RE: Flagship X6 Prices Announced
RE: Flagship X6 Prices Announced
Tuesday 12th August 2008

Flagship X6 Prices Announced

Twin-turbo X6 will cost almost £54K and can hit 60mph in 5.4 seconds



Prices have been announced for BMW’s flagship X6 - the twin-turbocharged xDrive50i. The car is aimed squarely at the Porsche Cayenne GTS and the supercharged Range Rover Sport and features a 4,395cc V8 powerplant.

The 402bhp xDrive50i will go on sale in November and will be £53,930 OTR. Its top speed is limited to 155mph and it can accelerate to 60mph in 5.4 seconds.

BMW says the car is 1.8 seconds quicker from zero than the Range Rover and with an emissions figure of 299g/km it is 75g/km cleaner. The Porsche in Tiptronic form is 1.4 seconds slower from zero to 62mph, 2.3mpg less efficient and, at 332g/km, it is 33g/km more polluting.

Author
Discussion

illmonkey

Original Poster:

19,819 posts

227 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
[quote]BMW says the car is 1.8 seconds quicker from zero than the Range Rover and with an emissions figure of 299g/km it is 75g/km cleaner. The Porsche in Tiptronic form is 1.4 seconds slower from zero to 62mph, 2.3mpg less efficient and, at 332g/km, it is 33g/km more polluting.

[/quote]

The BMW is also just as ugly and bulky as the porsche and Range rover.

I've also seen a few on the roads? Must these be demos?

Edited by illmonkey on Tuesday 12th August 10:33

warnster

115 posts

241 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
that is truly hideous!

DamoLLb

1,775 posts

224 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
Im not sure if the 0-60 should be the bench mark in this class! (although it is suppose to be a class of its own)offroad/luxury/nvh levels I thought to be the highest agenda....silly me

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

254 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
Just to be the lone voice of positivity - I have seen a couple on the roads and there is something about them I like. Yes, they are huge, but I love that about it.

It's almost like a sanitised Judge Dredd vehicle. smile

The engineering, speed, comfort, equipment...I for one applaud our new 4xCoupe overlords.

If it were not for the fact that things like this are becoming so socially unacceptable it's going to make their drivers targets, I would have one in a shot.

P~

bobt

1,323 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
A lot of Munich metal for your 50 grand, but still an utterly pointless car, that will no doubt be on the shopping list for those playing in the lower half of the premiership.

jackmontandon

64 posts

228 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
just why?

chiefski26

856 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
ive seen one = ugliest car ever ?

Snoggledog

9,258 posts

246 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
If I had to buy a 4x4 I'd get an Overfinch

carl_w

10,744 posts

287 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
I liked the rakish style of these when I saw the pictures. However, I was at a BMW dealer and saw one in the flesh. hurl

Turbo Sandwhich

92 posts

219 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
60mph in 5.4 seconds? thats seriously fast for a bin lorry!tank

dibbly_dobbler

11,492 posts

226 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
PhantomPH said:
Just to be the lone voice of positivity - I have seen a couple on the roads and there is something about them I like. Yes, they are huge, but I love that about it.

It's almost like a sanitised Judge Dredd vehicle. smile

The engineering, speed, comfort, equipment...I for one applaud our new 4xCoupe overlords.

If it were not for the fact that things like this are becoming so socially unacceptable it's going to make their drivers targets, I would have one in a shot.

P~
+1. There's a black one parked up round the corner from us and it's really not that bad. Dare I say that relative to the rest of the current BMW range it's about par for the course ? Dont know about the rest of you but there's very few (if any) of them are actually what I would call pretty...



[AJ]

3,079 posts

227 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
chiefski26 said:
ive seen one = ugliest car ever ?
Indeed. Makes the Cayenne actually look nice!

tobyboy

9 posts

224 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
Why are car manufacturers locked in a battle to see who can can produce the fastest truck? Leave that to Scania or MAN. Surely in this day and age manfacturers should be boasting about making cars faster and more efficient by using technology to make them lighter, not using technology to make them faster DESPITE their weight. A total technological dead end.

Gruppe1875

1,966 posts

228 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
tobyboy said:
Surely in this day and age manfacturers should be boasting about making cars faster and more efficient by using technology to make them lighter, not using technology to make them faster DESPITE their weight. A total technological dead end.
I think they have. Faster, more efficient, lower C02 ...

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

254 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
bobt said:
...but still an utterly pointless car
Ah, my fave bullst argument! biggrin

Of course, your C2 is completely and un-equivocally WITH point, is it? No speed limits in Portugal? Never need to transport a piece of furniture or make a run to the local tip with all those empty boxes after Christmas?

Oh wait - we are supposed to have one car for loading, one car for passengers, one car for going fast, one car for accessing the more remote areas abundant here in the North.

Christ - if anything, this is the car with the MOST point! It's pretty damn good at just about everything you need from a vehicle.

P~

dazsmith69

284 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
pointless

if u want to go fast by an m3
if u want to go off road buy a landrover

simple

why have such a pointless car on the road?!

Hunttheshunt

1,093 posts

269 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
PhantomPH said:
bobt said:
...but still an utterly pointless car
Ah, my fave bullst argument! biggrin

Of course, your C2 is completely and un-equivocally WITH point, is it? No speed limits in Portugal? Never need to transport a piece of furniture or make a run to the local tip with all those empty boxes after Christmas?

Oh wait - we are supposed to have one car for loading, one car for passengers, one car for going fast, one car for accessing the more remote areas abundant here in the North.

Christ - if anything, this is the car with the MOST point! It's pretty damn good at just about everything you need from a vehicle.

P~
+1

a contrario

62 posts

217 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
It will make BMW a lot of money, therefore it should never be described as 'pointless'.

Edited by a contrario on Tuesday 12th August 12:24

PhilLL

1,123 posts

229 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
PhantomPH said:
dazsmith69 said:
pointless

if u want to go fast by an m3
if u want to go off road buy a landrover

simple

why have such a pointless car on the road?!
See above, you fool.

What if you want to do both of those things on different days?
But what I don't really get with this is that the boot doesn't look very practical, it only seats 4 and rear headroom looks compromised. And with the price of luxury SUVs seemingly dropping like stones I just think buying one of these new now would be a nightmare come resale.

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

254 months

Tuesday 12th August 2008
quotequote all
PhilLL said:
But what I don't really get with this is that the boot doesn't look very practical, it only seats 4 and rear headroom looks compromised. And with the price of luxury SUVs seemingly dropping like stones I just think buying one of these new now would be a nightmare come resale.
Mate, that's the winner tho. For me, I know I would not spend full whack on one - but give it 18 months and the purchase price is going to be bloody attractive - especially given the 'swiss army' nature of it's abilities. yes, the boot lines are a slight compromise, but it's still LARGE in there. It would suit me down to the ground - for all the reasons I already mentioned.

Plus I have a tiny cock, so it's made for me! wink

P~