I pick up my new EOS 40D in just 2½ weeks!!!
I pick up my new EOS 40D in just 2½ weeks!!!
Author
Discussion

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
After pondering for many weeks on this, I've finally decided to get a lovely EOS 40D to replace my now broken EOS 300D. I need to get the 300D repaired however the fact that my 30)D broke was the real decider to get the 40D.

The best thing is the price in Dubai where i'm off to in just over two weeks. Just €800 or about £550! That's £200 cheaper than anywhere in the UK or here in Austria!

I can't wait....I love Christmas presents to me biggrin

Just need to get a lovely new lens to go with it, but I'm not sure what. Any ideas?

Right now I only have two (18-55mm standard wide angle and 55-200mm narrow Canon lens). I also have a nice 430EX speedlite. Most of the stuff I take photos of is wide angle, but I don't want a fixed lens. I'd a zoom lens....

Edited by beanbag on Thursday 22 November 13:46

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

280 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
beanbag said:
I don't want a fixed lens. I'd like something fixed....
Eh?

May I suggest the 50mm f1.8 prime lens. It's superb and you never get bored of f1.8 biggrin (and best of all, relatively cheap...<£100)

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
beanbag said:
I don't want a fixed lens. I'd a zoom lens....
Eh?

May I suggest the 50mm f1.8 prime lens. It's superb and you never get bored of f1.8 biggrin (and best of all, relatively cheap...<£100)
Bugger.....four things at once never work for me. (I guess that proves I'm male and proud). hehe

beanbags fixed comment now said:
I don't want a fixed lens. I'd a zoom lens....

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

280 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
Ah. Best be ignoring me there, then hehe

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
beanbag said:
After pondering for many weeks on this, I've finally decided to get a lovely EOS 40D to replace my now broken EOS 300D. I need to get the 300D repaired however the fact that my 30)D broke was the real decider to get the 40D.

The best thing is the price in Dubai where i'm off to in just over two weeks. Just €800 or about £550! That's £200 cheaper than anywhere in the UK or here in Austria!

I can't wait....I love Christmas presents to me biggrin

Just need to get a lovely new lens to go with it, but I'm not sure what. Any ideas?

Right now I only have two (18-55mm standard wide angle and 55-200mm narrow Canon lens). I also have a nice 430EX speedlite. Most of the stuff I take photos of is wide angle, but I don't want a fixed lens. I'd a zoom lens....

Edited by beanbag on Thursday 22 November 13:46
Are you looking to replace your 18-55 or go for an ultra-wide ?

For replacements:
Canon 17-40mm f4 L (about £480) - nice wide angle L thats not super-expensive.
Canon 17-55mm f2.8 (about £625) - some people go nuts for these smile

For ultra-wide:
Canon 10-22mm (about £470) - well respected but expensive. Though if you can get one in Dubai..
Sigma 10-20 (about £290) - cheaper option, but some people really rate it. Either way, with HSM and being part of Sigma's EX range, seems a lot of lens for the money smile

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
beanbag said:
After pondering for many weeks on this, I've finally decided to get a lovely EOS 40D to replace my now broken EOS 300D. I need to get the 300D repaired however the fact that my 30)D broke was the real decider to get the 40D.

The best thing is the price in Dubai where i'm off to in just over two weeks. Just €800 or about £550! That's £200 cheaper than anywhere in the UK or here in Austria!

I can't wait....I love Christmas presents to me biggrin

Just need to get a lovely new lens to go with it, but I'm not sure what. Any ideas?

Right now I only have two (18-55mm standard wide angle and 55-200mm narrow Canon lens). I also have a nice 430EX speedlite. Most of the stuff I take photos of is wide angle, but I don't want a fixed lens. I'd a zoom lens....

Edited by beanbag on Thursday 22 November 13:46
Are you looking to replace your 18-55 or go for an ultra-wide ?

For replacements:
Canon 17-40mm f4 L (about £480) - nice wide angle L thats not super-expensive.
Canon 17-55mm f2.8 (about £625) - some people go nuts for these smile

For ultra-wide:
Canon 10-22mm (about £470) - well respected but expensive. Though if you can get one in Dubai..
Sigma 10-20 (about £290) - cheaper option, but some people really rate it. Either way, with HSM and being part of Sigma's EX range, seems a lot of lens for the money smile
More of a replacement for my 18-55. When I finally get the 300D repaired, I'd like to include it with the camera as it'll sell better and fund the new lens smile

The Canon 17-55mm f2.8 looks rather nice and seems to suit the 40D nicely. I'll check out the prices while I'm out in Dubai. I've got three weeks of pure holiday bliss and relaxation so plenty of time to do a little shopping although the list is getting quite long and expensive! hehe

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
beanbag said:
More of a replacement for my 18-55. When I finally get the 300D repaired, I'd like to include it with the camera as it'll sell better and fund the new lens smile

The Canon 17-55mm f2.8 looks rather nice and seems to suit the 40D nicely. I'll check out the prices while I'm out in Dubai. I've got three weeks of pure holiday bliss and relaxation so plenty of time to do a little shopping although the list is getting quite long and expensive! hehe
If thats the sort of area then perhaps you may want to consider :

Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L mk2 (about £1040) - Expensive, but looks lovely smile
Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L (about £770) - Referred to as 'the brick' on some sites, great reputation. Not as wide though...
Canon 24-105mm f4 L (about £650) - Possibly the ideal walk-about lens ? Again, not as wide...

Just a quick fyi: That 17-55 f2.8 is EF-S, so if you were ever to upgrade to a full frame body (how much are 5D's in Dubai ? winkbiggrin) then it wouldn't work.

Cheers.

Edited by flat-planedCrank on Thursday 22 November 17:02

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
beanbag said:
More of a replacement for my 18-55. When I finally get the 300D repaired, I'd like to include it with the camera as it'll sell better and fund the new lens smile

The Canon 17-55mm f2.8 looks rather nice and seems to suit the 40D nicely. I'll check out the prices while I'm out in Dubai. I've got three weeks of pure holiday bliss and relaxation so plenty of time to do a little shopping although the list is getting quite long and expensive! hehe
If thats the sort of area then perhaps you may want to consider :

Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L mk2 (about £1040) - Expensive, but looks lovely smile
Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L (about £770) - Referred to as 'the brick' on some sites, great reputation. Not as wide though...
Canon 24-105mm f4 L (about £650) - Possibly the ideal walk-about lens ? Again, not as wide...

Just a quick fyi: That 17-55 f2.8 is EF-S, so if you were ever to upgrade to a full frame body (how much are 5D's in Dubai ? winkbiggrin) then it wouldn't work.

Cheers.

Edited by flat-planedCrank on Thursday 22 November 17:02
OK...I might need to set a budget here!!! £600 UK price is totally pushing it, so I'll budget about £400 in Dubai AED currency. That's a total of £950 for camera and lens, and I reckon if I buy both at the same time, I'll get a better deal. My aim is £900 for both as a kit. Pushing it? Yup!

My friend bought a 5D recently just before a wedding I went to in Croatia. The 5D is a stunning bit of kit, but the price just is just that bit too much, especially since I have to budget for a lens on top. Maybe for my next SLR. The 300D lasted me 4 years so that's not bad going.

I just hope it doesn't cost too much to fix. I think it's an electrical fault since I heard a rattle inside the body before it died. Maybe something shorted??? It's still a fantastic beginners piece of kit.

JD

3,149 posts

258 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
beanbag said:
More of a replacement for my 18-55. When I finally get the 300D repaired, I'd like to include it with the camera as it'll sell better and fund the new lens smile

The Canon 17-55mm f2.8 looks rather nice and seems to suit the 40D nicely. I'll check out the prices while I'm out in Dubai. I've got three weeks of pure holiday bliss and relaxation so plenty of time to do a little shopping although the list is getting quite long and expensive! hehe
Canon 24-105mm f4 L (about £650) - Possibly the ideal walk-about lens ? Again, not as wide...
To add...

These are £555 on one stop digital and there is £35 cashback from canon, bargain in my eyes for L glass

V6GTO

11,579 posts

272 months

Thursday 22nd November 2007
quotequote all
I heard them being advertised on the radio today (40Ds) and they're giving free on-line photography courses away with them.

Martin.

LotusJas

1,383 posts

261 months

Saturday 24th November 2007
quotequote all
flat-planedCrank said:
you may want to consider :

Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L mk2 (about £1040) - Expensive, but looks lovely smile
Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L (about £770) - Referred to as 'the brick' on some sites, great reputation. Not as wide though...
Canon 24-105mm f4 L (about £650) - Possibly the ideal walk-about lens ? Again, not as wide...

Just a quick fyi: That 17-55 f2.8 is EF-S, so if you were ever to upgrade to a full frame body then it wouldn't work.
I'm getting a 40D this coming week smile

I decided to buy a 24-105 with it. I'll later get a 16-35 as suggested above, along with a 100-400 and a 50mm f1.4 and the 100mm macro.

My reason for this slightly odd lens selection is precisely because I am looking to buy a 5Dii too when it's released, and these lenses will work well across both bodies.

I tried a 24-70 but it's so heavy that it's not really a good walk around lens IMO. The 17-40 looks good, but as I'll use the super-wide indoors a lot, the faster 16-35 is worth the higher price to me.

agent006

12,058 posts

294 months

Saturday 24th November 2007
quotequote all
I have a 24-105L and it's excellent. I got it as a whitebox discount item from Park cameras (i guess it was a demo item). It's good but still leaves me wondering if i'd have been better off with the 24-70L2.8 as the IS isn't much cop and the F4 can be a pain in low light. However i bought it for outdoor stuff so it suits me fine most of the time, but consioder what you'd use it for most.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

233 months

Saturday 24th November 2007
quotequote all
Quinny said:
If you're on a bit of a tight budget, may I recommend the 17-85 IS as a replacement for the standard 18-55yes

I've just bought a SH one off ebay for £220, I know it's not "L" glass, but it's a hell of a step up on the standard lens, and has more range as well.

Ok it may not fit in with your plans for a 5D as its EFS, but you could always sell it and get your money back if you buy right to start withthumbup
I have the 17-85 as well, can't say i'm blown-away by it. The wide end on mine can have soft-corners and significant distortion, but some of that can be remedied by stopping it down a touch. It also seems to have developed significant barrel creep.
On the up side its very fast to focus (ring USM), no rotating front element means that its a step up from the 18-55 if you are using filters.

If you can find it cheap / as part of a kit then imo its a reasnoable deal. For the retail price then i'd also look at the sigma / tamron f2.8 options before making a choice.

If i had the choice then i'd go for the 17-55 f2.8....but then its considerably more money biggrin

Take a look at http://www.fredmiranda.com/ for some lens reviews.


Cheers.

Edited by flat-planedCrank on Saturday 24th November 23:43

hawkaye

4,505 posts

241 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
Congratulations mate, very good choice on the 40D!

I've had a 40D for 2 months now and am loving it (compared to my 350D). I also purchased a 17-40mm recently, and as an all rounder it is superb!

MartinP

1,275 posts

268 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
You won't regret it!

I got my 40D three weeks ago and my previous camera was a 300D too. There is such a difference between the two cameras in terms of the feel and the performance.

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
2 weeks now!!! hehe

I've been looking at the camera shops thoroughly annoying the sales guys. Poor chaps think I'm up for buying the lens and then I tell them I will think about it without buying anything.

So far I've only been able to try one and it's fantastic. The Canon 17-55mm f2.8 which was recommended earlier is so clear and crisp, I'm beginning to wonder why I didn't change earlier.

I tried it with a 400D unfortunately, but it did give me a good feel of the lens. The AF is remarkably fast and the zoom is very smooth however the small ring is a little annoying but I guess you get used to that.

Light entry was excellent and I did take photos with both the standard 17-55mm lens and the better one. You could see straight away under the same ISO's which allowed more detail to hit the light sensor.

I'll want to try a few more, but since it goes nicely with my telescopic lens, this could be the right lens to buy.

........still.....2 weeks is plenty of time to hunt around! hehe

Father Ted

3,069 posts

277 months

Sunday 25th November 2007
quotequote all
I got my 40D 3 weeks ago

a quality camera !

i got it with the 17-85 Ef-s IS & 70-300mm IS lens pack

missus bought me a new lowepro 200 slingshot backpack too!


=

1 happy bunny!

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Monday 26th November 2007
quotequote all
OK....I'm finding this lens shopping harder than I imagined. There's a lot to choose from so perhaps if I can get some feedback to my options, I'd appreciate the help!

Choice 1


Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM - This is a beauty of a lens, with a fixed f stop meaning good in low light and portrait photos. It's also got a reasonable telescopic lens so it's a good "walkaround" lens to have.

I've also got the benefit that it uses the L glass which is apparently much better than the rest of the series, but my biggest concern is that it's really designed for full frame DSLR's like the 5D and above. I'm guessing with the 40D that I am buying, the cropped frame will update the lens to around 28-106mm which is ok in practice, but I've lost a lot of the wide-angle capability which I like to use.

Choice 2


Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM - Another great lens but not much of an upgrade of all roundness on my 17-55 kit lens. You do of course have a fixed f-stop and since it's so low at 2.8, you get excellent light gathering through the lens which means this is great for night time use.

You also get the image stabilisation which is rather nice too and since the f-stop is so low, it can be used for portrait shots with a good depth of field.

It's also an EF-S lens designed for cropped framed sensors like that of the 40D so the range is exactly what it says on the tin.

Choice 3


Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - My last option. This lens gives a much better all round wide angle to telescopic view, but it's f-stop is much higher meaning it won't work so well in low light. It's even higher than my 300D kit lens so even though I have a 430EX flash, I'm worried it might not be so good in my night shots.

Again it's an EF-S lens so perfect for my 40D so this could be a good option.

With regards to price, I'm ok with all these lenses, but I've no idea what to get. As a summary, I like doing night photography and I take a lot of portrait shots but also a lot of sports and action photography during the day in very bright conditions. (Skiing and mountain biking in summer).

Also keep in mind I have a Canon EF 55-200 f/4.5-5.6 II USM lens in my collection, and I'd also like to eventually buy a fixed wide angle lens but not for another 6 months as the camera and this lens are going to wipe me out for a short while!!!! There's also a tripod to buy, but that's another story....

Cheers for any input!

cirks

2,549 posts

313 months

Monday 26th November 2007
quotequote all
beanbag said:
It's also an EF-S lens designed for cropped framed sensors like that of the 40D so the range is exactly what it says on the tin.
Don't get confused by the focal lengths even though it is a EF-S specific lens. The 17-55 is still equivalent to a 27-88mm lens and the 17-85 is equivalent to a 27-136mm lens in 35mm 'speak'. Therefore, the EF-S lenses don't do exactly what they say on the tin!!

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

271 months

Monday 26th November 2007
quotequote all
cirks said:
beanbag said:
It's also an EF-S lens designed for cropped framed sensors like that of the 40D so the range is exactly what it says on the tin.
Don't get confused by the focal lengths even though it is a EF-S specific lens. The 17-55 is still equivalent to a 27-88mm lens and the 17-85 is equivalent to a 27-136mm lens in 35mm 'speak'. Therefore, the EF-S lenses don't do exactly what they say on the tin!!
That confuses the matter a little more, but although the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is clearly the better quality lens, I'm wondering if it's the lens I should have as it's substantially narrower than the other two.

Then I have to take light into consideration, and buying the 17-55mm almost seems like my standard kit lens apart from the quality of course!!!! Maybe I'm being too naive since it still brings numerous benefits including the low, fixed f-stop and better lens glass quality.