Buying one of last of the Cerbs
Buying one of last of the Cerbs
Author
Discussion

nig-gtv

Original Poster:

518 posts

265 months

Saturday 12th January 2008
quotequote all
I'm looking at a 2003'03 Cerb 4.2 with 22k miles and the Tuscan style lights - I've had a bit of a search on the forum but cant find much - is there much difference between these and the earlier ones? (i.e. is there much point paying for youth!).

I'm guessing on a Cerb less than 5yrs old the chassis will be good, and I've read that it's the 4.5 head on a 4.2 lump (or the other way round!). Are these later engine/clutches any more robust, or am I likely to need an engine rbuild on it before long if it hasnt been done already?

Thanks in advance....

touching cloth

11,706 posts

269 months

Saturday 12th January 2008
quotequote all
Not a huge amount of difference that I know of, the biggest facelift being around the 2000 which made a number of changes, but after that not a lot. I have heard mention that the factory guys always said the late 4.2's were among some of the best Cerbs made, that is probably down to the engine which you are aware of; it is indeed the other way around from what you said, 4.2 induction system on 4.5 bottom (this has never been officially verified as far as I know, but seems to hold true). No one knows quite what year/cars etc fell into this group, it probably came down a lot to what was around and in stock at the time. Also you might get late niceties such as the indented angled rear number plate which looks much better in my mind than the earlier backlit numbers, which appear to be just slapped on the back end - I never understood why they modified the Chim to this style in 98 but only the very late Cerbs (02 or so) seem to get it.

At the end of the day, youth, as with many cars, can help but then older cars have often been fettled more and often improved upon. If they have needed new shocks they may now be running Nitrons or Ohlins etc, they may have had a recent clutch which a newer car maybe due - at the end of the day each car will have to be taken on it's merits.

nig-gtv

Original Poster:

518 posts

265 months

Saturday 12th January 2008
quotequote all
Thanks for that. Yep, it has the angled rear plate and I agree with you - looks much better.

Is the cerb much longer than my old Chimaeras - they look it, but not sure if it's deceptive...

Jonnie B

229 posts

249 months

Saturday 12th January 2008
quotequote all
nig-gtv said:
Thanks for that. Yep, it has the angled rear plate and I agree with you - looks much better.

Is the cerb much longer than my old Chimaeras - they look it, but not sure if it's deceptive...
Hi. i think about 100mm

SimonSparrow

1,599 posts

292 months

Saturday 12th January 2008
quotequote all
I think the backlit plate is cool! I remember my first Le Mans where we spent half the night turning the light off and on just to look.

Youth of today, pah!

hehe

big_treacle

1,727 posts

290 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
I went for a post 2000 facelift model as I didn't like the letterbox windscreen of the earlier ones.