Slicks on the road
Author
Discussion

williamball

Original Poster:

4,629 posts

302 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Purely hypotherical, but lets say that a perfectly road legal car goes to a track day with a set of slicks in the boot. For whatever reason [flat road tyre maybe?] he drives home on the slicks with the road tyres in the boot.

Illegal I'm sure, but if he is stopped what's the score re the law? Obviously no tread, so do you get done as if it was worn tyres all round, or is there something else? Fine, points or what?

All purely hypothetical etc....

WB

Alan420

5,618 posts

278 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
You get a fine for a bald tyre. Max £1K I think.

Why doesn't this hyopthetical person just carry a spare tyre like the rest of us?

spnracing

1,554 posts

291 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Err - worse than that. 3 points per illegal tyre = 12 points and a ban.

If you used cut slicks and the cuts were deep enough you could get away with arguing that the cuts were the tread pattern and they deep enough across more than 75% of the tyre. Wouldn't want to try it with plod though.

Back in my younger days I drove a Skoda Estelle rally car from London to Portland Bill and back with a set of (uncut) slicks on. It was dark and stayed dry - and we didn't get stopped. I wouldn't do it again!

williamball

Original Poster:

4,629 posts

302 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Alan420 said:
You get a fine for a bald tyre. Max £1K I think.

Why doesn't this hyopthetical person just carry a spare tyre like the rest of us?


Because there might be a hypothetical track not too far from home, and he might want to know what he risks if he doesn't change tyres at the end of a session and toodles a few hypothetical miles home on slicks.

WB

WillB

237 posts

281 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all

It's not worth the hypothetical risk....

Other WB

tonyrec

3,984 posts

275 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
If youre stopped with 4 bald tyres on the road you will get points,fine and much worse....a PG9 Prohibition (if theres an Authorised Traffic Officer around).
This means that the vehicle will have to be lifted from the scene....new tyres put on...a new MOT and then a trip to the local Nick to get a PG10 form (removal of Prohibition).

BTW. Just started a Thread on PG9s



>> Edited by tonyrec on Thursday 3rd July 15:58

Alan420

5,618 posts

278 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Wow.

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

304 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
williamball said:

Because there might be a hypothetical track not too far from home, and he might want to know what he risks if he doesn't change tyres at the end of a session and toodles a few hypothetical miles home on slicks.

I make that about 15 hypothetical miles

andygo

7,235 posts

275 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
They wouldn't be able to catch you if you were on slicks, and if they did, just say they were fine when you started out this morning, but i've been a long way!

rsvnigel

600 posts

286 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Size Nine Elm said:
I make that about 15 hypothetical miles
His chances of getting caught would depend what direction he was going 15 miles in

Alan420

5,618 posts

278 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
And he would be well buggered if he happened to hit another, hypothetical vehicle, after a tiring day at a hypothetical circuit.

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

304 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
rsvnigel said:


Size Nine Elm said:
I make that about 15 hypothetical miles


His chances of getting caught would depend what direction he was going 15 miles in


Not really. Cameras and Talivans can't spot slicks. And that's all that police have...

(Edited to say, above represents a region, not an adjective describing the police... although...)

>> Edited by Size Nine Elm on Thursday 3rd July 17:13

rsvnigel

600 posts

286 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Size Nine Elm said:
Not really. Cameras and Talivans can't spot slicks. And that's all that police have...
police have a red unmarked vectra and a silver scooby, the vectra seems to stick to the M though.

If he was heading in McNabs direction he'd never see plod, the other way is a very different proposition though.

williamball

Original Poster:

4,629 posts

302 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
Size Nine Elm said:

williamball said:

Because there might be a hypothetical track not too far from home, and he might want to know what he risks if he doesn't change tyres at the end of a session and toodles a few hypothetical miles home on slicks.


I make that about 15 hypothetical miles


Hypothetically, 16 miles using the Mway, or 14 on backroads, so 15 miles would be a good average hypothesis.

I shall tell my friend it sounds like the hypothetical risks outweigh the hypothetical benefit of getting home 20 minutes earlier.

WB

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

304 months

Thursday 3rd July 2003
quotequote all
rsvnigel said:

Size Nine Elm said:
Not really. Cameras and Talivans can't spot slicks. And that's all that police have...

police have a red unmarked vectra and a silver scooby, the vectra seems to stick to the M though.

If he was heading in McNabs direction he'd never see plod, the other way is a very different proposition though.

Hypothetically.

bumpkin

158 posts

275 months

Friday 4th July 2003
quotequote all
before the days of moulded rally slicks they used to cut3 circumferential grooves in the slicks which became the tread - presumably they had to be deep more than 1.6mm deep.

there may be some problems with the wording on the sidewall as well.

Richard C

1,685 posts

277 months

Friday 4th July 2003
quotequote all
There are two basic wordings ' for Competition use .....' and 'for racing purposes....' Generally slicks fall into the latter but rally moulded slicks which have 2 or 3 sets of grooves fall into the former.

Since racing is prohibited then I assume you could be in trouble with ones that said 'for racing purposes....' but there is a grey area covering the former. One is permitted to use tyres ' for Competition use .....' if one is engaged on competition and some competition uses closed public roads ( eg Jim Clark last weekend ) and others use not closed public road for link sections on rallies specifically authorised under the MSA regulations.

The argument is that a competition car or support car is engaged in competition when trevelling to/from ccompetition, garage etc. Using these tyres is not necessarily a construction and use offence provided the depth of grooves is greater than 1.6mm etc.

The ' for Competition use .....' markings exempt these tyres from E marking which is a legal requirement for the sale of tyres NOT their use.

deltaf

6,806 posts

273 months

Friday 4th July 2003
quotequote all
I think this may be what youre after:
www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/catalogue/search.asp?keyword=tyres&CLS=all&brand=all&page=2

The formula two tyre sir?

Don

28,378 posts

304 months

Friday 4th July 2003
quotequote all
I also suspect your friend may hypothetically have a problem should it rain on the hypothetical drive home...

Just spent a day Karting. Karting in the wet with wet tyres was a total laugh....with slicks I did two laps and gave up.....

(I was also getting totally soaked )

Don

28,378 posts

304 months

Friday 4th July 2003
quotequote all
deltaf said:
I think this may be what youre after:
www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/catalogue/search.asp?keyword=tyres&CLS=all&brand=all&page=2

The formula two tyre sir?


Damn clever....now where do I get a reasonably priced set of 18" Sport Design wheels...... : D