Paul Gadd comng home...
Discussion
The man has served his time, and hopefully learnt his lesson - we are not in a position to judge the bloke, and anyone who would contemplate violence toward such an individual is no better than Mr Glitter himself.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Edited by sa_20v on Thursday 21st August 22:17
sa_20v said:
The man has served his time, and hopefully learnt his lesson - we are not in a position to judge the bloke, and anyone who would contemplate violence toward such an individual is no better than Mr Glitter himself.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Yeah!You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Edited by sa_20v on Thursday 21st August 22:17
Wot eva!
odyssey2200 said:
sa_20v said:
The man has served his time, and hopefully learnt his lesson - we are not in a position to judge the bloke, and anyone who would contemplate violence toward such an individual is no better than Mr Glitter himself.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Yeah!You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Edited by sa_20v on Thursday 21st August 22:17
Wot eva!
k who needs to be under constant surveillance to ensure he never commits crimes ever again anywhere. But lynch mobs? No thank you...Don said:
odyssey2200 said:
sa_20v said:
The man has served his time, and hopefully learnt his lesson - we are not in a position to judge the bloke, and anyone who would contemplate violence toward such an individual is no better than Mr Glitter himself.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Yeah!You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Edited by sa_20v on Thursday 21st August 22:17
Wot eva!
k who needs to be under constant surveillance to ensure he never commits crimes ever again anywhere. But lynch mobs? No thank you...sa_20v said:
The man has served his time, and hopefully learnt his lesson - we are not in a position to judge the bloke, and anyone who would contemplate violence toward such an individual is no better than Mr Glitter himself.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Fack off! You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Edited by sa_20v on Thursday 21st August 22:17
sa_20v said:
The man has served his time, and hopefully learnt his lesson - we are not in a position to judge the bloke, and anyone who would contemplate violence toward such an individual is no better than Mr Glitter himself.
You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Normally I'd agree with you, but in this instance there was enough evidence to find Mr Gadd guilty of having hardcore pictures of children on his computer in 1999, and then he was found guilty of abusing two girls aged 10 and 11.You lot remind me of a gang who found out where their nearest paedo resided, either smashed up them or their home (I can’t remember which), only to then realise they'd done over a paediatrician, not a paedophile.
Edited by sa_20v on Thursday 21st August 22:17
He's not some innocent bloke in the street, he's a convicted paedophile and I personally think it's a waste of oxygen that he's allowed to carry on breathing. Don't even bother trying to defend him to me because I will not see your point of view.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff