New or old bellhousing
New or old bellhousing
Author
Discussion

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Monday 21st April 2008
quotequote all
Can anyone tell me how you can identify a bellhousing as new or old just by looking at it?

fins, serial number etc?

brogenville

941 posts

231 months

Monday 21st April 2008
quotequote all
you can tell them apart by looking at the face which mates to the gearbox. The new style ones have one flush flat face containing all of the bolt holes, whereas the old ones have a flat face and bolt holes that are not directly connected to the rear face. Bit tricky to explain really, but post a pic and I can tell you which one you have.

Cerberowner

385 posts

243 months

Monday 21st April 2008
quotequote all
Sorry, can't help but I suspect they're all old ones now. I needed one recently and they're like rocking horse droppings to find new.

Byker28i

92,270 posts

247 months

Monday 21st April 2008
quotequote all
Silverstone Performance told me last week it's possible to mod the old ones to fit the race proved clutches, which was nice.

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Well modding the old ones seems to be a case of grinding down the bolt heads that hold the clutch plates together to give a few thou clearance on them hitting the casting. eek

Or at least I think thats right depending on whether I have a new or old bell housing in front of me. Got nothing to take pictures with at the mo.

Need a method of telling which one I have before I say anything definitive. frown

TT Tim

4,168 posts

277 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Okay, let's try this another way.

Here's my spare bellhousing, is it an early or late one, and what are the difference? Feel free to download the pic and mark on it and repost.

http://tvrcerbera.co.uk/Gallery/thumbnails.php?alb...





Tim

All photos used in this post © 2008 Tim Scrivens



Edited by TT Tim on Tuesday 22 April 10:37

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Thanks tim. Luckily got a camera today




Obviously are differences and my casting looks thicker but if you look at the arrangement of holes to bolt onto the engine and where they are placed in the casting I'm still not sure who has more room for the later clutch and therefore who's is the late and early model.

TT Tim

4,168 posts

277 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Okay, if I put those on my website Julian, that way, once we've worked out what's early and what's late we have a visual reference.

BTW what are your welding skills like?

Been thinking about this cross brace for the Cerb' biggrin

Tim

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Erumm, lets say, it'll never break but it'll never win a beauty contest. smile.

Honestly though it depends what material, what thickness, and how easy it is to get to.

I have the facility of MIG/TIG/or GAS, never worked out which I like the most so kept them all. You can bring some test bits along and have a go yourself or I'll do it and when you're happy with the test bits we can do it for real. smile


julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
TT Tim said:
Okay, if I put those on my website Julian, that way, once we've worked out what's early and what's late we have a visual reference.

BTW what are your welding skills like?

Been thinking about this cross brace for the Cerb' biggrin

Tim
As for the bellhousing you are welcome, but I have to warn you there are rumours of a mysterious third bellhousing.

By looking I would say you serial number is later than mine.

APMAUTO

368 posts

296 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
tims is an early one the second pic,s are of a late one

andy

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Thanks Andy. I was hoping we'd get an expert on this.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

I've got a late bellhousing.

If that is so.

Why does a raceproved, or indeed a standard normal clutch still need the bolts on the outer rim ground down to give it enough clearance to turn freely in mine.

I have the later flywheel with the indentation in, or at least did have before mike nicked it for his racecar smile. I had a late model clutch, and a standard looking slave cylinder, but small score marks running round the casting where the bolts had been touching.

edhorne

423 posts

314 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2008
quotequote all
Hi chaps

Be warned that there are 2 different slave cylinders aswell.

I posted a thread on this very subject in 2006 but all the pictures seem to have bad links (uncle Dave?).

When I get back to the UK I will try to repost but that won't be for a couple of weeks.

IIRC the older slave cylinder is longer because the old style clutch assembly was thinner than the new style. There's not much in it though but probably enough to give you a headache!

Cheers

Ed

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2008
quotequote all
Okay, but if I'd used an older slave cylinder in my 'new' bellhousing it'd have been longer and therefore less chance of the rear bolts fouling on the bellhousing? Maybe the clutch would have been slipping all the time but no fouling surely.


teamHOLDENracing

5,105 posts

297 months

Wednesday 23rd April 2008
quotequote all
Gents I have a spare bell housing if anyone ever needs one. And a flywheel.

Cheers

Andy