Help !
Author
Discussion

tiger7

Original Poster:

5 posts

217 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
Can anyone help me? Is there a gearbox that can be fitted to a Rover 115 diesel engine, to convert it to rear wheel drive.I am toying with the idea of converting a 7 kitcar to biodiesel and the Rover engine seems to be a lighter option to many available.Any replies or advice much appreciated. tiger7.

Paul Drawmer

5,121 posts

291 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
I think the 115 used a PG1 gearbox, which was also often fitted to the K series engines.

Maybe the way to go would be look for rwd drive trains that fit onto the K series.

Actually, due to the extra weight of a diesel.........

X-man

248 posts

240 months

Tuesday 18th March 2008
quotequote all
I remembered this being in the classifieds, it's now sold but you may be able to get some ideas from it. http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/394084.htm

Edited by X-man on Tuesday 18th March 21:21

thescamper

920 posts

250 months

Wednesday 19th March 2008
quotequote all
If the metro diesel does indeed use the PG1 box then I would suggest that the sierra box could fit but an adapter plate would be required, try caterham although it won't be cheap.

FlossyThePig

4,138 posts

267 months

Wednesday 19th March 2008
quotequote all
The Rover 115 used a peugeot engine so it is probably attached to a Peugeot gearbox. Probably the same as Saxo and 106.

I'm sure a lot of RWD gearboxes could be fitted with a custom adapter plate. Something a decent engineering shop should be able to fabricate quite easily.

There used to be loads of info on the Powertrain website but that is only a shadow of its former self. Web archive didn't turn up any useful detail.

tiger7

Original Poster:

5 posts

217 months

Wednesday 19th March 2008
quotequote all
Paul Drawmer said:
I think the 115 used a PG1 gearbox, which was also often fitted to the K series engines.

Maybe the way to go would be look for rwd drive trains that fit onto the K series.

Actually, due to the extra weight of a diesel.........
As for the extra weight, i wouldn't think it any heavier than a Ford 2.0L Pinto.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

279 months

Wednesday 19th March 2008
quotequote all
tiger7 said:
As for the extra weight, i wouldn't think it any heavier than a Ford 2.0L Pinto.
Probably not, but a small fraction of the power. The 1.4. and 1.5 normally aspirated Pug diesels were really pretty awful things.

tiger7

Original Poster:

5 posts

217 months

Wednesday 19th March 2008
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
tiger7 said:
As for the extra weight, i wouldn't think it any heavier than a Ford 2.0L Pinto.
Probably not, but a small fraction of the power. The 1.4. and 1.5 normally aspirated Pug diesels were really pretty awful things.
At 500kg max weight it would have roughly 100 bhp/tonne, not exactly a rocket, but ideal for dawdling about on a sunny day.

Kevp

587 posts

275 months

Wednesday 19th March 2008
quotequote all
Why not fit the existing package into a mid engine car? Or is a 7 style a must.

tiger7

Original Poster:

5 posts

217 months

Thursday 20th March 2008
quotequote all
Kevp said:
Why not fit the existing package into a mid engine car? Or is a 7 style a must.
A diesel powered 7, running on fuel recycled from the local chip shop, 50+ mpg,cheaper road tax, no nasty exhaust fumes! Power and speed ain't everything , still handle the same as a traditionally powered 7 just cheaper to run.