down sized....

[WhoreLex]

From this:


To this:



1.2 of 3 cylinder power

It's sporty and dynamic in comparison to the LS

Comes with most of the same equipment save electric heated seats and electric mirrors.

Loving it so far!

[BeerForBreakfast]

Should save you a few quid. Do you miss the Lexus yet?

[Baffled Spoon]

Looks very smart. I love the trum-iness of the engine on those. One question though, are you going to change your profile name to weSeat now?

Edited to add; damn that swear filter, I can't even type another PHers profile name without it having a go.

Edited by Baffled Spoon on Sunday 15th June 14:24

[paul26982]

hadf one as a courtosy car, found it hammered the juice

[Negative Creep]

I can't see anything

[KieronGsi]

Negative Creep said:

I can't see anything

Youve done superbly well to write that post then.






















lol

[WhoreLex]

BeerForBreakfast said:

Should save you a few quid. Do you miss the Lexus yet?

Nope oddly enough, granted the soundproofing is poor in comparison to the lexus (unsuprisingly), changing gear for myself is odd and it doesnt have much torque to speak of.

but in all other regards I think its the better car.

Just a shame it doesnt have a V8, but the rumble of the 3 cyl is quite pleasing.

In an agricultural sort of way.

[PurelyRetro]

As much as that is nice, your still missing all the charm that the Reliant Robin had

[WhoreLex]

true true, but this may provide better crash protection

[WhoreLex]

Also

I don't think this thing uses petrol!

put in £30 over the weekend took it over half way and the guage hasnt moved since.

I used to easily do £20 of fuel in a day or so's driving in the LS400.

[Globulator]

weLex said:

It's odd that the photo is copyright, unless the original photographer is autotrader I can't see their ownership claim holding up.

Not sure I'd be happy sending in my pictures so they could claim ownership of them.. particularly if I was paying them for the advert too.

Nice car BTW!

[WhoreLex]

yeah its the shot that the garage took, havent had a chance to take a picture myself yet

thanks

I imagine in the t&c's you surrender any rights over the image to autotrader.

Edited by weLex on Tuesday 17th June 13:52

[MrMoonyMan]

Enjoying the surprisingly funky induction noise?

[SamHH]

Globulator said:

It's odd that the photo is copyright, unless the original photographer is autotrader I can't see their ownership claim holding up.

Not sure I'd be happy sending in my pictures so they could claim ownership of them.. particularly if I was paying them for the advert too.

Auto Trader terms and conditions said:

The copyright in all adverts (including text and photographs) shall be owned by us and you hereby assign all such copyright to us.

[Globulator]

SamHH said:

Globulator said:

It's odd that the photo is copyright, unless the original photographer is autotrader I can't see their ownership claim holding up.

Not sure I'd be happy sending in my pictures so they could claim ownership of them.. particularly if I was paying them for the advert too.

Auto Trader terms and conditions said:

The copyright in all adverts (including text and photographs) shall be owned by us and you hereby assign all such copyright to us.

Interestingly pathetic. Not convinced it would stand up in court.
MySpace tried that one and were forced to change their terms...

[MJO]

KieronGsi said:

Negative Creep said:

I can't see anything

Youve done superbly well to write that post then.
















lol

Possibly the funniest thing I've ever read, superb!