OOps.
Author
Discussion

Deltaf01

Original Poster:

1,512 posts

228 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all

FiveStar

760 posts

235 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
caused by sudden braking?

WeirdNeville

6,050 posts

246 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
Nasty.

I take it the scamera van was in no way involved in any direct or contributory way to that accident?

timskipper

1,306 posts

297 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
Or by some pillock messing with thier camera phone whilst driving? wink

Hooli

32,278 posts

231 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
is that a UFO undertaking you?

SirSimon

6,811 posts

234 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
nasty!

deeps

5,432 posts

272 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
Lovely pic.

Obviously the speed limit on that DC is too high! It should be reduced to 20, then at least 80% of those children that play on that road will survive when hit. That's why the Scamera van is on that particular road after all, or has it got something to do with £££ too, the local built-up area roads not yielding enough cash to meet the Scamera partnership's financial targets.

cluelessboy

66 posts

228 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
deeps said:
Lovely pic.

Obviously the speed limit on that DC is too high! It should be reduced to 20, then at least 80% of those children that play on that road will survive when hit. That's why the Scamera van is on that particular road after all, or has it got something to do with £££ too, the local built-up area roads not yielding enough cash to meet the Scamera partnership's financial targets.
This post had me in stitches. Thanks biggrin

Who me ?

7,455 posts

243 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
So I guess the accident rate was not reduced (at least not on that day ) by the presence of a camera (contrary to SCP propaganda that cameras reduce accidents ) rolleyesrolleyes

711

806 posts

256 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
Is that a scamera van? It looks like it says TLS vehicle services on the front and has some kind of blue metal cage behind the cab?

esselte

14,626 posts

298 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

vonhosen

40,597 posts

248 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

711

806 posts

256 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
[redacted]

i want an aero

642 posts

237 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
deeps said:
Lovely pic.

Obviously the speed limit on that DC is too high! It should be reduced to 20, then at least 80% of those children that play on that road will survive when hit. That's why the Scamera van is on that particular road after all, or has it got something to do with £££ too, the local built-up area roads not yielding enough cash to meet the Scamera partnership's financial targets.
great post, imho too true

PeteG

4,278 posts

242 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
Hooli said:
is that a UFO undertaking you?
hehe

DIW35

4,205 posts

231 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2008
quotequote all
What's the betting that someone braked for the camera van, and someone else wasn't paying attention. It's the sort of statistic you definitely won't be hearing about from the scamera partnerships.

Do0Bs

227 posts

228 months

Thursday 3rd January 2008
quotequote all
PeteG said:
Hooli said:
is that a UFO undertaking you?
hehe
hehe well spotted m8

bi9_jk

883 posts

296 months

Thursday 3rd January 2008
quotequote all
Im glad this was remarked now. It is always nice to signal the start of something. In the coming months and years this will not be remarkable. This will be common.