Just wondering about specs...
Just wondering about specs...
Author
Discussion

CB-Dave

Original Poster:

1,002 posts

280 months

Wednesday 27th August 2003
quotequote all
Say you were on a road all laden with SPECS, and you were averaging a speed that was above the posted limit and of at least 3 pts and £60 rating.

What would happen if you bimbled along past all of the SPECS cameras, tripping each one in series?

If there were 10 cameras on the road, then would you end up with 15 points and a £300 fine, plus a ban through totting up, or would it be treat as one incident and you'd go away with 3pts and a £60 wonder?

wanty1974

3,704 posts

268 months

Wednesday 27th August 2003
quotequote all
According to www.speed-trap.co.uk a whole bank of cameras, if grouped together, count as one 'section'. The reason for the multiple cameras is there is more chance of catching you out. But, if you consistantly go over the limit, you'll only be done once per 'section'.

Flat in Fifth

47,491 posts

271 months

Wednesday 27th August 2003
quotequote all
wanty1974 said:
According to www.speed-trap.co.uk a whole bank of cameras, if grouped together, count as one 'section'. The reason for the multiple cameras is there is more chance of catching you out. But, if you consistantly go over the limit, you'll only be done once per 'section'.


Does that mean that by implication if it is two sections, say two sets of road works, then two separate offences occur, hence double pts & double fine?

If so, where is the natural justice in that? Where is the feedback to mend one’s ways? Not even a camera flash as feedback. Same applies to other systems, eg vans.

Or can one, like a burglar, ask to have other offences taken into consideration? Increased fine fair enough but one lot of points.

Author’s Note: I’m not supporting speeding, just have difficulty with cameras as they are being applied.

_Al_

5,618 posts

278 months

Wednesday 27th August 2003
quotequote all
Flat in Fifth said:
Author’s Note: I’m not supporting speeding



Why not?

Flat in Fifth

47,491 posts

271 months

Wednesday 27th August 2003
quotequote all
_Al_ said:

Flat in Fifth said:
Author’s Note: I’m not supporting speeding




Why not?


Sorry not going to bite.

wanty1974

3,704 posts

268 months

Wednesday 27th August 2003
quotequote all
If I remember correctly, as per the M25 variable speed limit, if you are 'flashed' by, say, three cameras, you get 'done' three times as each camera is guarding a variable speed limit, albeit a continuous one.

So if you went through two 'sections' of SPECS whilst speeding, you in theory could be done twice. I do believe, though, that people have had multiple flashes combined into one fine by the courts IF they had a good excuse for going so fast over such a long distance... most people it seems do indeed get the accumulative points for each 'flash'.

A bugger, eh? I say, find the longest stretch of SPECS on a 70 limit and do 99 the whole way.