autocar review of new 330d
autocar review of new 330d
Author
Discussion

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
im reading this thinking yes ,yes, yes, then comes the kicker at the end "although the 3 series now runs 4th generation run flat tyres it still cant match the c class for overall ride comfort around town its a little ragged." Bcensoreds

why do they insist on these tyres?i love my 120d auto EFF.DYN. apart from the ride .Ive got a box on it and from a power to MPG ratio cant think what might better it. Cant imagine what the first generation runflats were like but to me i imagine its like being able to get into and drive a tonka toy.Really puts me off .

Bosh 964

70 posts

233 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
Get a set of Falken 452s and some Holts Tyreweld

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
fair enough but why should i have to go to all that trouble and expense after purchasing a "premium brand"ridiculous.

NickB12

9,708 posts

281 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
I was in a C320 the other day with 'Sports' suspension and it was like my E46 SE.

Some people, not me, like the rft's, and on a motorway, for example they're ok. If your 120 has Pirelli Euforias, changing them to continental Sportcontact2s transforms the ride and handling (with a little more psi) for under £500. Imho the Prielis combined with the 120 setup was bordering on unsafe. From what I've read though, other rft's are better.

Why they're not an option when buying new I don't know. Everything else is rolleyes

barney123

495 posts

241 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
"4th Generation" run flat tyres.

Does that mean they are even harder to find and more expensive than the previous ones ?

They can keep them.

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
very frustrating, from what you read BMWs are still just about better than mercs in every dept apart from the ride.Im not prepared to put up with driving an expensive car that is vaguely similar to what you might ride in a warehouse.A real shame.

dxb335d

2,905 posts

225 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
carlovers said:
very frustrating, from what you read BMWs are still just about better than mercs in every dept apart from the ride.Im not prepared to put up with driving an expensive car that is vaguely similar to what you might ride in a warehouse.A real shame.
The ride is great once runflats are ditched.

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
thats it though dx why should you have to, surely theyve done market research ,wonder why they went this route, i would love to trade up to a 3 series but when i make my move i reckon it will be a c320cdi with a brabus chip,that is a shame .

Edited by carlovers on Wednesday 3rd September 19:59

skeeterm5

4,587 posts

218 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
a couple of years ago the wife went to buy a cooper s - came as standard with run flats and the already hard ride was, frankly, daft with the rft.

told the dealer that unless he fitted proper tyres we wouldnt buy, after much nashing and wailing and us getting up to walk ago they agreed. so picked car up with normal tyres - best thing for it.

S

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
the new 3 series 30d sounds as good as a diesel gets, 49.6 mpg combined amazing,b......y runflats

JNW1

9,478 posts

224 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
carlovers said:
thats it though dx why should you have to, surely theyve done market research ,wonder why they went this route, i would love to trade up to a 3 series but when i make my move i reckon it will be a c320cdi with a brabus chip,that is a shame .

Edited by carlovers on Wednesday 3rd September 19:59
Understand the issue and frustration with run flats on the BMW but on the subject of the Merc I had a run in a friend's new C320 Cdi Sport recently and, while a very nice car overall, I couldn't believe the amount of road noise from the tyres (and this on the standard 17" wheels). To put it in context I reckon if anything my E46 M3CS generates less road noise and probably rides almost as smoothly as well!

Not sure if you've tried a C320 CDi but all I'm trying to say is that it could prove just as wearing on a long run as a BMW on run flats albeit for a different reason. Mind, I suppose you can drown out road noise with the stereo whereas you can't get away from a fidgety ride quite so easily!

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2008
quotequote all
thats interesting because i did drive one but only round london very comfortable,in fairness my car is very quiet on the m/way

Edited by carlovers on Wednesday 3rd September 23:19

bennno

15,253 posts

299 months

Thursday 4th September 2008
quotequote all
carlovers said:
fair enough but why should i have to go to all that trouble and expense after purchasing a "premium brand"ridiculous.
You wont be expecting this but in say 15k miles the rubber bits that touch the ground wear out and you generally buy a new set.

bennno

JNW1

9,478 posts

224 months

Thursday 4th September 2008
quotequote all
bennno said:
carlovers said:
fair enough but why should i have to go to all that trouble and expense after purchasing a "premium brand"ridiculous.
You wont be expecting this but in say 15k miles the rubber bits that touch the ground wear out and you generally buy a new set.

bennno
Ok but why should you have endure indifferent ride quality for 15k miles when you've just paid a lot of money for what is meant to be a premium car? I realise that buying a new set of tyres from day one would probably cost "only" around £600 (or the equivalent of one or two optional extras) but having just paid in the order of £30k for a brand new car should you really have to carry out after-market modifications to get it to ride properly?!

bennno

15,253 posts

299 months

Thursday 4th September 2008
quotequote all
JNW1 said:
bennno said:
carlovers said:
fair enough but why should i have to go to all that trouble and expense after purchasing a "premium brand"ridiculous.
You wont be expecting this but in say 15k miles the rubber bits that touch the ground wear out and you generally buy a new set.

bennno
Ok but why should you have endure indifferent ride quality for 15k miles when you've just paid a lot of money for what is meant to be a premium car? I realise that buying a new set of tyres from day one would probably cost "only" around £600 (or the equivalent of one or two optional extras) but having just paid in the order of £30k for a brand new car should you really have to carry out after-market modifications to get it to ride properly?!
Dont people do test drives? If you dont like the ride then why buy a car with big alloys, sports suspension, thick anti roll bars and run flat tyres? A used XJ would be more cosseting or a Mondeo on the smallest wheels possible.

Bennno

JNW1

9,478 posts

224 months

Thursday 4th September 2008
quotequote all
bennno said:
JNW1 said:
bennno said:
carlovers said:
fair enough but why should i have to go to all that trouble and expense after purchasing a "premium brand"ridiculous.
You wont be expecting this but in say 15k miles the rubber bits that touch the ground wear out and you generally buy a new set.

bennno
Ok but why should you have endure indifferent ride quality for 15k miles when you've just paid a lot of money for what is meant to be a premium car? I realise that buying a new set of tyres from day one would probably cost "only" around £600 (or the equivalent of one or two optional extras) but having just paid in the order of £30k for a brand new car should you really have to carry out after-market modifications to get it to ride properly?!
Dont people do test drives? If you dont like the ride then why buy a car with big alloys, sports suspension, thick anti roll bars and run flat tyres? A used XJ would be more cosseting or a Mondeo on the smallest wheels possible.

Bennno
Don't disagree with your comments about the XJ (or the Mondeo!) but if I interpret the OP correctly I think it was more an expression of frustration that BMW continue to compromise an otherwise excellent package by fitting run flats. The 330d featured in Autocar (which prompted the OP) doesn't look like a sport model and is running the standard 17" alloys; that being the case a very firm and/or fidgety ride shouldn't really be part of the package but apparently it is and the run flats seem to be the cause. Therefore, if the ride issues could indeed be resolved by fitting normal (and cheaper!) tyres it's just a shame BMW don't at least offer customers the choice!

carlovers

Original Poster:

424 posts

223 months

Thursday 4th September 2008
quotequote all
JN thanks for that,appreciated. I was going to let this thread die because i cant be bothered replying to sarcastic posts.

You have encapsulated my OP exactly. A great car is going to be compromised.I am curious as to why they must know the feedback on forums is not good yet they persevere.I do a shed load of miles and realise i would prefer a less harsh ride.

When i test drove it i didnt really notice but overtime i find it gets on my nerves just too bumpy.Thanks againbeer

0836whimper

983 posts

228 months

Sunday 7th September 2008
quotequote all
Loving the rev range on that engine, incredible performance for the MPG.

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

271 months

Monday 8th September 2008
quotequote all
Remove runflats, sell on Ebay (clearly lots of people after them if they get a flat etc), buy some non-run flats?

Can't be that bad? £300 down tops maybe? Maybe half to one months depreciation to totally transform/improve a car...?

Dave

jamoor

14,506 posts

245 months

Monday 8th September 2008
quotequote all
If I got a car with runflats - they would be off straight away.