RE: Asti Martin
Tuesday 1st July 2008

Asti Martin

Prince Charles runs his Aston Martin on wine



Prince Charles has started running his classic Aston Martin DB5 on wine, it has been revealed. The drop-top Aston was given to him by the Queen on his 21st birthday in 1969 and has now been overhauled to make it more environmentally friendly.

The conversion of the 15mpg car was listed in the Prince’s annual review as one of the methods he took to reduce his carbon emissions last year by 18%. The car apparently now runs on ‘100% bioethanol made from surplus wine’.

According to Sir Michael Peat, the Prince’s private secretary, the wine was not leftovers from parties but came from a vineyard in Wiltshire. ‘I think the wine is surplus English wine,’ he said. ‘It’s wonderful. It’s not corked.’

It is understood that the eco-friendly fuel burns nearly 10% more efficiently than petrol and makes the car go 15mph faster. It is also cheaper than petrol at £1.10 a litre.

James Hygate, managing director of Greenfuels, the firm that sells the fuel, said: ‘We were asked whether it would be possible to run the Prince’s Aston Martin on a waste product. We have come up with a means by which ordinary white wine can be converted into bioethanol which can be used as a fuel.’

Author
Discussion

tegwin

Original Poster:

1,680 posts

228 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Good on him!

Someone up high who can still enjoy a good car and do their bit for the environment at the same time...


Just think...the world oil shortage could be solved by converting all that terrible french plonk into bioethanol!

sprinter885

11,550 posts

249 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Hardly massive cost saving tho'
Maybe Charlie's just doing it for the extra mph.
HEY ! Perhaps he's a PHer !! Are you out there Mr Windsor?
Quick send him a free Smiley.

"One's Speed Matters"

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

249 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?

Redneck Rocket

998 posts

229 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Maybe I could run my Spitfire on Carlsberg Special Brew?

Steve_F

872 posts

216 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Wonder what the cost to the taxpayer was for this toorolleyes

Just wonder how often he actually uses a classic like that. Wonder if it was really worth doing or just trying to show he cares for the environment.

motormania

1,143 posts

275 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
maybe you should read the article again. At no point does it lecture us, just shows that he's doing his bit.

OK it could be said that he goes on about the environment elsewhere, so fair point, but at least he's trying.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

220 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
Actually I think it's a sensible view he's taken. Rather than chop it in for a Pious, he's using a car that he's owned for the last 30 odd years. I respect him more for that than for taking the pseudo green route, which is truly hypocritical.

BigBen

12,110 posts

252 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
Actually I think it's a sensible view he's taken. Rather than chop it in for a Pious, he's using a car that he's owned for the last 30 odd years. I respect him more for that than for taking the pseudo green route, which is truly hypocritical.
Seconded, shows he has considered the so called cradle to grave environmental impact of his car and shown you can have a nice motor powered by alternative fuel.

As for the 'spongers' comment shouldn't you be posting on the socialist worker forumwink

Ben

motormania

1,143 posts

275 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Steve_F said:
Wonder what the cost to the taxpayer was for this toorolleyes

Just wonder how often he actually uses a classic like that. Wonder if it was really worth doing or just trying to show he cares for the environment.
60p

That's how much of your personal tax when on the whole Royal Family last year. Money well spent I think. Besides, he does a huge amount for young people through his Prince's Trust.

Maybe you should be asking how much of your tax last year went to pay for the salaries, and expenses of all the T W A T S in parliment, not to mention all those who now live a nice life off the pension!! Oh and don't forget all the civil serants and their pensions too. That's the real disgrace - I wonder if we will ever know that figure!!!?

Magners P.H

6,634 posts

236 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Corker of a car

getmecoat

peteA

2,757 posts

256 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
[quote=Steve_F]Wonder what the cost to the taxpayer was for this toorolleyes

Cut the guy some slack on this one - he might have a few opinions that up set some but at least its an effort in the right direction...

Havent some figures been released recently about how much the royal family cost each tax payer....wasn't it only 60p each or something...? seems OK to me?

I spend more on petrol and wine....

Mike400

1,026 posts

253 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
Charles has been dabbling in eco living for years, the aston is just the latest in a long line of "experiments" he has conducted

What it does prove is that ANY car can be made to run in a slightly more environmentally friendly way, he is more in touch than most in that he understands that we petrolheads dont want to give up our fast motors.

Also I doubt very much he uses the aston as a daily driver....

stu_the_flat

1,167 posts

240 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
What is surplus wine?

sprinter885

11,550 posts

249 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
Redneck Rocket said:
Maybe I could run my Spitfire on Carlsberg Special Brew?
Certainly NOT- how dare you sir. It's meant for drinkwink
This man has the right idea
stu_the_flat said:
What is surplus wine?
Edited by sprinter885 on Tuesday 1st July 12:23

900T-R

20,406 posts

279 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
BigBen said:
rhinochopig said:
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
Actually I think it's a sensible view he's taken. Rather than chop it in for a Pious, he's using a car that he's owned for the last 30 odd years. I respect him more for that than for taking the pseudo green route, which is truly hypocritical.
Seconded, shows he has considered the so called cradle to grave environmental impact of his car and shown you can have a nice motor powered by alternative fuel.
Thirded - well done Sir! thumbup

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

220 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
sprinter885 said:
Redneck Rocket said:
Maybe I could run my Spitfire on Carlsberg Special Brew?
Certainly NOT- how dare you sir. It's meant for drinkwink
I thought it was meant for:


bales

1,905 posts

240 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
Actually I think it's a sensible view he's taken. Rather than chop it in for a Pious, he's using a car that he's owned for the last 30 odd years. I respect him more for that than for taking the pseudo green route, which is truly hypocritical.
Exactly my view on all this green car rubbish, far better to stick with older cars that can be converted to run more cleanly than to spend lots of money on a "eco-friendly" or "hybrid" type that has a huge carbon footprint if you take into account the entire life-cycle of the vehicle.

I guess if he had bought an economical small car there would have been lots of people saying that he had done it just for show and to give the impression he is making an effort!

Edited by bales on Tuesday 1st July 12:25

J111

3,354 posts

237 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash
It is, because the energy costs of production aren't zero, but think about where the carbon in the grapes came from in the first place.


Twincam16

27,647 posts

280 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
I always knew there was a use for Lambrini.

cat@10

141 posts

230 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
900T-R said:
BigBen said:
rhinochopig said:
kevin ritson said:
More proof of how out of touch these spongers are. I don't have any truck with him running an Aston but lecturing us on saving the planet whilst running a 15mpg car (it's still putting C02 into the atmosphere, Charlie smash) is a tad hypocritical, no?
Actually I think it's a sensible view he's taken. Rather than chop it in for a Pious, he's using a car that he's owned for the last 30 odd years. I respect him more for that than for taking the pseudo green route, which is truly hypocritical.
Seconded, shows he has considered the so called cradle to grave environmental impact of his car and shown you can have a nice motor powered by alternative fuel.
Thirded - well done Sir! thumbup
Fourthed - Finally a thread with some positive replies. A cynical point of view has been taken far too often on this site recently.