Is the FIA biased in favour of the red cars?
Poll: Is the FIA biased in favour of the red cars?
Total Members Polled: 155
Discussion
stephen300o said:
Scuffers said:
stephen300o said:
How paranoid is PH?
well, if you consider that most of the FIA tech dept is either Ferarri people or ex-Ferarri, they pay the rent on the FIA's offices, Mad Max has stated that he preffers the reds, then I think it's quite reasonable?
don't you?

Which facts above don't you agree with?
Which aspects do you think are irrelevant to any suggestion of vested interests?
IainT said:
Last season I think it was clear although that may well not be the FIA per se but Rampant Mosely driving things.
This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Letting Raikkonen stay out in France with his exhaust pipe flapping around for 30 laps?This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Any other team would have seen their car black-flagged.
flemke said:
IainT said:
Last season I think it was clear although that may well not be the FIA per se but Rampant Mosely driving things.
This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Letting Raikkonen stay out in France with his exhaust pipe flapping around for 30 laps?This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Any other team would have seen their car black-flagged.
I'm a McMerc fanboy (to appropriate the 'insult' from the tifosi here) but I don't see strong bias in their favour this season. Maybe (with my paranoid hat on) the Red Team's lack of pace int eh last two races has robbed the authorities of opportunities to promote them ahead of Ron's boys!
One could argue that the lack of flagging Webber's car while it spewed it's guts before failing was consistant with not flagging the Plodding Donkey. From my view though your example is a good one of Ferarri benefiting from a bad call by the stewards.
RobbieMeister said:
I wondered why the safety car stayed out so long yesterday.
The stewards have been critisied before for bringing the SC back in while back-markers were still catching up with the tail of the field having been allowed to unlap themselves...It certainly seemed to potentially disadvantage LH but, as he didn't have that much fuel in reserve (conmpared to what most of us had assumed) then 'conspiracy' is a bit too paranoid even for PH!
IainT said:
flemke said:
IainT said:
Last season I think it was clear although that may well not be the FIA per se but Rampant Mosely driving things.
This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Letting Raikkonen stay out in France with his exhaust pipe flapping around for 30 laps?This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Any other team would have seen their car black-flagged.
The lack of comparative data need not, however, deflect us from making a judgment about the situation in France. The rules are very clear that any car in a mechanical condition that poses an exceptional risk to others will be instructed to report to the pitlane, and an FIA technical inspector must approve the car before it returns to the track.
This did not happen - not only did the stewards fail to call in a car when its safety was in question but, worse, they allowed a car that was manifestly unsafe to carry on. The fact that the exhaust pipe eventually flew off randomly, and could have caused the death of a driver or spectator, proved beyond doubt that the stewards had acted in breach of their obligations.
flemke said:
IainT said:
flemke said:
IainT said:
Last season I think it was clear although that may well not be the FIA per se but Rampant Mosely driving things.
This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Letting Raikkonen stay out in France with his exhaust pipe flapping around for 30 laps?This season? Not on the surface - all in all it seems to me to be fair so far.
Any other team would have seen their car black-flagged.
The lack of comparative data need not, however, deflect us from making a judgment about the situation in France. The rules are very clear that any car in a mechanical condition that poses an exceptional risk to others will be instructed to report to the pitlane, and an FIA technical inspector must approve the car before it returns to the track.
This did not happen - not only did the stewards fail to call in a car when its safety was in question but, worse, they allowed a car that was manifestly unsafe to carry on. The fact that the exhaust pipe eventually flew off randomly, and could have caused the death of a driver or spectator, proved beyond doubt that the stewards had acted in breach of their obligations.
It's my view that the car should have been called in to the pits or that, during the pit stop, the mechanics should have made it safe.
Ferarri clearly gained from the (lack of) decision and there's nothign to show that the stewards would not have acted differently if it had been a Toyota, BWM or evil Mercedes.
Was there any justification by the race stewards after Magny Cours regarding the lack of action?
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




