BT connection charge
Author
Discussion

raf_gti

Original Poster:

4,258 posts

237 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
I've recently moved into a new build and after speaking to BT initially I was told that a connection charge of £125 would be made due to having an engineer visit to connect the lines.

Two weeks later (and after they initially lost the order on the system!) I got a call saying the phone line was active and no engineer visit was required due to lines already being in place, great I thought, no charge and the BT monkey agreed.

Lo and behold, when the bill came through the charge was there. Called BT and again BT monkey agreed that no connection charge would be made, that a note would be placed on my account and the payment altered.

Thinking no more of it until I checked my bank statement, can you guess what happened? YES! The full payment went out at the end of June. Obviously just having moved house finances are a bit delicate and naievly I did not provision for that bill to come out so I am now an extra £60 down in bank charges, not happy in the slightest about this.

Spoke with BT monkeys today and amazingly they have no record on the system of them ever saying the call charge was not required. Unfortunately the indian based gentleman I spoke with was particulary un-helpful and could only offer 'but it's not on the system' 'but it's not on the system'. Even after he spoke to a supervisor no help was forthcoming.

Do any of you out there no if a charge for connection should of been made? I've had two previous lines activated in the past and there was no charge made, both due to having lines that were connected. Does the fact this is a new build have any bearing?

ta

Steve

MitchT

17,162 posts

240 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
When I move I'm not going to bother with a land line, I'll just get a contract on my mobile with plenty of free minutes on evenings and weekends. Of Course, I will need broadband though I'm not quite sure how I'm going to achieve that yet.

Tim.s

753 posts

233 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Your first mistake was calling BT in the first place!! Surprised they even answered the phone!

I never want them in my life again, i'd rather not have a phone than deal with BT.

Riknos

4,701 posts

235 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Bullst. They will charge you. If a line has been dead for a period of time, it'll cost you. If the previous people moved out within 2 ish months, then the line should be stopped, and all it requires is switching back on at the network. If its been longer, then it'll be ceased, and will have used the cables at exchange for another site, so will have to have exchange work done thus the charge will still be there, despite the fact you haven't had a new line installed.

m4tthew

9,045 posts

233 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
MitchT said:
When I move I'm not going to bother with a land line, I'll just get a contract on my mobile with plenty of free minutes on evenings and weekends. Of Course, I will need broadband though I'm not quite sure how I'm going to achieve that yet.
Sky or Virgin for cable broadband.

Im with Virgin for tv and bb, we dont need a landline as we both have mobiles with plenty of minutes, oh and I cut through the phone line, oops!

911motorsport

7,251 posts

264 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
I have experienced this with my BT Business accounts. They tie you up for ages on the phone. After you've proved the billing errors they agree to get it all amended. Following month, a threatening letter arrives rolleyes ad infinitum

Edited by 911motorsport on Friday 4th July 12:55

Wacky Racer

41,411 posts

278 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Tim.s said:
Your first mistake was calling BT in the first place!! Surprised they even answered the phone!
rofl

raf_gti

Original Poster:

4,258 posts

237 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Riknos said:
Bullst. They will charge you. If a line has been dead for a period of time, it'll cost you. If the previous people moved out within 2 ish months, then the line should be stopped, and all it requires is switching back on at the network. If its been longer, then it'll be ceased, and will have used the cables at exchange for another site, so will have to have exchange work done thus the charge will still be there, despite the fact you haven't had a new line installed.
Yup, yup and yup.

Whilst I didn't want to pay the charge initially I accepted it as part of the new house cost.

However, to be told subsequently that a charge would not be made and to then make the financial arrangement's is what has really got me mad


Tim.s

753 posts

233 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
911motorsport said:
I have experienced this with my BT Business accounts. They tie you up for ages on the phone. After youve proved the billing errors they agree to get it all ammended.Following month, a threatening letter arrives rolleyes ad infinitum
You actually got them on the phone? I (and this is true) had to take an afternoon off work to call them after a quick lunchtime call turned into a marathon.


911motorsport

7,251 posts

264 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Tim.s said:
911motorsport said:
I have experienced this with my BT Business accounts. They tie you up for ages on the phone. After youve proved the billing errors they agree to get it all ammended.Following month, a threatening letter arrives rolleyes ad infinitum
You actually got them on the phone? I (and this is true) had to take an afternoon off work to call them after a quick lunchtime call turned into a marathon.

Happens all the time! Quite clever really, they've passed the labour costs of sorting things out on to their customers.

tonyvid

9,889 posts

274 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Yep, I had a new house that was wired and connected to the excahnge for BT and NTL, BT wanted £135 to connect and NTL £10.

RDE

5,037 posts

245 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
I had this at a student house. For a start the £125 connection charge was dubious but I can't remember why. They main thing was that when the broadband didn't start when it should have done, I called and asked them to why. They sent an engineer, and charged me for it. It was their fking fault! I relayed this to them, and they said they'd remove it, but didn't and kept adding it back to the bills. It took many hours of painful telephone queuing to persuade them enough to get rid of it. Consequently, I shall never be using their 'services' ever again.

I worry that you actually need a BT line to have broadband though - is this the case?

JulianHJ

8,871 posts

293 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Will local loop unbundling eventually mean we can cut BT right out of the equation?

They're a total shower of b@$t@rds and if I could avoid ever using them again I would. However with no Virgin network available I'm a bit stuck.

Simpo Two

93,068 posts

296 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Never, EVER, set up a DD with BT.

They will take too much and you will spend the rest of your life trying to get it back. Fact.

Hedders

24,460 posts

278 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
I used to have a BT line + BT Broadband. One month i could not afford the phone bill so i paid the internet bill so they didn't cancel that.

They cancelled the phone line AND the internet contract ("you don't have a phone line, so we thought we would cancel your internet account").

They actually expected me to renew both accounts, at a cost of hundreds of extra pounds when you factor in another 12 month interent contract! Needless to say, I did not renew the accounts and no longer directly use BT for anything.

Idiots.


_Batty_

12,268 posts

281 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Riknos said:
Bullst. They will charge you. If a line has been dead for a period of time, it'll cost you. If the previous people moved out within 2 ish months, then the line should be stopped, and all it requires is switching back on at the network. If its been longer, then it'll be ceased, and will have used the cables at exchange for another site, so will have to have exchange work done thus the charge will still be there, despite the fact you haven't had a new line installed.
  • *WRONG***
sorry but this is not true.
we had a line that had been ceased for 6months, and had the same issue. we were told we needed to pay £125 new connection charge.
however after talking to a british chap (ask for an engineer) he told me that they *cannot charge* unless repair work to the cable or a new cable is needed.

Find a british engineer is the hard part (took me 5 different people)

Matt

SidewaysSid

523 posts

289 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
I use O2 and after a cock-up wth the standing order initially they admitted it was their fauly without too much hassle and offered to credit us for the first two months.

You could have knocked me down wiv a feva!

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Never, EVER, set up a DD with BT.

They will take too much and you will spend the rest of your life trying to get it back. Fact.
This man *Points at ST* speaks the truth. When I got a phone line with them the guy on the phone didn't seem to comprehend that I wanted to pay by debit card rather than a monthly DD. After a 10 minute debate, he finally agreed to do it. BT then called me every 2 days telling me that I should switch to their precious DD system, offering me every incentive possible, short of a free blowjob. I stuck this out for a fortnight until I finally lost my temper and told the poor bloke on the phone (literally) to fk off and do as he was toldrolleyes

The moral of the story is, NEVER put yourself in a situation where you have to speak to BT on the phone. No matter how grave the problem, it's not worth the temper-fraying experience that is the BT call centre. This centre is an evil place of dark magic and witchcraft SO STRONG that it can turn calm, reasonable people into shoutingg, swearing lunatics in no time at all. I say we have them all executed.

GTIR

24,741 posts

297 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
Dont bother with BT, go with http://www.utilitywarehouse.co.uk

Top notch.

Thudd

3,100 posts

238 months

Friday 4th July 2008
quotequote all
m4tthew said:
Sky or Virgin for cable broadband.

Im with Virgin for tv and bb, we dont need a landline as we both have mobiles with plenty of minutes, oh and I cut through the phone line, oops!
With SKY you need a BT line.

With Virgin they monitor your internet usage and report you to the BPI if they think you're downloading stuff you shouldn't be.
They also cap bandwidth at peak times.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/techdigest/20080612/ttc-b...