Handing House Keys Back to Lender...
Handing House Keys Back to Lender...
Author
Discussion

Mello

Original Poster:

6,475 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th August 2008
quotequote all
You hear about people doing this, but surely the lender then sells the house for peanuts and the person then owes real money instead of a theoretical debt? Why would you do this (apart from being unable to make any payments)? I'm sure I'm being dim... please explain, somebody who knows?

SS HSV

9,646 posts

289 months

Thursday 14th August 2008
quotequote all
Never hand keys back to lender.

This is a typical pub conversation where someone is trying to be cool by saying they 'threw the keys back' when infact it means that the loser could not control their finances and the house got repo'd yes

Shay HTFC

3,588 posts

220 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
If person A gets a mortgage on a house for £300,000, then throws the keys back and it is sold for £70k, the bank do not just roll over and accept it. They have 'loaned' a cash sum of £300,000, rather than the physical obect of the house.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

285 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
Mind you if they cant, and probably wont, get the balance back form the defaultor its the banks own fault for lending to high a % on a property plainly not worth the risk.

siscar

6,887 posts

248 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
The problem is that in America many home loans are non-recursive meaning that you can hand the keys to the lender and walk away owing nothing even if the loan is more than the value of the property. However in the UK it doesn't work that way, you are liable for the full value of the loan plus interest regardless.

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

278 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
siscar said:
The problem is that in America many home loans are non-recursive meaning that you can hand the keys to the lender and walk away owing nothing even if the loan is more than the value of the property. However in the UK it doesn't work that way, you are liable for the full value of the loan plus interest regardless.
Exactly. This is why the bad debt are being written off so quickly by the banks. They get the keys back, the person walks away. The banks lose the original money lent, plus have a house on their books that has almost zero worth because theres no one buying houses right now.

Do you really think the banks would be losing billions if this issue was just a few hundered thousand 'sub primers'? If it were happaneing in this country the banks would be getting around 75% of their money back. In the USA they get virtually nothing.

Makes the decsion to walk away much much easier if they cant tie you to a debt for the rest of your life too. Which is the real problem. US sub-primers will pay their credit card debt before their mortgage arrears.

johnnywb

1,631 posts

239 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
Lenders do have a responsibility to ensure that they get fair value for the property if they sell it though. They cannot simply sell it for £50,000 and then come after you.

They don't have to achieve open market price, but a market price given the fire-sale scenario.

It's for this reason that repo'd properties are normally auctioned, as this shows that market price has been achieved after a marketing period.

Hedders

24,460 posts

278 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
So buying property in the states is a 100% risk free investment?

No wonder they are all so rich :P

briSk

14,291 posts

257 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
Hedders said:
So buying property in the states is a 100% risk free investment?
thing is..most of the ones who bought recently had more in common with Forest or more likely Bubba than Trump..!

Hedders

24,460 posts

278 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
briSk said:
Hedders said:
So buying property in the states is a 100% risk free investment?
thing is..most of the ones who bought recently had more in common with Forest or more likely Bubba than Trump..!
Yeah, and even they didn't lose any money!

Why would anyone rent, ever?

ETA: now that i think about it, when i lived over there neither of my bosses owned their houses!



Edited by Hedders on Friday 15th August 09:02

scorp

8,783 posts

260 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
mickken said:
Most people are too fking stupid to realise that the Lender will still chase them for the money if there is still outstanding monies owing when they've sold it at a piss take price.

"You've got your house back, we're done".....errrr, no you're not you fking retard.

Edited by mickken on Thursday 14th August 23:48
It doesn't sound wise to me, why would the lender seek to make a loss and rely on an financial muppet to repay the difference?

bazking69

8,620 posts

221 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
The debt is the money lent to finance the house, not the house.

cjs

11,711 posts

282 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
I have a friend who is still being pursued by a lender 15 years or so after defaulting on his mortgage. This was during the last recession in the 90's. He thought he could just throw the keys back at the bank. The debt has held him back ever since, he was only recently able to obtain another mortgage and has rented and lived hand to mouth for years.


BTW he is a bit of a cock!

Vesuvius 996

35,829 posts

302 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
You wait, this will be the latest "whining" story on SKY News.


"Oh, I borrowed 110% and now they've reposessed me. And not only that, they sold the house at auction and now they're chasing me for another £100,000 on top. It's just not fai ror right. Greedy banks."


Why does no one EVER read what they sign?

Pricks.

liner33

10,861 posts

233 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
cjs said:
I have a friend who is still being pursued by a lender 15 years or so after defaulting on his mortgage. This was during the last recession in the 90's. He thought he could just throw the keys back at the bank. The debt has held him back ever since, he was only recently able to obtain another mortgage and has rented and lived hand to mouth for years.


BTW he is a bit of a cock!
I know someone in the same situation , he deliberatly defaulted after the breakup of his marriage , ended up owning more than the original mortgage had cost by the time all the charges added up.

Vesuvius 996

35,829 posts

302 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Morning. You're late!

Oh, is that my tea? Cheers.

hehe



lol@cornedbeefarms.com


V8mate

45,899 posts

220 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
Things have change a bit from the last housing slump.
Back then, there were no laws regarding how repossessions were to take place. Often, when the building society took possession, they would then just ask round the office to see if anyone wanted it, or ask round estate agent mates. They were sold at 'mate rates' and left the former ownr with a 'gap' debt hugely magnified from the original negative equity.

Things have changed now and the properties have to, at the very least, be put into public auctions, so the sale is a matter of public record. Some might be remarketed; it would depend on how valuable the property was but, quite rightly, the lender usually just wants to realise some liquidity ASAP.

This is all well and good until you hit a time like now, when it's the borrowing of cash that's hard. That means that there are less private buyers at auctions. You just have a lot of property traders who are looking to pay rock bottom. Prices achieved will be low.

In summary, handing keys back isn't the 'bend over' situation it was 15+ years ago, but now, in a difficult market for both property and finance, isn't a great time to do it either.

Edited by V8mate on Friday 15th August 09:24

Davi

17,153 posts

251 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
siscar said:
The problem is that in America many home loans are non-recursive meaning that you can hand the keys to the lender and walk away owing nothing even if the loan is more than the value of the property. However in the UK it doesn't work that way, you are liable for the full value of the loan plus interest regardless.
My understanding is that while that it totally correct of US mortgages, they do still have credit ratings which are used by landlords - so you may be able to throw the keys back, but you won't then be able to rent anywhere OR buy anywhere.

cjs

11,711 posts

282 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I did say he was a bit of a cock!

plasticpig

12,932 posts

256 months

Friday 15th August 2008
quotequote all
Usually if the mortgage is with a reputable bank or building society it is possible to negotiate a reasonable settlement of the debt. They have after all written off the debt on their books. This is why the banks are declaring losses as they are putting in big provisions for defaulting loans. The people who will hound people to the end of the earth are the debt consolidation finance companies.