Roll call, who has flown Concorde?

Roll call, who has flown Concorde?

Author
Discussion

oyster

Original Poster:

12,630 posts

249 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
None of this cheapo first class stuff, what about the real deal?

NDA

21,662 posts

226 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all

I got upgraded on a BA first class ticket coming back from New York onto Concorde. At the time I didn't really see what all the fuss was about - but now it's gone, I do. A bit.

Nimbus

1,176 posts

229 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
oyster said:
None of this cheapo first class stuff, what about the real deal?
Yes thanks, JFK back to Heathrow 1 month before it stopped service.

Worth every penny smile

I.T.B

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
Uber rich s


biggrinbiggrinbiggrin

Don

28,377 posts

285 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
I flew from Toronto to Montreal. Then Montreal to Heathrow. The stop in Montreal was because the runway in Toronto was too short for it to take off with a full fuel load.

That's twice through take off. biggrin As the captain said "You will find the performance somewhat more sprightly than that of conventional aircraft".

The wife and I did it purely for the experience - I wanted to fly in Concorde before it was decomissioned. Had a great five day break in Toronto first, too, even if I did have to sit through "The Phantom Of The Opera" (the Mrs wanted to see it).

Sciroccology

29,908 posts

231 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
Do you mean "flown" or "flown in" Concorde?




Either way, it's a no from me.

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

249 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
Yes thanks.

To be honest a Gulfstream (G5) feels more impressive on takeoff, possibly because it is smaller though not supersonic.

stuart-b

3,643 posts

227 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
I didn't get a chance, but both my grand parents have.

Maybe they'll commission another plane like it one day ...

walm

10,609 posts

203 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
stuart-b said:
I didn't get a chance, but both my grand parents have.

Maybe they'll commission another plane like it one day ...
Not me. Nor any of my grand parents. But then they aren't in a league where commissioning the next concorde is something they might do...

Maxf

8,409 posts

242 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
One of my biggest regrets is not taking a ticket when I had the chance - it was just some comedy flight to Scotland (not even landing IIRC) but was one of the last flights and wasn't crazy money. I was at uni though and cash was used on other stuff frown

Fidgits

17,202 posts

230 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
i was so gutted i didn't get a chance... i was saving my BA miles to use it, and just couldnt get the last of the reasonably priced flights before it was retired! frown

stuart-b

3,643 posts

227 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
Reading Wikipedia...

wikipedia said:
Due to jet engines being highly inefficient at low speeds, Concorde burned two tonnes of fuel taxiing to the runway.[17] To conserve fuel only the two outer engines were run after landing. The thrust from two engines was sufficient for taxiing to the ramp due to low aircraft weight upon landing at its destination. A Concorde once ran out of fuel taxiing to the terminal after a flight; the pilot was dismissed.
wikipedia said:
Due to a relatively high average takeoff speed of 250 mph (400 km/h), Concorde needed good brakes. Concorde used an anti-lock braking system, which stop the wheels from locking when fully applied, allowing greater deceleration and control during braking, particularly in wet conditions. The brakes were carbon-based and could bring Concorde, weighing up to 185 tons (188 tonnes) and travelling at 190 mph (305 km/h), to a stop from an aborted takeoff within one mile (1600 m). This braking manoeuvre brought the brakes to temperatures of 300 °C to 500 °C, requiring several hours for cooling.
Wow, serious brakes back in the 60's and 70's then!

Hollow Legs

177 posts

199 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
Yep..... was fantastic. gutted when it was grounded.such an awsome experience.

managed to get it when I did a year in industry placement @ BA.

flew LHR - JFK on concorde and then stayed in a hostel.


jamesgrrr

3,764 posts

222 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
I have biggrin

But I don't remember it as I was 2 at the time frown

Dirty Boy

14,712 posts

210 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
that's quite remarkable

How many tonnes of fuel did they actually carry in total?

2 tonnes just to taxi!

Eric Mc

122,113 posts

266 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
Carbon brakes (as well as basic steel disc brakes) were designed originally for use on aircraft.

Much early work on carbon fibre and other composite materials was carried out by the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough in the 1950s and 1960s.

schmalex

13,616 posts

207 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
My wife flew on an Air France Concorde from CDG to JFK. Which was nice.

Mekon

2,492 posts

217 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
I wish I had. My old man did from Bahrain, and I have some souveniers somewhere. I just finished Brian Trubshaw's (chief test pilot) book on it, and went to Duxford last weekend to see 101. Fantastic piece of kit. Incredible achievement.

Edited by Mekon on Thursday 28th August 11:08

NDA

21,662 posts

226 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all

There's a Concorde at Brooklands of course.....

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

243 months

Thursday 28th August 2008
quotequote all
NDA said:
There's a Concorde at Brooklands of course.....
yes

Been on that one.