Sunday Times InGear today "Too fast by half" Elise SC
Sunday Times InGear today "Too fast by half" Elise SC
Author
Discussion

Grinnders

Original Poster:

1,558 posts

235 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
Get your copy today

edited to say or free here http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/driving/new_car_reviews/article3171001.ece 

Edited by Grinnders on Sunday 13th January 10:22

Alex_S

75 posts

249 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
I know im nitpicking here but doesnt Elise SC stand for 'SuperCharged', which is actually written on the car, as opposed to Elise S 'Compressor' as he claims in the article? He also says it is the Elise S engine which has been superchargeed, whereas i thought it was the Elise R engine that was supercharged in the SC and the 134bhp motor is an entirely different engine?

Snapper7

990 posts

290 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
Alex_S said:
I know im nitpicking here but doesnt Elise SC stand for 'SuperCharged', which is actually written on the car, as opposed to Elise S 'Compressor' as he claims in the article? He also says it is the Elise S engine which has been superchargeed, whereas i thought it was the Elise R engine that was supercharged in the SC and the 134bhp motor is an entirely different engine?
I might be wrong but I thought that a compressor was a form of supercharger....

NathanE

539 posts

233 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
That's a pretty bad review. He has made a fatal mistake in believing it is simply an Elise S with a supercharger. It isn't. It's an Elise R with a supercharger.

So he is flinging around the Elise S performance stats versus the new "supercharged" stats.

He reckons it has the same gearbox as the S, so apparently he didn't notice the 6th gear biggrin

You'd have think he would have read the documents Lotus puts in the passenger seat of any press car!

Edited by NathanE on Sunday 13th January 11:33

21TonyK

13,380 posts

240 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
Anyone care to post some corrections via "Have your say" laugh

MrP80

312 posts

231 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
21TonyK said:
Anyone care to post some corrections via "Have your say" laugh
Added a few, though they never seem to add my comments that point out the errors in their article. I questioned this in the past and was told I wasn't adding my views, I was correcting errors - which should be emailed to them I was told.



Edited by MrP80 on Sunday 13th January 11:49

MW666

64 posts

255 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
Frankel is a respected and highly experienced writer, so i'm alarmed at the lack of knowledge he demonstrated for this model...

Alex_S

75 posts

249 months

Sunday 13th January 2008
quotequote all
Snapper7 said:
Alex_S said:
I know im nitpicking here but doesnt Elise SC stand for 'SuperCharged', which is actually written on the car, as opposed to Elise S 'Compressor' as he claims in the article? He also says it is the Elise S engine which has been superchargeed, whereas i thought it was the Elise R engine that was supercharged in the SC and the 134bhp motor is an entirely different engine?
I might be wrong but I thought that a compressor was a form of supercharger....
Yes i think youre right, but its not actually the name of the car as he claims, which leads me to believe he thinks hes reviewing a supercharged Elise S as others have said.

Gooby

9,269 posts

265 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
I do find it a bit odd. Both the times and car are saying that the S delivers the same and is cheaper. That is fine but when have you ever hears a car be critisised for being faster?
Top Gear fall over thier feet when the monaro gets a few extra BHP etc etc.

I did find both reviews a little "thin".

Foolish Dave

2,101 posts

287 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
"Tom, Midlands" has commented with the corrections and they are there now.

Rubbish review.

JamesG

128 posts

296 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Well, I thought it was a good review in spite of a few minor mistakes.

The writer's premise is that the overall driving experience is not enhanced by having more power. I think this is a fair point - not because the Elise brakes and chassis can't cope with the additional power - they obviously can, but because the average driver on Britain's roads can't exploit it.

For me, a huge part of the fun of the Elise is the challenge of driving the car approaching its limits. It doesn't have much torque low down, so it's important to change gear at the right time. The car rewards you when you get a corner right, and it's obvious when you don't.

As you improve as a driver, you can cope with increasing levels of power while still pushing the car to the limit around the bends. But without the right skills, you end up doing a point-and-squirt. Potentially fast in a powerful car, but not very rewarding. That was definitely the case with my Supra Twin Turbo which was faster in almost every condition than my Elises, but nowhere near as much fun.

Perhaps the review should have recommended the car for track use and for more experienced drivers, but it did say that power is not the be all and end all.

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
I think the SC is the car that will re-invigorate the Elise just as the Exige S helped make that engine make more sense than the peaky R. I'm sure that and the S will sell like hotcakes, but suspect R sales will be hit vs. the SC.

It'll be a great all-rounder, road and track. I'm pleased to see it, and will deffo give it a test drive when available.

bogie

17,101 posts

303 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
not sure about the review, but at least Lotus listen to what their market wants - more power wink

I mean for the no of cars sold (maybe 25K units?) the aftermarket tuning industry is huge ...there must be 500 cars WW with engine swaps and thousands with modded K's. A large proportion of the Elise market is repeat business - existing owners "upgrading" so they have to cater for these or lose them to other brands and/or the aftermarket world. I think they are doing the right thing having a range of powered products and its certainly better than the old Rover K series day where they'd charge you £4-5K for a modded head, a paint job and 15bhp wink

bencollins

3,574 posts

236 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Typical moron auto journalism. Compressors are for power tools. DUH!
These days, its dippy posh bints and failed tory councillors doing write ups, concentrating on their viz like metaphors not sodding facts.
JC say the MX5 roof is metal.
Pathetic.

Heebeegeetee

30,254 posts

279 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
bencollins said:
Typical moron auto journalism. Compressors are for power tools. DUH!
These days, its dippy posh bints and failed tory councillors doing write ups, concentrating on their viz like metaphors not sodding facts.
JC say the MX5 roof is metal.
Pathetic.
Do you know who Andrew Frankel is?

Ok, he hasn't described the pudding with 100% accuracy, but is the proof still not in the eating nevertheless?

Stitch

933 posts

248 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
But the MX5 Clarkson was talking about does have a metal folding roof

Heebeegeetee

30,254 posts

279 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Stitch said:
But the MX5 Clarkson was talking about does have a metal folding roof
I thought they were composite.

But then i've never taken a scrap of notice of what Clarkson says about cars. Andrew Frankel is different though.

S Works

10,166 posts

281 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Au contraire. I don't remember a single good review written by him.

Heebeegeetee

30,254 posts

279 months

Wednesday 16th January 2008
quotequote all
S Works said:
Au contraire. I don't remember a single good review written by him.
Fair enough. I've often enjoyed his writing, particularly when he was with Motorsport.

Tbh, i don't take that much notice of any car review. I think most, if not all, have errors, going by how reports on the same car can differ from mag to mag.