MR2
Author
Discussion

swansea v6

Original Poster:

1,283 posts

248 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Im looking to chop in my mark 1 mx-5 and pick up an MR 2, mark 2 I think? Where is the best place to gather as much info regarding these cars? really tempted by the turbo model!!!!!!!!!!!

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

221 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Different beasts, to the 5, i've both www.imoc.co.uk or www.mr2oc.co.uk

swansea v6

Original Poster:

1,283 posts

248 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
Cheers, have a few to look and test drive this week, so fingers crossed....are there any models, or certain years (when made) to avoid?

MikeyMike

587 posts

224 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
To be honest mate if you're looking at getting a turbo its best to just take each car on its own merits rather than make a decision based on revision or model. Look at the history of the vehicle closely, too many people (generally those who have never owned an mr2) are quick to rule out the earlier revisions (1989-1993 models)I'd sooner have a low mileage well looked after Rev 1 than a higher mileage possibly dubious Rev 3 or 4. I've got a 1992 Rev 2 Turbo, I bought it 3 years ago with 54k on the clock and apart from a dodgy knock sensor it hasn't missed a beat. All modifications on the car are highly regarded and well carried out and once I pick up my fuel cut defencer from Fensport it should be good for a safe 290hp at the fly.
There are loads for sale at the mo' so hold out for a good'un.

Edited by MikeyMike on Wednesday 20th August 23:45

Wadeski

8,854 posts

236 months

Wednesday 20th August 2008
quotequote all
if you have come from an MX-5, drive a turbo...a UK model wont feel any faster than your car. although it will be more comfortable. Turbo = huge grin.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

221 months

Thursday 21st August 2008
quotequote all
MikeyMike said:
All modifications on the car are highly regarded and well carried out and once I pick up my fuel cut defencer from Fensport it should be good for a safe 290hp at the fly.
Edited by MikeyMike on Wednesday 20th August 23:45
Must be quite a lot of mods. Most rev1 & 2's when dyno'd as stock disapoint owners producing only about 210bhp. To get 290bhp you won't be on the stock turbo.

MikeyMike

587 posts

224 months

Thursday 21st August 2008
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
MikeyMike said:
All modifications on the car are highly regarded and well carried out and once I pick up my fuel cut defencer from Fensport it should be good for a safe 290hp at the fly.
Edited by MikeyMike on Wednesday 20th August 23:45
Must be quite a lot of mods. Most rev1 & 2's when dyno'd as stock disapoint owners producing only about 210bhp. To get 290bhp you won't be on the stock turbo.
Im running a stage 2 hybrid at 0.9bar at the moment but with the FCD I can up the boost to 1.2bar which according to Fensport should be good for 290. Im looking at cooling upgrades at the moment, 3S Services can fit a ST205 Charge cooler for £600 or I can go for a Berk Intercooler for £400.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

221 months

Thursday 21st August 2008
quotequote all
RadTec form Rogues £100 more than the ST205 and better, one to consider. I'd certainly not run 1.2 Bar without upgraded cooling.

I used to run an Owen Developments stage 1 hybrid at 1 Bar with Greddy side mount, combined with a poor tune from a once respected Toyota Specialist was enough to crack the pistons.

icraigmy

1,653 posts

246 months

Thursday 21st August 2008
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
if you have come from an MX-5, drive a turbo...a UK model wont feel any faster than your car. although it will be more comfortable. Turbo = huge grin.
No, my TVR Tamora 4.0L = Very very extremely huge grin

My MR2 MK2 = driving a bus, but I'd never sell my MR2, it's a reliable brillianceclap

Edited by icraigmy on Friday 22 August 01:01

White-Noise

5,500 posts

271 months

Sunday 24th August 2008
quotequote all
icraigmy said:
Wadeski said:
if you have come from an MX-5, drive a turbo...a UK model wont feel any faster than your car. although it will be more comfortable. Turbo = huge grin.
No, my TVR Tamora 4.0L = Very very extremely huge grin

My MR2 MK2 = driving a bus, but I'd never sell my MR2, it's a reliable brillianceclap

Edited by icraigmy on Friday 22 August 01:01
Well its plain as day then, buy a Tamora for a very very extremely grin, or go with the MR2 and get great value and bang for buck!

Red Devil

13,441 posts

231 months

Sunday 24th August 2008
quotequote all
White-Noise said:
go with the MR2 and get great value and bang for buck!
The turbo is an unbeatable combination imo. But then I'm biased 'cos I've got one....! wink

OlberJ

14,101 posts

256 months

Monday 25th August 2008
quotequote all
Unbeatable till it goes bang and then you see where your buck's going.

If you're getting a turbo, either pay the money for a good, well cared for one or be prepared to spend money fixing it.

Be that a new turbo, or a V6.

Red Devil

13,441 posts

231 months

Tuesday 26th August 2008
quotequote all
OlberJ said:
Unbeatable till it goes bang and then you see where your buck's going.

If you're getting a turbo, either pay the money for a good, well cared for one or be prepared to spend money fixing it.

Be that a new turbo, or a V6.
Fair point.
Buying a turbo is within many people's reach financially.
The costs of keeping it properly maintained and looked after is something else.
If you don't have the funds to do that it often ends in tears.
There are plenty around which clearly show a lack of tlc.
It's a step up from a hot hatch in more ways than one.

__G__

16,163 posts

213 months

Tuesday 2nd September 2008
quotequote all
Get the rev3 (1994 was cross over year) if you're planning on getting power.

The engine was strengthened in several areas (including steel head gasket). The turbo is also uprated and more powerful.

With a piggy back ECU, manual boost controller and hybrid turbo I was running @ 294bhp. You'd need much more equipment to do this on a pre-1994 model. It will work out cheaper trust me.


bad_roo

5,194 posts

260 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
I had a Rev2 Turbo a while back and when I took it to get chipped, they put it on the rolling road and it was making a paltry 189bhp at the fly! I got it boosted to just over 230bhp and was happy with that.

It was an otherwise excellent car. Had two aftermarket parts on it when I bought it and in all the time I had it, it developed two faults.

1). Aftermarket Kosei wheels were porous and didn't hold air
2). Aftermarket alarm/immobiliser drained the battery

Hoonfest

141 posts

235 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
I used to run a rev 3 Turbo. Great bang for buck as stated but I would say not cheap to maintain if they go wrong. Lots of parts have to be imported. Take the glass in the windows, all pretty normal I thought with a slight tint, but hey when one got smashed, the only place you could get a replacement at the time was Japan Cost about £400 I think.

I had to have the clutch done as well, not cheap again, near £1000 I think. Rear wheel bearings were a pain as well I seem to remember. Oh and don't forget the gear box issues, synchromesh in 2nd can be a problem also expensive to fix.

All in all good car until they go wrong!frownbiggrin

Wadeski

8,854 posts

236 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Hoonfest said:
I used to run a rev 3 Turbo. Great bang for buck as stated but I would say not cheap to maintain if they go wrong. Lots of parts have to be imported. Take the glass in the windows, all pretty normal I thought with a slight tint, but hey when one got smashed, the only place you could get a replacement at the time was Japan Cost about £400 I think.

I had to have the clutch done as well, not cheap again, near £1000 I think. Rear wheel bearings were a pain as well I seem to remember. Oh and don't forget the gear box issues, synchromesh in 2nd can be a problem also expensive to fix.

All in all good car until they go wrong!frownbiggrin
ummm...this is total arse.

Red Devil

13,441 posts

231 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
Hoonfest said:
I used to run a rev 3 Turbo. Great bang for buck as stated but I would say not cheap to maintain if they go wrong. Lots of parts have to be imported. Take the glass in the windows, all pretty normal I thought with a slight tint, but hey when one got smashed, the only place you could get a replacement at the time was Japan Cost about £400 I think.

I had to have the clutch done as well, not cheap again, near £1000 I think. Rear wheel bearings were a pain as well I seem to remember. Oh and don't forget the gear box issues, synchromesh in 2nd can be a problem also expensive to fix.

All in all good car until they go wrong!frownbiggrin
With those prices its sounds to me like you've been s*****d over big time by Mr T.
Imports have bronze tinted windows whereas UK cars have blue. No need to go to Japan for glass.
Plenty of imports being broken for parts due to young/inexperienced drivers stacking them into the scenery.
No way would a clutch change alone cost £1k if you took it to an MR2 specialist.
The best investment I ever made with mine was to join an owners club.
Lots of help and info on where to find stuff/who to go to/etc.


neiljohnson

11,298 posts

230 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
Ive dona a clutch and various other work on these over the years and granted they a pain in the arse to work on, but not really any harder than a n/a one. I cant see how someone could warrant £1000 to change a clutch unless the part itself was a very expensive uprated jobby??

Darkslider

3,084 posts

212 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
Hey everyone, don't wanna start a new thread so hoping it's okay if I hijack this one a little. How can I tell if the engine is a turbo or not? Looking at an MR2 on ebay at the moment and it's described as a GT. According to parkers this means its a Sports 2d at 168 bhp? I thought the turbos were closer to 200 odd brake?

Pictures of the car in question. Is this a rev 2? Help!







Will take a look at the mr2oc now, thanks.

Edited by Darkslider on Friday 12th September 18:47