Performance comparison - 3.6 Tamora or 5.0 Chimaera Taraka??
Performance comparison - 3.6 Tamora or 5.0 Chimaera Taraka??
Author
Discussion

L33

Original Poster:

3,469 posts

254 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
Hi,
I'm seriously contemplating parting with my Chimaera 5.0, which has been Taraka'd. I love the peformance but hanker after the looks of more modern TVRs.
I'm thinking about a Tamora although I am concearned by the potential difference in performance. Is a standard 3.6 Tamora going to be a lot slower than my Chimaera 500 Taraka?

scratchchin

Many thanks in advance.
Lee.
thumbup

hollowpockets

5,910 posts

246 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
slower? Its likely to be just as quick...

Jasandjules

72,607 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
hollowpockets said:
slower? Its likely to be just as quick...
0-62 of Tamora is about 4.5? 5.0 is 4.2? SO with Taraka upgrade expect it to be a fair bit quicker?

S5TVR

1,239 posts

263 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
hollowpockets said:
slower? Its likely to be just as quick...
0-62 of Tamora is about 4.5? 5.0 is 4.2? SO with Taraka upgrade expect it to be a fair bit quicker?
In the real world I seriously doubt that there are many 500's that will hit 0-60mph in 4.2. I had a standard Chim 500 that was dyno'd at close to 300bhp and I reckon on a good day it would hit 60mph in 4.5s. Unless a Tam has the C/R box both cars will need a gear change to hit 60mph but the Tam change will be quicker than that of a Chim, but it loses out in torque. I doubt there would much to choose between a good 500 RV8 engine and a good 3.6 in a Tam.

shake n bake

2,221 posts

237 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
they're two totally different cars, with the right driver a tamora would run rings around a chim, the handling is superb. depends if you wanna stick with v8 grunt or if you want a new challenge??

hiltonig

3,153 posts

238 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
and also dare I say it running for cover some large sum of money in the bank for SP6 is pop moment, possilbly........

Jasandjules

72,607 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
S5TVR said:
In the real world I seriously doubt that there are many 500's that will hit 0-60mph in 4.2.
And in the real world what is the 0-60 of a Tamora? Genuine question.

Oh, and I've got 4.6 outta my 5.0 0-60 with about two tries, passenger timed though!

HarryW

16,034 posts

299 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
I'd say the Tam is the most underrated TVR, imhe it would have no trouble keeping up with a taraka and would probably overhaul most standard 500's.

pwd95

8,459 posts

268 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
My Griff 'feels' quicker than the 4.0 Tuscan I drove. Probably won't be if you put a stopwatch to them though. Just like the 450 felt sharper than the Griff until I tried to follow it along a local 'airstrip'. The Griff just slowly pulled away.

grahamw48

9,944 posts

268 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
Similar thing happened to me today.....bloody pushbike just went straight through the light, and I had to stop. irked


im

34,302 posts

247 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
I've been on long hoons behind a Tamora or two and even in my SC its closer than you might imagine so I don't think a Taraka will be beating one on the street. But it really depends on the driver. If you drive both I'm sure you'd find that if anything the Tamora will be slighly faster.

IMHO

Jasandjules

72,607 posts

259 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
But when we are talking about performance (or at least, the OP said performance), are we discussing 0-60 and 0-100 or point to point?

A Chimaera with decent suspension set up can handle quite well (I've only driven a Tamora in the damp/wet, and I found it twitchy, and risky, so didn't really open her up at all) - my new one feels like an Elise compared to my old one. And having switched from an Elise to the 5l I'm surprised at how comfortable the grip is.

VYT

585 posts

292 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
For me the difference between the RV8 cars and the AJP8 / S6 cars is that with the AJP and S6 you have to have the mind set that you are going to go quickly. With an RV8 car you can just press the loud pedal, any gear any speed and it feels quick. The AJP8, ('96 4.2) felt no quicker on the road than my old 4.0 Chim, the T350 again feel slower when driving sedately. However The T350 was 4 seconds quicker at Castle Combe than the Cerb, (T350 was limited to 6k RPM at the time) and the Cerb was 4 seconds quicker than I managed in the Chim.
If you have a mind to give a Tam it's head I think it would take a brave or better driver in a Chim or Griff to stay with you.

d.k.s

519 posts

242 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
Lee, you know the speed 6 route is the way to gowink
stick some sports pipes and decats on a tamora and you will understand you made the right choice thumbup

hollowpockets

5,910 posts

246 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
The supercharged chim didnt give my T350 much of a fight at knockhill

Del Del Del

12,728 posts

279 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
hollowpockets said:
The supercharged chim didnt give my T350 much of a fight at knockhill
Driver? New upgrade learning car/running in? or you have a very very fast 350 ??

Aowhs102

1,191 posts

231 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
I don't know about outright speed but my experience of, admitedly older, chims against my 51 plate Tam is that they dont even come close on the handling front. I love the SP6 to bits, sometimes literally, but the RV8 has truly amazing gobs of torque.

(Gobs being the technical term for lots of lb/ft.)

im

34,302 posts

247 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
Del Del Del said:
hollowpockets said:
The supercharged chim didnt give my T350 much of a fight at knockhill
Driver? New upgrade learning car/running in? or you have a very very fast 350 ??
He couldn't have been trying biggrin

Del Del Del

12,728 posts

279 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
im said:
He couldn't have been trying biggrin
maybe it was a 4ltr fodderwink

hollowpockets

5,910 posts

246 months

Wednesday 14th May 2008
quotequote all
my car was standard, rolling roaded with 343bhp and 297lb of torque. frown I do distinctly remember catching up over a couple of laps and passing on the start finish straight, the higher revs of the 6 allowed me to gain on him with every gearchange