Nick Freeman Strikes Again!
Nick Freeman Strikes Again!
Author
Discussion

xxplod

Original Poster:

2,269 posts

275 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/south_yorkshire...

Another "technical glitch" with a camera

Hee hee! Keep up the good work Nick!

anonymous-user

85 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
What were the first 9 points for anyone know, not speeding per chance ?

Could be like the term repeat offender if so eh smile

ypauly

15,137 posts

231 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
how do we get nick freeman a knighthood?

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

275 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Crafty CPS.

Withdrawing before the fight. Will we ever know the technicallity breached?

Not unless we pay £4,000?

dvd

turbobloke

117,509 posts

291 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Agreed, and possibly also crafty mister loophole for taking the disclosure route, as a result he can keep the basis for the acqittal to himself for the next MEP tootling along watching the road not the speedo.

xxplod

Original Poster:

2,269 posts

275 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Wise words DVD. The CPS are as aware of the flaws a Freeman. I'm sure the first 9 points in this case were for speeding (probably similar transgressions) and I'm not defending this MEP. But every case like this shows the cameras in their true light.

Burgmeister

2,206 posts

241 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
I wonder when the general public will get so angry over petty speeding offences that they actually do something?

Hooli

32,278 posts

231 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Burgmeister said:
I wonder when the general public will get so angry over petty speeding offences that they actually do something?
the sooner the better

good on freeman for helping the cause of fighting a unjust law. i dont care how he fights it, aslong as he fights it
[misquote]
the ends justify the means
[/misquote]

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

291 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
The cps have a duty of full disclosure 7 days before the hearing and I bet they didn't do that. Or the defendant was willing to stand up in court and say he never received the NIP paperwork via the mail within 14 days of the offence. They wouldn't want that gem slipping out.

Dogwatch

6,384 posts

253 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Thirty-five in a thirty! He should be locked up to protect the rest of us from his furious driving. redcard

Watch your speed, not the road!

Sheriff JWPepper

3,851 posts

235 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Still too fast for him to spot the camera.

Nick_F

10,598 posts

277 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Sheriff JWPepper said:
Still too fast for him to spot the camera.
You presume that is was readily visible - it could have been a van that tagged him from 800m away.

Sheriff JWPepper

3,851 posts

235 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Those vans are even bigger. wink

Burgmeister

2,206 posts

241 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Sheriff JWPepper said:
Those vans are even bigger. wink
not if the markings make it look like a builders van wink


those cheeky robbing bastards

Sheriff JWPepper

3,851 posts

235 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
They don't change size just because they look like builders' vans. tongue out

ETA: Tongue firmly in cheek with above posts and some crap spelling.

Edited by Sheriff JWPepper on Wednesday 5th December 22:59

cuneus

5,963 posts

273 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Sheriff JWPepper said:
Those vans are even bigger. wink
How big are they to the human eye and can you distinguish the features at 800m ?

Sheriff JWPepper

3,851 posts

235 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Not sure & yes because I have clean licence.

Edited by Sheriff JWPepper on Friday 7th December 00:35

bi9_jk

883 posts

296 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
FishFace said:
Burgmeister said:
I wonder when the general public will get so angry over petty speeding offences that they actually do something?
The problem is you assume you're in the majority. Don't under estimate just how many people are actually pro-camera / anti-speed.
How terrable a presumption by burgmeister, that the majority of the population are not dumb, gullable, retarded, senile, stupid, mental, weak between the ears nor have a fetish for oppresion ect ect. Subsequently becoming an inescapeable conclusion he is one of the more enlightened majority.

Edited by bi9_jk on Wednesday 5th December 23:39

cuneus

5,963 posts

273 months

Wednesday 5th December 2007
quotequote all
Sheriff JWPepper said:
Not sure & yes because I have clean license.
I can say with some certainty that unless you are the 6 million dollar man you won't be able to resolve any of the signs or writing

derestrictor

18,764 posts

292 months

Thursday 6th December 2007
quotequote all
Fishface has a hugely significant point we tend to overlook round these parts.

Afaics, many folk are mindlessly sympathetic to the pettiness of the oppression for no other reason than yup, they have been successfully brainwashed: 'rules is rules and the fact that you've been nabbed is evidence enough of your guilt...'

Unsurprisingly, these people themselves speed, almost habitually and annoyingly for me personally is the familiar pattern of serial urban speeding which I do not condone, for reasons of the bleedin' obvious.

When I point out that 100 on a very busy M62 might be a tad unadvisable, the response is along the lines of 'everybody does it.'

The whole debacle is pure, hypocritical farce.