Speeding cop banned
Author
Discussion

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,084 posts

231 months

mrmr96

13,736 posts

235 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
Pah, nevermind the speeding. What about perverting the course of justice or lying under oath? For him to stand up and say he was "on his way to pick someone up" and then suddenly decided to "assess the M9 for a possible new location for driver training" is surely unbelieveable?!

supermono

7,464 posts

279 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Ho hum. Another career ruined because of this insane obsession with punishing according to the number on the dial.

Although I take some comfort from the fact that this time it's someone being forced to take some of his own medicine, but it's a tragegy nevertheless.

If only these imbeciles would accept that 120mph isn't dangerous they could start looking to tackle road safety issues...

SM

i want an aero

642 posts

237 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
lucky not to go down for perverting the course of justice. good to see that the bib aren't immune even though the figures seem to suggest they are

BOF

991 posts

254 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Look on the bright side lads...

We have a Senior Trafpol BANNED for speeding...quite likely one of the drivers who could handle a car at speed with an element of safety.

Think of the hundreds of hours saved by anti Police punters posting that he had been 'let off' because he was Police.

He was speeding, he got nicked, he is paying the price...if he had been a football player or a boxer, he could have beat the rap?

Sorry for him...comfortable with the system...

BOF.

Jasandjules

72,683 posts

260 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
BOF said:
Sorry for him...comfortable with the system...
BOF.
I'm sorry for him, and uncomfortable with the system.


deeps

5,432 posts

272 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
What a shame this guy felt the need to make up a story. If he'd just stated that he was driving at what he considered to be a safe speed for the conditions the outcome would have been no worse for him, and maybe it would have done some good in helping various people understand that speed can be safe and shouldn't be punished merely for the speeds sake alone.

I wonder why he didn't anticipate a mobile scamera, or slow down for the bridge that it was scamming from before he came into its veiw? Obviously he was a bit out of touch with the extent of current scamera activity!

I hate to see a good driver falling foul of speed scammers, but unless the ones in positions of influence like himself speak up, then the scammers will remain in power. Reminds me of Med Hughes this, when he was banned for 90. Did he stick up for himself, nah just spouted even more speed kills nonsense that he doesn't even believe or he wouldn't have been doing 90! Sickening hypocrite! Why do they all say one thing and do another?

Heebeegeetee

30,255 posts

279 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Hmm. I never believe that someone suddenly starts telling lies, that it comes out of the blue, as it were. I think this guy was telling lies because that's what he's always done.

Its taken well over a year for this to come to court, in which time the guy has been able to retire and thus keep his pension intact. I don't mind that, apart from the fact that a MOP wouldn't have been afforded the same luxury.

Festisio

772 posts

235 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Could be worse, this is what they do to speeding Saudis.

This site is completely and utterly NOT safe for work.

http://www.theync.com/media.php?name=857-what-they...


rewc

2,187 posts

264 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
I don't want to appear unchristian but I think that power had gone to his head. He didn't think that the rules that applied to Plebs applied to him - the same as CC Hughes. He squirmed and he squirmed but it didn't work this time. If I held a poll of 100 people and asked "do you believe he was using his exemption in accordance with approved procedures" how many would say yes?

I do not believe he was driving dangerously although braking heavily and changing lanes at that speed is a bit foolhardy.

I have no sympathy. I am sure he preached the "Speed Kills" line.
Live by the sword and you die by it.

supersingle

3,205 posts

250 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Retirement at 48, s'alright for some. irked

It does look like he was forced into it through. What sort of petty minded bureaucracy ends someones career for such a mirror transgression?

rewc

2,187 posts

264 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Festisio said:
Could be worse, this is what they do to speeding Saudis.

This site is completely and utterly NOT safe for work.

http://www.theync.com/media.php?name=857-what-they...
I worked in Saudi for 2 years and I would bet that the person being whipped is not a Saudi but an immigant or migrant worker. It is also worth noting he is being whipped across a blue band vehicle which is the normal Police and not traffic Police who drive green banded ones.

supersingle

3,205 posts

250 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
Retirement at 48, s'alright for some. irked

It does look like he was forced into it through. What sort of petty minded bureaucracy ends someones career for such a mirror transgression?

vonhosen

40,597 posts

248 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
supersingle said:
Retirement at 48, s'alright for some. irked

It does look like he was forced into it through. What sort of petty minded bureaucracy ends someones career for such a mirror transgression?
It wouldn't end for that. He's probably chosen to retire because he had reached an age he could & didn't won't to get posted back doing early, late & nights.

DucatiGary

7,765 posts

256 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
supermono said:
Ho hum. Another career ruined because of this insane obsession with punishing according to the number on the dial.

Although I take some comfort from the fact that this time it's someone being forced to take some of his own medicine, but it's a tragegy nevertheless.

If only these imbeciles would accept that 120mph isn't dangerous they could start looking to tackle road safety issues...

SM
+1

bet he was a good plod too.

would be just our luck.

Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

282 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
supermono said:
Ho hum. Another career ruined because of this insane obsession with punishing according to the number on the dial.

Although I take some comfort from the fact that this time it's someone being forced to take some of his own medicine, but it's a tragegy nevertheless.

If only these imbeciles would accept that 120mph isn't dangerous they could start looking to tackle road safety issues...

SM
Asolutely, but the police are the only people who have sufficient credibility with the govt to make them listen . . . so far the police have gone along with the govt and even endorsed their policies so it's only right they suffer the same as the rest of us have had to.

Maybe getting plod banned like this is the way to change the system and make them listen ? I can't see how else it will change.

matchmaker

Original Poster:

9,084 posts

231 months

Monday 14th January 2008
quotequote all
I started this thread, so better comment.

I use the M9 regularly, and can't say that I go everywhere at no more than 70 mph. But where this guy was clocked is an accident black spot - it's a busy(ish) junction (M9 & M876), and is on a bend.

What riled me about it was the way he tried to get out of it. I have a lot of respect for my local police force (generally!), and the fact that they refused to brush this under the carpet earns them a gold star from me.biggrinbiggrin

WildCat

8,369 posts

274 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
The story back at "blighty base" from what I gatehr .. courtesy of cous' ... ist that he did not make up an excuse.

He was on a genuine training recce for setting a test to trafpol candidates. He'd been over a planned test route for RPU "graduate exams". (It seems they like to test the RPU on "unseen routes" as genuine calls "are not per the training drills" winkwhistle)


As he went up the motorway to pick up the other policeman - it apparently occurred to him that this would also make a decent potential test run .. so he decided to assess it on the spur of moment.. but had not cleared with base or the "host force" rolleyes It not quite in same "relegation" league as the spouter of the speed cam "deterring speeding" und then blatting up whilst off duty und on holidays.


It seem that he broke some internal guidelines .... whistle

Besides this guy teaches folk to drive at over the ton safely whilst on way to diffuse those unexploded doughnuts which liebster mgb enjoys und liebster von dunks . hehe

DPX

1,027 posts

231 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Real silly
Being paid , nice area , nice views , someone else's petrol , nice motor
Sit back make 69.99999 mph radio on , enjoy it and go with the flow

Slowly slowly

2,474 posts

255 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Yet another story of a policeman who was prepared to lie to keep his job/licence/good name.
Who can honestly say they wouldn't do the same thing, the problem is one bad copper makes the rest look bad, I think the situation with bent coppers is getting better(probably because they are more likely to get filmed/caught).
From memory they were all at it in the 70's and 80's (said with tongue firmly planted in cheek).