best way to sell R300 at moment ?

best way to sell R300 at moment ?

Author
Discussion

sjr-997

Original Poster:

310 posts

214 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
am not finding it easy to sell my R300. some interest via ebay and pistonheads, caterham dealers aren't interested it seems, but I need to sell it due to a house purchase. has anyone got any inspiration on where to sell it ? Im not a member of blatchat as I haven't registered - it didn't seem to make much differene if i am selling it. thanks simon

fergus

6,430 posts

276 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
sjr-997 said:
am not finding it easy to sell my R300. some interest via ebay and pistonheads, caterham dealers aren't interested it seems, but I need to sell it due to a house purchase. has anyone got any inspiration on where to sell it ? Im not a member of blatchat as I haven't registered - it didn't seem to make much differene if i am selling it. thanks simon
I think the guys on blatchat are probably the best informed in terms of mkt value and/or potential buyers. For the sake of £25 (or however much it is these days to join), it may be worth it? If nothing else, it gives you another place for an advert.

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Price it correctly. How much are you asking for it?

I am not as dialled in to R300 prices, but imagine that they must be pitched betweem SL and SLR/R400 prices - I'd say take a median of 2 prices of SLs and R400s that are the same year as yours.

normalbloke

7,477 posts

220 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
See here...


http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

You've picked possibly the worst time to sell a "toy" type item.It's a buyer's paradise.
Either price it to sell(most people are too stubborn/proud/scared of the depreciation) or be prepared to sit on it, for quite a while.

Good luck.

will_

6,027 posts

204 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
rubystone said:
Price it correctly. How much are you asking for it?

I am not as dialled in to R300 prices, but imagine that they must be pitched betweem SL and SLR/R400 prices - I'd say take a median of 2 prices of SLs and R400s that are the same year as yours.
This is good advice - I think the car needs to be sub £20k for a quick sale, this year I can only think of one R300 that has made over £20k.

Also your advert could be better structured/worded. The pictures are low resolution and not great. Perhaps some new pics and new wording would help with the sale. Also the information on the service history is limited - not sure being serviced by Ferrari really helps....

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Ah, found the advert. Don't forget that your price is close to R400 money - a couple have sold this year on PH for that money or even less. I'm sure they had covered more miles than yours and may not be as nice, but....

catgreenhorse

42 posts

232 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Some of this might be stating the obvious but I think some posters have missed something and that might be down to your ad.

A car in this spec is usually north of £20K. Its an SV they seem to attract stonger prices. Make more of this in the ad (title).
Its a late model,low mileage it has VVC, some potential buyers want Roller barrel R300/400/500 so poss less attractive to some.

Drop mention of Ferrari service- so what, better off FSH.

Hang on if you can afford to , if you need £ for the house then move it on.
25-35 days to shift a £22k toy is not unreasonable. But at this level many potential owners may want reassurance of dealer , e.g Caterham specialist warranty/goodwill to fix any potential issue.

You are at the right end of the country in many ways, many prospective buyers do not want to travel down south where most cars seem to be for sale at present. Or if you are close to Leeds Bradford why not offer to pay travel exp, one way fare for buyer?

Good luck,
Regards
Rich


rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Ah - SV and no roller barrels. Did they make an "R300" in that spec then? I thought all R300s were 160 bhp roller barreled cars - a nice balance of power and equipment.....is this car badeg as an "R300" then?

sjr-997

Original Poster:

310 posts

214 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
super feedback, really appreciate it ! will re-word the advert. it is an R300 SV. from the calls i've had people really want SV's.

I had it triple checked by caterham factory before I bought it, its definately an R300.

maybe a stupid question, but how do i tell if its got roller barrels ? i had it serviced at fezzer garage as it was closer then driving to leicester and i was busy getting ready for Le Mans that week :-) if they can fix a ferrari enzo they can fix a flippin caterham ! well, you'd like to think so !

i think based on the spec, condition, colour, mileage and age you won't find a better value less than two year old caterham in the UK for sale anywhere...I know I've checked first ! i need to sell it, but i love it so much I am finding any which way i can to keep hold of it...i finally have the massive garage i always wanted...and its a shame to have to get rid..to pay for the massive garage !

will_

6,027 posts

204 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all
rubystone said:
Ah - SV and no roller barrels. Did they make an "R300" in that spec then? I thought all R300s were 160 bhp roller barreled cars - a nice balance of power and equipment.....is this car badeg as an "R300" then?
Not all R300s had roller barrels. Not sure that they made an SV version of the R300 though?

WRT the wording, I would suggest you start with a brief introduction to the car, history, why it's for sale etc. Then move on to an exterior description (incl extras), then interior, then mechanical, then history. Then a brief summary. It will be a lot clearer to read, and people can mentally "tick off" what they are looking for that the car has.

fergus

6,430 posts

276 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all
sjr-997 said:
how do i tell if its got roller barrels ?
Check out http://members.aol.com/dvandrews/kengine.htm#r500t... Do your throttle bodies look like these?



CanAm

9,298 posts

273 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all
will_ said:
Not all R300s had roller barrels. Not sure that they made an SV version of the R300 though?
Surely the easy to confirm it was a factory-built R300 would be to check digits 8/9 of the VIN number are "R3"?

drakart

1,735 posts

211 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all
[quote=will
Not all R300s had roller barrels. Not sure that they made an SV version of the R300 though?
quote]

My dad has one. there arent too many about, but they do exist.smokin

sjr-997

Original Poster:

310 posts

214 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all
the chassis number has RC not R3 in it. The factory have confirmed based on the chassis number and the original owner's name, its an R300 superlight. it has also references to R300 on the original order details. Its definately an SV model.

sjr-997

Original Poster:

310 posts

214 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all

CanAm

9,298 posts

273 months

Thursday 3rd July 2008
quotequote all
sjr-997 said:
the chassis number has RC not R3 in it. The factory have confirmed based on the chassis number and the original owner's name, its an R300 superlight. it has also references to R300 on the original order details. Its definately an SV model.
Well, you can't say fairer than that. RC = Rover VVC

CanAm

9,298 posts

273 months

Sunday 6th July 2008
quotequote all
As a non-member, you can still advertise your car in the Lotus 7 Club Magazine, 'Low Flying', for a £10 fee. That should reach a market of buyers who are looking to upgrade. I can e-mail details if you are interested.

Fat Arnie

1,655 posts

264 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
If the 160bhp Roller Barrel K was in an SV chassis, it would not be an R300. The SV chassis is quite a bit heavier.

I'd never pay more for an SV chassis car, simply because they do not have the handling of the narrow chassis cars.

1st_petrolhead

1,430 posts

239 months

Saturday 12th July 2008
quotequote all
Fat Arnie said:
I'd never pay more for an SV chassis car, simply because they do not have the handling of the narrow chassis cars.
Interesting comment. Do you know this as being fact or like me just prefer the S3 narrow chassis?

dino ferrana

791 posts

253 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
Arnie prefers the S3 chassis I think, his bold statment is not one that is a universally acknowledged truth. Many Seven owners have a strange aversion to the SV, despite it being every bit as good to drive. I have heard many talk about the SV like some kind of ridiculous idea that only the very fat should want or need. It escapes many of them that there are some big guys out there who will not fit in a standard car even with lowered floors, foam seats etc. Also the SV has more space, bigger boot and bigger fuel tank, so it makes a fair bit of sense for longer journeys etc.

They did make factory badged R300s in an SV chassis, they would be a bit shy of 300bhp/ton, but they are not that much heavier, with about 25 kilos extra as standard. This is spread all over the chassis, so is not as detrimental to handling as adding it all in one place like with some engine choices. Many find the SV's handling to be a little more stable and predictable due to the extra track width.