Slight increase in Super License Costs!!!!
Slight increase in Super License Costs!!!!
Author
Discussion

blonde driver

Original Poster:

39 posts

275 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/64750

Ouch!!!

===============================================



Superlicence cost goes up from 2008

By Steve Cooper Friday, January 18th 2008, 11:18 GMT


The FIA has increased the cost of a Formula One superlicense from 2008, this week's Autosport magazine reports.

A superlicense is mandatory for an F1 driver, and last season it cost only 1,690 euros, plus an additional 447 euros per point scored in the previous year's championship.

However, the World Motor Sport Council recently approved a major increase in the license price, to 10,000 euros plus 2,000 euros per point.

This means world champion Kimi Raikkonen's superlicense will cost him 230,000 euros - an increase of 199,255 euros compared to 2007.

The total bill for both Ferrari drivers will now be 428,000 euros, who together scored 204 points last year, will now be 428,000 euros.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Don't think they'll be fretting about the cost hehe

Still, now we know why Lewis and Fernando kept their points last year...

blonde driver

Original Poster:

39 posts

275 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
Don't think they'll be fretting about the cost hehe

Still, now we know why Lewis and Fernando kept their points last year...
hahaha - good point

flemke

23,481 posts

266 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
If anyone has an idea about the justification for the licence fee's being dependent on points scored, I'd love to hear it.

AndrewD

7,657 posts

313 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Haven't you heard? Another ingenious scheme from Max. Apparently this one is supposed to encourage overtaking wink

blonde driver

Original Poster:

39 posts

275 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
The fia do make me laugh. A Total JOKE.

Presume the teams pay these fee'a anyway.

Like the car, you need to be provided with one in order to race.

Altrezia

8,740 posts

240 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
I do not understand the points thing. Madness.

belleair302

7,008 posts

236 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Anybody aware of how much the FIA pay the teams per point??? Its more than the cost of having the license!!!

flemke

23,481 posts

266 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
blonde driver said:
The fia do make me laugh. A Total JOKE.

Presume the teams pay these fee'a anyway.

Like the car, you need to be provided with one in order to race.
If Schumacher, or even Montoya, had wanted to retain their superlicences after their contracts had run out, they would have had to pay the tens of thousands themselves.

Does not make a lot of sense. Welcome to MaxieWorld.

chris_w

2,571 posts

288 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Strange decision coming in the same week as their cost-capping announcement...

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
flemke said:
blonde driver said:
The fia do make me laugh. A Total JOKE.

Presume the teams pay these fee'a anyway.

Like the car, you need to be provided with one in order to race.
If Schumacher, or even Montoya, had wanted to retain their superlicences after their contracts had run out, they would have had to pay the tens of thousands themselves.

Does not make a lot of sense. Welcome to MaxieWorld.
I would assume that's why they have done it??

it will cut down the number of licence holders at a stroke...

Why they would want to do this escapes me? makes being a test driver chuffin expencive...

andye30m3

3,499 posts

283 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Could it be to get funds from the people earning £1,000,000's out of motorsport to avoid increasing the costs at club level and incourage people to take part in the sport or is that just being optirmistic?

chris_w

2,571 posts

288 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
it will cut down the number of licence holders at a stroke...

Why they would want to do this escapes me? makes being a test driver chuffin expencive...
They've just cut off another source of revenue for the small teams - remember the Israeli and Russian test drivers Minardi(iirc) used - I'm sure they provided no useful information tooling round, seconds off the pace in their test sessions but I bet they (or their sponsors) paid handsomely for the pleasure.

flemke

23,481 posts

266 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
andye30m3 said:
Could it be to get funds from the people earning £1,000,000's out of motorsport to avoid increasing the costs at club level and incourage people to take part in the sport or is that just being optirmistic?
If I am not mistaken, the FIA recently awarded itself a $100,000,000 bonus for its contributions to motorsport, the monies to be paid by the teams (or was it by just one of them...scratchchin), and it is still working out how to spend that amount.

team underdog

938 posts

258 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
chris_w said:
Scuffers said:
it will cut down the number of licence holders at a stroke...

Why they would want to do this escapes me? makes being a test driver chuffin expencive...
They've just cut off another source of revenue for the small teams - remember the Israeli and Russian test drivers Minardi(iirc) used - I'm sure they provided no useful information tooling round, seconds off the pace in their test sessions but I bet they (or their sponsors) paid handsomely for the pleasure.
I think the purpose is exactly that, to limit the number of pay drivers. However it will also limit young talented drivers on a tight budget! Totally pointless really...

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
You don't need a super licence for testing purposes. On a test day you'll see some of the cars with a green flashing light on the rear where the rain light normally is - this is the F1 equivalent to big green P plate on a road car.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
flemke said:
If Schumacher, or even Montoya, had wanted to retain their superlicences after their contracts had run out, they would have had to pay the tens of thousands themselves.
Hate to be blunt but on the list of things to worry about in the world, forgive me if this isn't particularly high on the list rofl

MonkeyHanger

9,267 posts

271 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
chris_w said:
Strange decision coming in the same week as their cost-capping announcement...
That'll be cost-cutting in order to shovel more cash to the FIA, not in order to actually make it any cheaper for the teams smile

1

2,732 posts

265 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
team underdog said:
chris_w said:
Scuffers said:
it will cut down the number of licence holders at a stroke...

Why they would want to do this escapes me? makes being a test driver chuffin expencive...
They've just cut off another source of revenue for the small teams - remember the Israeli and Russian test drivers Minardi(iirc) used - I'm sure they provided no useful information tooling round, seconds off the pace in their test sessions but I bet they (or their sponsors) paid handsomely for the pleasure.
I think the purpose is exactly that, to limit the number of pay drivers. However it will also limit young talented drivers on a tight budget! Totally pointless really...
You honestly think that £7500 is going to restrict the number of pay drivers? rofl

They will spend that much just getting to the circuit.

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Friday 18th January 2008
quotequote all
Now we know why Schumacher retired; to pay for the mortgage on his castle.