De-catting a 325i E36
De-catting a 325i E36
Author
Discussion

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
I've recently picked up a 1992 J reg 325i

I was wondering if it would be worth me removing the cats to gain a little bit more power, as I understand pre August 1994 cars don't need them to pass the MOT. Is the process just as simple as cutting them off and replacing them with 2 sections of straight through pipe?

Does anyone know what the likely power, torque and MPG gains would be like?

E30M3SE

8,493 posts

225 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
sniff petrol said:
I've recently picked up a 1992 J reg 325i

I was wondering if it would be worth me removing the cats to gain a little bit more power, as I understand pre August 1994 cars don't need them to pass the MOT. Is the process just as simple as cutting them off and replacing them with 2 sections of straight through pipe?

Does anyone know what the likely power, torque and MPG gains would be like?
Your's requires the CAT for MOT, it's either August 1992 that the compulsory ACT came in or Jan 1993, can't remember which.

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
Various sources on the net are saying either auguse 92 or 94. Either way I think I should be fine as mine's a Feb 92 vehicle.

bob1179

14,138 posts

238 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
I always thought the law regarding Cats actually came into effect on 1st January 1993.

Might be worth asking on SP&L.

bob1179

14,138 posts

238 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
Just pulled this off from here: http://www.motester.co.uk/mot-qanda.html

EMISSIONS WITHOUT CAT
I own a Honda CRX Civic Del Sol 1992 K reg and I am having a stainless steel exhaust built and fitted. The fitter has said to me because the car is a 1992 model and the law that governs the catalytic converters for the MOT came into effect in 1993, the car does not fall into this law, and I could remove the cat and it would still pass the MOT. Is he correct or will it fail the emissions Test. Thanks, Ben.
Your fitter is not quite correct. The MOT regulations say nothing about a vehicle having a catalytic converter. They merely set emission levels which have to be achieved if the vehicle is first used after a specific year. Certainly some cars with every efficient engines could achieve the required emission levels without a catalytic converter. However in your case, if your vehicle’s year is before the break year, then should the cat be removed, in all probabilty it should not affect the MOT. – MOTT

smile

phelix

4,681 posts

278 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
sniff petrol said:
Does anyone know what the likely power, torque and MPG gains would be like?
Likely negligible.

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
phelix said:
sniff petrol said:
Does anyone know what the likely power, torque and MPG gains would be like?
Likely negligible.
So would you bother then, bearing in mind that the current exhaust is in good condition.

Chassis 33

6,194 posts

311 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
sniff petrol said:
So would you bother then
Aural pleasure. Cats muffle things a bit.
Regards
Iain

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
Chassis 33 said:
sniff petrol said:
So would you bother then
Aural pleasure. Cats muffle things a bit.
Regards
Iain
I already have 1.5 metres of flexible exhaust tube, and can get about £50 for the old cat. Suppose the power increase would be a bonus then if anything.

Pentoman

4,835 posts

292 months

Friday 18th July 2008
quotequote all
This is a 190bhp version presumably? Perhaps if they made both cat and non-cat versions that will tell you something. I believe that for the similar capacity 2.5 cossie Merc, a non-"KAT" version like mine is 150KW or 204PS, while a KAT version is 143KW or 194PS, so it looks like you might gain 9 or 10 bhp, however I'm not certain if there may have been other differences between the KAT and non KAT versions when it comes to these Mercs.

For the 2.6 Merc the difference is 5KW, about 7bhp.

Wonder how much power there is to be freed from one of these 325s as 190 is a good figure already. What RPM is max power at?

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Friday 18th July 2008
quotequote all
Pentoman said:
This is a 190bhp version presumably? Perhaps if they made both cat and non-cat versions that will tell you something. I believe that for the similar capacity 2.5 cossie Merc, a non-"KAT" version like mine is 150KW or 204PS, while a KAT version is 143KW or 194PS, so it looks like you might gain 9 or 10 bhp, however I'm not certain if there may have been other differences between the KAT and non KAT versions when it comes to these Mercs.

For the 2.6 Merc the difference is 5KW, about 7bhp.

Wonder how much power there is to be freed from one of these 325s as 190 is a good figure already. What RPM is max power at?
According to the handbook it makes 192 bhp @ 5900 rpm and 181 lb/ft @ 4200

It had a replacement SH engine less than two years ago and it seems like a good'un. Would be nice to get a nice round 200 bhp.

Pentoman

4,835 posts

292 months

Friday 18th July 2008
quotequote all
Those are good figures, the Merc claims 204PS at 6200 rpm, and i think torque of only 177 lb ft peak at apparently something silly like 5200 or 5500 rpm ?? I guess that's progress, as the BMW has much more advanced management and probably a longer stroke.

carlosvalderrama

198 posts

227 months

Saturday 19th July 2008
quotequote all
It could well depend on the age and condition of the cat. If it's ancient, you could have some collapsed cores in there and generally a load of sooty ste, so whipping it off will help a lot. If it's as clean as a whistle you might find no difference.

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Saturday 19th July 2008
quotequote all
Apparently a scrapyard will pay £80 for my old cats, as long as I won't actually loose power then that's all the motivation I need. driving

carlosvalderrama

198 posts

227 months

Sunday 20th July 2008
quotequote all
See if he'll swap them for a set of 328i headers. The 2.5 has old skool cast sausage headers, the 2.8 has tubular. According to the wise sages on the internerd it's a worthwhile change, but you probably need to fiddle with the intake a bit and play with the maps to get the best of it all.

sniff petrol

Original Poster:

13,125 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Just to update I spent this afternoon taking the cats off and replacing the section with some straight through pipes. The car produces a lovely rasp now that adds to the induction noise from the big cone filter, I put the induction kit on first and it seems to make a bit of difference to the power high up in the rev-range, seems faster revving over about 3000rpm. The de-cat to be honest doesn't seem to have made any difference to the power or running of the engine, just noise as the only silencer is the large back box. If I wasn't getting £80 for my old cats from the scrapyard then I wouldn't have bothered.