"

"…speed limits are set for a purpose, and we are expected to abide by the law…"

med hughes



Edited by DucatiGary on Wednesday 21st November 09:32

EU_Foreigner

2,838 posts

257 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
Wish there was a tv link I could watch ...

Jasandjules

72,681 posts

260 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
It will be nice to hear his defence indeed.

And amazingly he didn't crash either, despite travelling at a speed which meant the deaths of at least 3 children. I mean, the equivalent of what, 105 on a DC with an NSL..

tigger1

8,478 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
Will be very interesting to hear the outcome.

Can somebody post a reminder of what's he's up for?

dan1981

18,128 posts

230 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
he'll not be saying very much at all - he doesn't even have to appear in person......

Hypocritical tosser.

Jasandjules

72,681 posts

260 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
tigger1 said:
Can somebody post a reminder of what's he's up for?
90 in a 60 IIRC.

Country Boy

300 posts

265 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
He'll still get off - they always do. When you're in the trade how can they not let him off? Look at the history - they always get off.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

248 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
Are there any PHers nearby who fancy nipping into the court?

DucatiGary

Original Poster:

7,765 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
lol

I could!

anyone know what time the show begins?

will take me a few hours to get to wrexham . . . . .

DPX

1,027 posts

231 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
I hear that there is a nice chiefs job going down in that area somewhere , perhaps he will go for interview at the same time .

mark69sheer

3,906 posts

233 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
Why do I get a feeling about Max Mosley and Ferrari going on here?

tigger1

8,478 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
DucatiGary said:
lol

I could!

anyone know what time the show begins?

will take me a few hours to get to wrexham . . . . .
Not if you do 90 all the way there....

I can't see him getting a ban.

Interesting article here

dan1981

18,128 posts

230 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
has he been "done" yet?

DucatiGary

Original Poster:

7,765 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
damn, i thought the results where in.

  • top traffic cop gets away with speeding fine since he has above normal experience of steering a desk all day"

DucatiGary

Original Poster:

7,765 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
I also notice a distinct lack of BiB on here today :rubchin:

Edited by DucatiGary on Wednesday 21st November 14:51

Deva Link

26,934 posts

276 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
..been adjourned until Dec 5th (I'm guessing so he can be there in person as they may want to ban him?).

tigger1

8,478 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
..been adjourned until Dec 5th (I'm guessing so he can be there in person as they may want to ban him?).
That's very interesting.

TBH though, if the possible law-change for "double-points" for high speed over the limit comes in, then he is right on the cusp for 6 points (90 in a 60 I think was one of the thresholds), whereas currently a short ban may be in order - or have I got things completely arse about face?

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

248 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
I would imagine it's the second hearing for the intent to disqualify. Although you're normally expected to attend that, in certain circumstances you can be disqualified in your absence. I would imagine the next hearing will qualify for that.

Hopefully the magistrates will at the very least treat him as they would any other road user, and perhaps view his position with ACPO at the time as an aggrevating factor, too.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

276 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
tigger1 said:
Deva Link said:
..been adjourned until Dec 5th (I'm guessing so he can be there in person as they may want to ban him?).
That's very interesting.

TBH though, if the possible law-change for "double-points" for high speed over the limit comes in, then he is right on the cusp for 6 points (90 in a 60 I think was one of the thresholds), whereas currently a short ban may be in order - or have I got things completely arse about face?
Not sure, but I think he's been done for speeding 3? times in the last few years, although I don't know what his current points status is.

SS2.

14,712 posts

269 months

Wednesday 21st November 2007
quotequote all
tigger1 said:
TBH though, if the possible law-change for "double-points" for high speed over the limit comes in, then he is right on the cusp for 6 points (90 in a 60 I think was one of the thresholds), whereas currently a short ban may be in order - or have I got things completely arse about face?
The current Magistrates' sentencing guidelines suggest 4-5 points (no ban) upon conviction for 90 in a 60 limit. Get done for 91 in a 60 and it steps up to 6 points OR a ban of 14-56 days..