Can you have fun on a 125cc bike?
Can you have fun on a 125cc bike?
Author
Discussion

Beemer-5

Original Poster:

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
I had a go yesterday on an Aprilia RS125 and i was amazed at how much fun it was and how fast it felt, for a bike with an engine capacity no bigger than half a coffee cup!
It felt faster than it really was, i guess, because of the 9,500 rpm-everywhere motor, but it was actually great to ride a bike 10-tenths and know you won't be going to jail!
It's not even a new bike, it's a 2004, nursed up to a very impressive 38 bhp by it's owner and a tuner in Kent.
I don't think i've ever known a road 125 which will do 100 mph, with a gear to go! (About 110 mph top speed, brilliant for a 125cc bike imo).


y2blade

56,322 posts

246 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
i can have fun on ANY size bike smile

mitzy1968

13,858 posts

228 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
I have a sachs 125, my first bike, and I have a great time on it

Apart from the side stand (see other post)

It looks great, rides well, has a rather long tank but is getting me ready for my next step up after DAS, which will be at the moment a GSXR 400.

But agree any bike is fun, and the people that ride them are too!




Edited by mitzy1968 on Wednesday 6th February 09:54

JackHolroyde

490 posts

229 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
The hyosung was really stable on the twisties.
Got my first kneedown on it.
The Sachs XTC is an absolute HOOT!

sprinter885

11,550 posts

258 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
Luigi Taveri's 5 pot 125 Honda or Bill Ivy's Yam hehe

catso

16,529 posts

298 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
I know what you mean, I had an RS125 for a couple of days a few years back (as a courtesy bike whilst my 916 was in for service).

Whilst obviously way down on power to what I'm used to, it was great fun, except when pulling out to overtake a truck at 50-60mph and there being very little go (although me being 15st mass didn't help rolleyes ) but a blast being able to give it full throttle anywhere without highsiding/getting arrested, I think I'd get bored quickly though as I do like a torquey midrange.

beer

sjtscott

4,215 posts

262 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
I know its got double the cc but for me the smaller lightest bike I've ridden and had most fun on was my mates old RGV250. Wasn't that slow when you gave it death everywhere handled and stopped like a dream. I remember thrapping it flat out through the gears in Milton Keynes and thinking wow I'm playing GP racers here given the 2 stroke sound! I also loved the lack of engine braking the 2 stroke gave for downchanges too.

Beemer-5

Original Poster:

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
catso said:
I know what you mean, I had an RS125 for a couple of days a few years back (as a courtesy bike whilst my 916 was in for service).

Whilst obviously way down on power to what I'm used to, it was great fun, except when pulling out to overtake a truck at 50-60mph and there being very little go (although me being 15st mass didn't help rolleyes ) but a blast being able to give it full throttle anywhere without highsiding/getting arrested, I think I'd get bored quickly though as I do like a torquey midrange.

beer
This thing had 38 bhp, so had a fair bit more than a stocker.
It would pull hard until about 90 mph.

Beemer-5

Original Poster:

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
sjtscott said:
I know its got double the cc but for me the smaller lightest bike I've ridden and had most fun on was my mates old RGV250. Wasn't that slow when you gave it death everywhere handled and stopped like a dream. I remember thrapping it flat out through the gears in Milton Keynes and thinking wow I'm playing GP racers here given the 2 stroke sound! I also loved the lack of engine braking the 2 stroke gave for downchanges too.
I agree about the lack of weight.
My Husky had 67 grunty bhp, pulled well from just off idle and weighed the same as a Cagiva Mito 125!!!

catso

16,529 posts

298 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
Beemer-5 said:
catso said:
I know what you mean, I had an RS125 for a couple of days a few years back (as a courtesy bike whilst my 916 was in for service).

Whilst obviously way down on power to what I'm used to, it was great fun, except when pulling out to overtake a truck at 50-60mph and there being very little go (although me being 15st mass didn't help rolleyes ) but a blast being able to give it full throttle anywhere without highsiding/getting arrested, I think I'd get bored quickly though as I do like a torquey midrange.

beer
This thing had 38 bhp, so had a fair bit more than a stocker.
It would pull hard until about 90 mph.
No idea how much power this one had but I got an indicated 100mph on the clock (private test track of course) the shop told me it would do around 110 but I think it'd need time (and probably a smaller jockey) to get there.

Also they told me not to ride it until the engine had reached a certain temp on the gauge, due to it seizing up if revved from cold?

I would reckon the 250 is a riot.....

beer

y2blade

56,322 posts

246 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
catso said:
Beemer-5 said:
catso said:
I know what you mean, I had an RS125 for a couple of days a few years back (as a courtesy bike whilst my 916 was in for service).

Whilst obviously way down on power to what I'm used to, it was great fun, except when pulling out to overtake a truck at 50-60mph and there being very little go (although me being 15st mass didn't help rolleyes ) but a blast being able to give it full throttle anywhere without highsiding/getting arrested, I think I'd get bored quickly though as I do like a torquey midrange.

beer
This thing had 38 bhp, so had a fair bit more than a stocker.
It would pull hard until about 90 mph.
No idea how much power this one had but I got an indicated 100mph on the clock (private test track of course) the shop told me it would do around 110 but I think it'd need time (and probably a smaller jockey) to get there.

Also they told me not to ride it until the engine had reached a certain temp on the gauge, due to it seizing up if revved from cold?

I would reckon the 250 is a riot.....

beer
my mate had a RG125 that would do an indicated 100mph cool


Beemer-5

Original Poster:

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
None of the std 125s would do a true 100 mph.
The speeds i quoted, were calculated from gearing and a genuine 110 mph is exceptional for a road 125, as was the 38 bhp dyno figure.

Catso, the Aprilia RS250 is a hoot. I had a tuned one for a year or more, back in 2000-2001.

Edited by Beemer-5 on Wednesday 6th February 16:59

EvoBarry

1,903 posts

296 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
Back in the day I had an RD125LC and a DT125R, both hilarious fun at the time. I did prefer the KMX200 I had after that though, the extra "grunt" was welcome.

Hell, I've had fun on the 200cc scooter I use for work :P

Rubin215

2,084 posts

227 months

Wednesday 6th February 2008
quotequote all
Slightly different take on 125cc's but is anyone else excited about Bradley Smith doing so well in the pre-season testing?

After last season when we continually had four or five different riders fighting for podiums (and not some runaway Aussie doing a Doohan) I'm all up for this year.

125's boring? Nyaaaaaahhhhh!!!!!

G Man

4,053 posts

291 months

Thursday 7th February 2008
quotequote all
Bikes are the polar opposite of women, you have fun on both but the larger capacity the bike the better, with women the opposite, you would prefer a stripped down racing model against a big unit so you get more feel whistle

Beemer-5

Original Poster:

7,897 posts

245 months

Thursday 7th February 2008
quotequote all
Big lungs are nice though.



Bikes, i mean!

catso

16,529 posts

298 months

Thursday 7th February 2008
quotequote all
G Man said:
Bikes are the polar opposite of women, you have fun on both but the larger capacity the bike the better, with women the opposite, you would prefer a stripped down racing model against a big unit so you get more feel whistle
And if it doesn't come with all the bits as standard, there's always the aftermarket. wink

G Man

4,053 posts

291 months

Thursday 7th February 2008
quotequote all
catso said:
G Man said:
Bikes are the polar opposite of women, you have fun on both but the larger capacity the bike the better, with women the opposite, you would prefer a stripped down racing model against a big unit so you get more feel whistle
And if it doesn't come with all the bits as standard, there's always the aftermarket. wink
True but the engine is key do you want a high revving unit or a 1 cylinder old banger ( definately better for beginners to learn the trade on )

jvaughan

6,025 posts

314 months

Thursday 7th February 2008
quotequote all
I miss my old DT-125 .. not a lot of power, but good fun off road

texasjohn

3,687 posts

262 months

Thursday 7th February 2008
quotequote all
Yes you can have great fun on a 125, I certainly did, light chuckable bikes, 10/10ths everywhere, L plates off and gone up the motorway for a vmax run (only did it the once though, honest!), those were the days...