Huge difference in prices
Huge difference in prices
Author
Discussion

mondeoman

Original Poster:

11,430 posts

296 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
Just pondering the next (possible) car, and found three examples that confused the hell out of me.

Now, to my mind, generally the older the car, the cheaper the price, allowing for mileage etc...

2003 53 LAMBORGHINI Murcielago VT Coupe
Manual 6 speed, Coupe, 26,000 miles. Metallic orange with full blue alacantara trim with orange stitching, leather dash, sports exhaust, rear spoiler supplied and fitted by main dealer, climate control, electric windows and mirrors, remote central locking cat 1 alarm, multi cd, colour coded brake calipers, front lifting system, electric folding wing mirrors, tracker £99,900

2004 54 LAMBORGHINI Gallardo Coupe
2 Doors, Manual, Coupe, Petrol, 11,000 miles, BLACK. full black leather heated electric seats with electric lumbar support, touch screen colour sat nav with built in reversing camera, 18 inch alloys, sports exhaust, privacy glass, electric folding mirrors, leather dash and door cards, Xenons, full Lamborghini service history (last serviced @9,000 miles and new clutch), £84,900

2002 52 LAMBORGHINI Murcielago VT Coupe
2 Doors, Manual, Coupe, Petrol, 19,000 miles, MAUVE. Metallic Purple with full leather sports seats, 18 inch split rim alloys, front hydraulic lift, cross drilled discs with body colour coded calipers, cd, climate control, traction control, 4 wheel drive, Xenon headlights with headlamp wash £83,900


All lovely looking cars, but surely ther ornage one isn't worht £15k MORE than a newer car with less miles????

What am I missing here rolleyes

matc

4,738 posts

237 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
The newer car is a Gallardo not a murcielago!!

LittleBro

9,455 posts

264 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
matc said:
The newer car is a Gallardo not a murcielago!!
hehe

XXVIII

2,800 posts

244 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
... could almost make a case for the older Murciélago being underpriced as well ...

who is / who are the vendor / s ?

mondeoman

Original Poster:

11,430 posts

296 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
matc said:
The newer car is a Gallardo not a murcielago!!
Damn !!! hehe

chris_crossley

1,164 posts

313 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
2002 52 LAMBORGHINI Murcielago VT Coupe
2 Doors, Manual, Coupe, Petrol, 19,000 miles, MAUVE. Metallic Purple with full leather sports seats, 18 inch split rim alloys, front hydraulic lift, cross drilled discs with body colour coded calipers, cd, climate control, traction control, 4 wheel drive, Xenon headlights with headlamp wash £83,900
I like Gallardo's but this Murci dosn't seem too bad. Do you have a link? Would like to see what Metallic Purple looks like. Hmmmmmmmmmm Did they do a VT murcie. Thought that was a diabelo?

mondeoman

Original Poster:

11,430 posts

296 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
XXVIII said:
... could almost make a case for the older Murciélago being underpriced as well ...

who is / who are the vendor / s ?
all at G C Motors here

MattOz

4,021 posts

294 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
The Purple Murcie is advertised at £93,990, so guess £83,990 was a typo.

Matt

LamboFool

310 posts

236 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
Is this the one that was up for rental at a place up North somewhere? I remember someone doing a post on here a few weeks or months ago about it?


arryb

11,336 posts

232 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
MattOz said:
The Purple Murcie is advertised at £93,990, so guess £83,990 was a typo.

Matt
And I thought my eyes were bad hehe OP was right!!

LamboAndy

81 posts

228 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
chris_crossley said:
mondeoman said:
Hmmmmmmmmmm Did they do a VT murcie. Thought that was a diabelo?
All murcies are VT.

Andy

cronk-flakes

3,480 posts

283 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
LamboAndy said:
chris_crossley said:
mondeoman said:
Hmmmmmmmmmm Did they do a VT murcie. Thought that was a diabelo?
All murcies are VT.

Andy
Thats some mighty fine quoting you got there, Andy. hehe

wink

ETA: Ahhhh, I've been sucked in tooo!!!

Edited by cronk-flakes on Thursday 24th January 14:51

chris_crossley

1,164 posts

313 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
MattOz said:
The Purple Murcie is advertised at £93,990, so guess £83,990 was a typo.

Matt
Whats 10k between friends, woops.

Whats VT mean?

LamboAndy

81 posts

228 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
Viscous Traction. basically the mechanical 4WD system.

jackyum

693 posts

269 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
They were both hire cars at one point, I think the orange one was a P1 car, was posted on here a while ago.

Mileage does make a big difference too.

mondeoman

Original Poster:

11,430 posts

296 months

Thursday 24th January 2008
quotequote all
MattOz said:
The Purple Murcie is advertised at £93,990, so guess £83,990 was a typo.

Matt
They've bloody changed it - Honest Guv!! it was £83,900 earlier cry

flow99

1,336 posts

238 months

Friday 25th January 2008
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
MattOz said:
The Purple Murcie is advertised at £93,990, so guess £83,990 was a typo.

Matt
They've bloody changed it - Honest Guv!! it was £83,900 earlier cry
Ah, but it was probably a Gallardo then? biggrin