How do I make my bike more willing to turn?
How do I make my bike more willing to turn?
Author
Discussion

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

236 months

Sunday 31st August 2008
quotequote all
Not sure if there's a technical term for it, but my bike (2005 Specialised FSR XC Pro with Rock Shox Reba forks) seems reluctant to turn, especially at slowish speeds.

I've read reviews of new bikes where comment is made as to the willingness or otherwise for a bike to turn, and the woes of having too much or not enough, but what actually influences this? Is there anything I can do to alter it? Changing stem length or something like that?

pastrana72

1,740 posts

231 months

Sunday 31st August 2008
quotequote all
A shorter length stem than your exsisting one will liven up the turning response.

I always run 70mm or 75mm stem lenght on my bikes, which are stretched out in the frame any way.

LRdriver II

1,936 posts

272 months

Sunday 31st August 2008
quotequote all
Stem length plays a role definately, but watch out you dont compromise your position too much..especially if you have a short top tube in the first place.
Also make sure your headset isnt too too tight (binding) or make sure the bearings are in good nick.

Otherwise its the headtube geometry that dictates how responsive the bike is, and these days thats coupled with making sure the proper suspension fork length is used (fitting 140mm travel fork to an old skool frame that previously rode with a ridgid fork is an extreme example)

LRdriver II

1,936 posts

272 months

Sunday 31st August 2008
quotequote all
Just to add.. the spesh frame and reba fork is a fairly new and sorted combo.. so I woulld look at headset binding. Lift the front wheel off the floor by holding the top tube and the bars should swing freely and smoothly from lock to lock. any stiction is bad.

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

236 months

Sunday 31st August 2008
quotequote all
Thanks for the input guys.

The headset is fine - I replaced the original when it died with a nice Hope one which is smooth as anything.

From what has been said, I'd guess it comes from changing the forks. I can't off-hand remember what was on their originally, but they were clearly the area where Spesh had pushed back to come within budget! They had a maximum travel in theory of 100mm, but with my 18 stone frame, I was taking up 70% of the travel at a standstill, and the heaviest springs the LBS could find for them were only rated up to somewhere short of 14 stone!

In theory, the Rebas only take the travel from 100mm to 115mm, but as I can pump them up to only take up 30% travel at standstill, I guess this makes for a big difference. I thing the stem on there is already pretty short, so I'm not sure how much more option I have. I'll dial the forks down to 80mm and see if there is a noticeable difference.

Chris71

21,548 posts

265 months

Monday 1st September 2008
quotequote all
What tubes and tyres are you running?

The rotating mass does seem to have an effect on the bike's willingness to turn in. Doubt it's as significant as head angle, but I reckon you can noitce it. Especially if it's something like DH tyres and tyre protectors against an XC setup.

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

236 months

Monday 1st September 2008
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
What tubes and tyres are you running?

The rotating mass does seem to have an effect on the bike's willingness to turn in. Doubt it's as significant as head angle, but I reckon you can noitce it. Especially if it's something like DH tyres and tyre protectors against an XC setup.
Just 2.1" Panaracer XC tyres and bog standard Spesh tubes. If anything, the tyres are lighter than those I had on previously.

mk1fan

10,839 posts

248 months

Monday 1st September 2008
quotequote all
It sounds more like a balance and rider issue than a bike issue. The bike should be spot on handling wise.

If it is tight flat switchbacks you're having trouble with it might be worth reading up on how to 'do' them and checking you're doing it. I tend to stall in them and I know it's me not the bike.

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

236 months

Monday 1st September 2008
quotequote all
Could well be. Are there any decent online resources people can point me at?

mk1fan

10,839 posts

248 months

Monday 1st September 2008
quotequote all
Bike Radar might be worth a trawling - as they're the on-line version of MBUK and WMB. Most of the 'big' mags have a skills section each month so some back issues might be worth ordering.

However, 'Fundamentals' DVD is very good and contains advice on nearly all types of Trail riding. 'Fluid - Ride like a Pro' is a more indepth instructional DVD that's worth a gander too.

vwsurfbum

896 posts

234 months

Monday 1st September 2008
quotequote all
in my experiance i would say its your fork set up, try different settings on a short trail you know until you find the set up you like?
i had this problem last year and it took me ages to figure out i had the forks far to hard as they felt fine standing still bouncing them. Just a suggestion.

aciddrop616

1,981 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd September 2008
quotequote all
whilst turning, lean ....... alot, just dont fall off

mat205125

17,790 posts

236 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
I've got nearly the same bike, and would suggest looking at your settings first.

Do you have enough shims on your head tube to move the stem up on the forks?

Shorter stem would do the trick, however are your bars angled forwards to allow some adjustment by turning them back.

Tried dropping your saddle?

Tried increasing the air pressure in your fork to make the front slightly stiffer?

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

221 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
Thanks for the input guys.

The headset is fine - I replaced the original when it died with a nice Hope one which is smooth as anything.

From what has been said, I'd guess it comes from changing the forks. I can't off-hand remember what was on their originally, but they were clearly the area where Spesh had pushed back to come within budget! They had a maximum travel in theory of 100mm, but with my 18 stone frame, I was taking up 70% of the travel at a standstill, and the heaviest springs the LBS could find for them were only rated up to somewhere short of 14 stone!

In theory, the Rebas only take the travel from 100mm to 115mm, but as I can pump them up to only take up 30% travel at standstill, I guess this makes for a big difference. I thing the stem on there is already pretty short, so I'm not sure how much more option I have. I'll dial the forks down to 80mm and see if there is a noticeable difference.
Basically, if you increase the fork length you slacken the steering geometry which makes the steering less twitchy, but in extreme cases makes the bike "flop" into corners. I have Tripple Clamp DH forks on my MTB tandem which are really too long, but I just live with it due to the advantages it has. This makes the bike handle as described. Basically the only thing you can do is either fit lower profile tyres or reduce the travel of the fork by running more sag (or you might be able to get them spaced by someone like TFT).

ETA having re-read your post, you can adjust the travel anyway. Do this and you will notice a difference.

HTH.

Edited by rhinochopig on Wednesday 3rd September 13:27

Mr_C

2,495 posts

252 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
I like my bikes the opposite, so I run short travel forks on frames designed for longer ones.

The steeper head angle makes them handle perfect (to me, being more of a trials rider), but they're a bit twitchier, which isn't a problem to me.

neil_bolton

17,113 posts

287 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
Longer fork = harder to turn, floppier feel

I've recently changed from a set of single crown to triple clamp forks, and noticed how its changed the reaction to turning.

However, luckily, the Commencal Mini-DH and DH frames come with a VERY handy head angle converter - you turn the shim, and you get either -10 degree or + 10 degree head angle. You also get a 0 degree head angle shim, which I'll be trying soon as I am finding the bike a little TOO slow and stable:

At speed you really want something that will react quickly, however this can only really be utilised if you are absolutely confident in your ability to handle the quicker handling!

mk1fan

10,839 posts

248 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
neil_bolton said:
-10 degree or + 10 degree head angle.
eek Holy Moly - that's a big difference in head angle.

neil_bolton

17,113 posts

287 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
mk1fan said:
neil_bolton said:
-10 degree or + 10 degree head angle.
eek Holy Moly - that's a big difference in head angle.
Oops.

I may have actually meant +/- 1 degree redface

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

236 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
Dialled it down to 80mm this evening and compared it on the road to 115mm, locked out in both. Huge difference!