BRUNSTROM caught with his pants down again
BRUNSTROM caught with his pants down again
Author
Discussion

mybrainhurts

Original Poster:

90,809 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
Remember the story about Brunny's intrepid probe into security at police HQ when he climbed scaffolding and broke in through an unlocked window...?

Wasn't quite what it seemed, it seems...Brunny was telling porkies...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1040987/Wh...


Before I go, look at the pic.

Does anyone know why Brunny's wearing a hat that says ARAF? That's Welsh for SLOW...

miniman

30,203 posts

293 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
vacuous daily mail reader said:
Brunstrom is probably a freemason and, as such, is above the law. The police authorities of the UK are rich in masonry and therefore the incident will be swept under the thick piled carpet of unaccountability, just as the vehicular homicides perpetrated by the traffic police are.
This may well be the case, but times are certainly changing. A lot of the new Police Stations I've seen lately are made of glass.

Andy Zarse

10,870 posts

278 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
"Earlier his wife had dispelled rumours of a marital split and divorce. She confirmed Mr Brunstrom was aware of our investigations but said he would not wish to talk about it.

Mrs Brunstrom laughed and added: ‘We’re not getting divorced – he’s too good in bed.’"


hurl

Pigeon

18,535 posts

277 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Does anyone know why Brunny's wearing a hat that says ARAF? That's Welsh for SLOW...
Yeah, should be CYNT which is Welsh for "quicker" and the Y is pronounced as a U.

mybrainhurts

Original Poster:

90,809 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th August 2008
quotequote all
Andy Zarse said:
Mrs Brunstrom laughed and added: ‘We’re not getting divorced – he’s too good in bed.’"
rofl


Mr Brunstrom, preparing to be good in bed ---->



Mr Brunstrom, after a night of being good in bed ---->

Puff Puff

23,214 posts

257 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
Britain's cycling gold medallist Nicole Cooke looks a bit tasty (ninth photo down to right of Brunstrom story).

Swilly

9,699 posts

305 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
What exactly is the story here !?

His key fob doesnt work, being a bit of a can-do-dick-head he decided to climb in, but is then confronted by his own police thinking he is breaking in.

A worst it is a bit embarrassing, but nothing more.

So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?

Brainstorm is a dick, but this story just looks like malice which is not what the press should be about.

league67

1,878 posts

234 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
Thats tasty ??




blowy84

564 posts

237 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
No change here, he's still a wierd tosser, wouldn't look out of place with a trolley full of old plastic bags wearing one shoe. wr.

Deltaf01

1,512 posts

228 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that

A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?

I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.


lord summerisle

8,174 posts

256 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
league67 said:
Thats tasty ??

well after 3 1/2hrs cycling in the rain, you'd look like a drowned rat too...

but Nicole is a lovely lass.


celticpilgrim

1,965 posts

274 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
That she may be, but it does appear that she has borrowed Rob Brydon's teeth in the second photo!!

Hedders

24,460 posts

278 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
I see your point. I think i am going to go and test the security at my companies head office tonight, I will let you know if the police believe my story.


Baby Huey

4,881 posts

230 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
So, a policeman lies, well so what?

Is that what you are saying swilly?

As in it happens all the time?


Puff Puff

23,214 posts

257 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
league67 said:
Thats tasty ??

The photo's were in the wrong place, aginst her story was this:


It's been corrected now.

mybrainhurts

Original Poster:

90,809 posts

286 months

Monday 11th August 2008
quotequote all
Just realised I didn't start this thread in the SP&L forum.....

Would it be a good idea to move it there now...?

Swilly

9,699 posts

305 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
Deltaf01 said:
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that

A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?

I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
Ummmm no it doesnt.

I lie all the time about minor things... because they are minor things.

Like, when asked "does my bum look big in this ?" the answer is of course " No " regardless of the truth.

mybrainhurts

Original Poster:

90,809 posts

286 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
Swilly said:
Deltaf01 said:
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that

A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?

I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
Ummmm no it doesnt.

I lie all the time about minor things... because they are minor things.

Like, when asked "does my bum look big in this ?" the answer is of course " No " regardless of the truth.
If you think Chief Constables should be anything less that wholly truthful, you need to examine your thoughts a little more closely.

This wasn't just a little fib, this was a deliberate press release to the national media that he knew to be untruthful, its purpose to allow him to save face.

Utter disgrace...sack him.

elster

17,517 posts

241 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Swilly said:
Deltaf01 said:
Swilly said:
So he concocted a story about testing security, well so what !?
Its known as "lying". If he's making a habit of doing it over something so minor as this and supressing the evidence by destroying it, then dosent that

A) Call into question his fitness as an officer?
B) Cast doubt on his truthfulness in a court of law?
C) Prove that indeed he really is a Richard Head?

I would suggest A, B and C. Get this plank out.
Ummmm no it doesnt.

I lie all the time about minor things... because they are minor things.

Like, when asked "does my bum look big in this ?" the answer is of course " No " regardless of the truth.
If you think Chief Constables should be anything less that wholly truthful, you need to examine your thoughts a little more closely.

This wasn't just a little fib, this was a deliberate press release to the national media that he knew to be untruthful, its purpose to allow him to save face.

Utter disgrace...sack him.
If you think the public need to know everything, you need to examine your thoughts a little more closely. wink

The media can make anything turn into a circus. The public don't need to know everything.

Do you really think he wrote the press release himself? Do you not think there is someone who does PR for them? SO if anyone it should be there job to go,not his.

Hedders

24,460 posts

278 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
elster said:
Do you really think he wrote the press release himself? Do you not think there is someone who does PR for them? SO if anyone it should be there job to go,not his.
Yeah, sack his PR guy...

talk about shooting the messenger!