Valencia, LH 5th in testing...
Discussion
Oh no, it's all over....
It's testing. Not who can go the fastest but about developing the car and with new rules there are engine maps and diff and brake settings to work through that have to be consistent for the races.
It's also January 25th. More than 6 weeks from Melbourne, so worrying about the fastest time of the test is not important.
It's testing. Not who can go the fastest but about developing the car and with new rules there are engine maps and diff and brake settings to work through that have to be consistent for the races.
It's also January 25th. More than 6 weeks from Melbourne, so worrying about the fastest time of the test is not important.
kevin ritson said:
Oh no, it's all over....
It's testing. Not who can go the fastest but about developing the car and with new rules there are engine maps and diff and brake settings to work through that have to be consistent for the races.
It's also January 25th. More than 6 weeks from Melbourne, so worrying about the fastest time of the test is not important.
But I would have thought Lewis would have STILL wanted to be fastest even if he was testing etc?It's testing. Not who can go the fastest but about developing the car and with new rules there are engine maps and diff and brake settings to work through that have to be consistent for the races.
It's also January 25th. More than 6 weeks from Melbourne, so worrying about the fastest time of the test is not important.
Tony (still concerned)
They don't always test the best setup for the circuit they are driving, the don't race at Valencia so no point in getting the cars precisely setup for it and with 2 cars on track they could have been running 2 slightly different setups for the car and getting feedback for both for baseline setup analysis. Possibly with thoughts to what they will do in Melbourne.
FourWheelDrift said:
They don't always test the best setup for the circuit they are driving, the don't race at Valencia so no point in getting the cars precisely setup for it and with 2 cars on track they could have been running 2 slightly different setups for the car and getting feedback for both for baseline setup analysis. Possibly with thoughts to what they will do in Melbourne.
Just to point out (although I'm sure you know) but they are racing at Valencia this year, so there would be some point in getting the car set up for the track.Still, testing means nothing. Didn't Honda roll out a car a few years ago that was blisteringly fast in testing yet nowhere in the races (and I'm not thinking about 2007 - that wasn't fast in testing either)?
Most of the teams have very different agendas on any given test,
http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news/detail/...
http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news/detail/...
Teppic said:
FourWheelDrift said:
They don't always test the best setup for the circuit they are driving, the don't race at Valencia so no point in getting the cars precisely setup for it and with 2 cars on track they could have been running 2 slightly different setups for the car and getting feedback for both for baseline setup analysis. Possibly with thoughts to what they will do in Melbourne.
Just to point out (although I'm sure you know) but they are racing at Valencia this year, so there would be some point in getting the car set up for the track.
FourWheelDrift said:
Teppic said:
FourWheelDrift said:
They don't always test the best setup for the circuit they are driving, the don't race at Valencia so no point in getting the cars precisely setup for it and with 2 cars on track they could have been running 2 slightly different setups for the car and getting feedback for both for baseline setup analysis. Possibly with thoughts to what they will do in Melbourne.
Just to point out (although I'm sure you know) but they are racing at Valencia this year, so there would be some point in getting the car set up for the track.
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




