Has there ever been a draw ie dead heat in uk drag racing??
Has there ever been a draw ie dead heat in uk drag racing??
Author
Discussion

liner33

Original Poster:

10,861 posts

223 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
Took my 8 yr old son to the pod today and he asked me the question , what happens when there is a tie ???

Pretty much stumped me i dont ever recall there being a draw the odds of both racers getting the same reaction et and speed is pretty unlikely but has it ever happened and what happens afterwards???

Dilligaf10

2,431 posts

231 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
Timing is done to 6 decimal places IIRC. on ET and reaction time so the odds are astronomical against it ever happening.

In the really unlikely event of ET and speed being exactly the same it would then go down to reaction time. If this was the same I would anticipate a re-run as I think I would safely assume a glitch in the timing system.

Edited to add that I cannot ever remember an occurrence in the last 30 years.

Edited by Dilligaf10 on Sunday 28th September 18:39

liner33

Original Poster:

10,861 posts

223 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
Having seen dozen of guys run 9.900 in the US i'm sure the odds are lower of it happening in some classes rather than others but is there an official proceedure ??

v8 jago

982 posts

274 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
Im sure the skinner lads with the fiat 126s ran identical times about 2 years ago at shakey. Everyone clapped and cheered for them. I think it was just a rwyb event though. Was still very impressive.

Jon C

3,214 posts

268 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
The winner of a Drag Race (assuming no earlier violations or infactions) has nothing to do with times or speeds, rather the first vehicle to cross the finish line. Identical times to the 20 millionth decimal place would not therefore result in a dead heat or tie.

Funnily enough, a Pal and I were discussing this today. We had a recollection of a race a few years ago (we thought Jon Morton may have been involved) in which the margin of victory (MOV) at the top end was less than 3mm. Since this is less than the permitted tolerance in the track length between the two lanes, this could theoretically have been an uncertain result. But there was still a measurable difference between the cars, and so a victor could be determined. There was a well documented Pro Stock race in Scandinavia a couple of years ago where the MOV was similar, and a brief search of the US sites suggested it could have been the closest 'Pro' race anywhere. The equipment could still separate them though...

crikey

1,705 posts

232 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
I've been put geeked by Mr Crawford again nerd

For those that cannot be arsed to go to Eurodragster and read the European Bests info that is on there readit :

The closest race in FIA competition was between Niclas Andersson and Marc Melhuizen in Pro Mod at the 2006 Main Event(round 2), a margin of victory for Niclas of 0.000016 seconds or approximately 1.539mm.

Considering the tollerances and variables, this margin of victory could not be as accurate as it appears, all that can be said is that Niclas got to the finish line first and it was bloody close !

I can't remember the Jon Morton race,though I do recall there being some very close races in the Super classes back when I had time to trawl through the data for such things.

Jon C

3,214 posts

268 months

Sunday 28th September 2008
quotequote all
crikey said:
I've been out geeked by Mr Crawford again nerd
Praise indeed, lol. I was going to come and say Hi today Andy, but with the final points calculations, new commentator bedding in, and knowing how busy it gets up there, I didn't want to get in the way.

crikey said:
For those that cannot be arsed to go to Eurodragster and read the European Bests info that is on there readit :

The closest race in FIA competition was between Niclas Andersson and Marc Melhuizen in Pro Mod at the 2006 Main Event(round 2), a margin of victory for Niclas of 0.000016 seconds or approximately 1.539mm.
Thats the one I was thinking of!

crikey said:
Considering the tollerances and variables, this margin of victory could not be as accurate as it appears, all that can be said is that Niclas got to the finish line first and it was bloody close !
Good point, well put!

liner33

Original Poster:

10,861 posts

223 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Jon C said:
The winner of a Drag Race (assuming no earlier violations or infactions) has nothing to do with times or speeds, rather the first vehicle to cross the finish line. Identical times to the 20 millionth decimal place would not therefore result in a dead heat or tie.
If the reaction times were identical it would be a tie wouldnt it as logically both vehicles would have the cross the line together ???

veryoldfart

1,739 posts

226 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
would a double red light count as a dead heat?...

crikey

1,705 posts

232 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
liner33 said:
If the reaction times were identical it would be a tie wouldnt it as logically both vehicles would have the cross the line together ???
Doesn't matter. As Jon pointed out, the system will always be able to tell who crossed the line first.

veryoldfart said:
would a double red light count as a dead heat?...
No, one of them will have red lit first.

liner33

Original Poster:

10,861 posts

223 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
crikey said:
liner33 said:
If the reaction times were identical it would be a tie wouldnt it as logically both vehicles would have the cross the line together ???
Doesn't matter. As Jon pointed out, the system will always be able to tell who crossed the line first.

veryoldfart said:
would a double red light count as a dead heat?...
No, one of them will have red lit first.
If both racers had the same reactions and both lit the lamps together it would indeed be a tie imho , i guess that would have to be a re-run

I must be missing something here , if the system (which isnt 100% accurate) is always able to show a winner yet its is theorectically (spl?) possible for two racers to get identical reactions , and et and therefore cross the line in unison (wheelbase etc shouldnt matter), so however unlikely it is possible, with all the 100's of races every weekend all over the world it must have happened especially since the use of delay boxes

If two cars crossed the line together at the same instant but one had a quicker et due to SLOWER reaction how would that play out or does that not matter ie cross the line together and do a re-run

Eurodragster.com

657 posts

228 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
liner33 said:
with all the 100's of races every weekend all over the world it must have happened especially since the use of delay boxes
I think it's far more likely that it has never happened than that it has. We are after all talking about 0.000001 seconds, these days at least, and maybe the timer goes to further decimal places internally, I don't know.

I've only been following the sport for thirty two years but I have never read or heard about a dead heat. Very occasionally I've seen the timing console at the Pod and Mantorp come up with a 0.000 margin of victory but you don't have to go many decimal places further before you find a number other than zero.

It is an interesting thought, though, what a timing system would do if it happened. Maybe we wouldn't need the LHC after all?

crikey

1,705 posts

232 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
liner33 said:
crikey said:
liner33 said:
If the reaction times were identical it would be a tie wouldnt it as logically both vehicles would have the cross the line together ???
Doesn't matter. As Jon pointed out, the system will always be able to tell who crossed the line first.

veryoldfart said:
would a double red light count as a dead heat?...
No, one of them will have red lit first.
If both racers had the same reactions and both lit the lamps together it would indeed be a tie imho , i guess that would have to be a re-run

I must be missing something here , if the system (which isnt 100% accurate) is always able to show a winner yet its is theorectically (spl?) possible for two racers to get identical reactions , and et and therefore cross the line in unison (wheelbase etc shouldnt matter), so however unlikely it is possible, with all the 100's of races every weekend all over the world it must have happened especially since the use of delay boxes

If two cars crossed the line together at the same instant but one had a quicker et due to SLOWER reaction how would that play out or does that not matter ie cross the line together and do a re-run
RT's have nothing to do with it, it's the finish line that matters.

I have literaly tens of thousands of runs on record from SPR and Mantorp and the Andersson/Melhuzen is the closest of them.

The system is about as accurate as can be, but as I've said is subject to tollerances and there are countless other variables. A dead heat, imho (which I believe out ranks yours wink) will never happen. IF it did then yes, there would almost certainly be a re run.

liner33

Original Poster:

10,861 posts

223 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Eurodragster.com said:
liner33 said:
with all the 100's of races every weekend all over the world it must have happened especially since the use of delay boxes
I think it's far more likely that it has never happened than that it has. We are after all talking about 0.000001 seconds, these days at least, and maybe the timer goes to further decimal places internally, I don't know.

I've only been following the sport for thirty two years but I have never read or heard about a dead heat. Very occasionally I've seen the timing console at the Pod and Mantorp come up with a 0.000 margin of victory but you don't have to go many decimal places further before you find a number other than zero.

It is an interesting thought, though, what a timing system would do if it happened. Maybe we wouldn't need the LHC after all?
I'm still not convinced its never happened especially years ago when we didnt go to so many decimal points

Is there a appeal process in the event of a very close race???

Eurodragster.com

657 posts

228 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
liner33 said:
Is there a appeal process in the event of a very close race???
On what grounds?

crikey

1,705 posts

232 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Eurodragster.com said:
liner33 said:
Is there a appeal process in the event of a very close race???
On what grounds?
On the grounds that someone on the internet thinks it happened years ago apparently.

NitroWars

667 posts

232 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Something else to take into the equation is the distance between the part of the vehicle which breaks the finish line beam to the rear of the front wheel (where the start line beam remakes) between each vehicle... (as if there wasn't enough variables already).

Edited to correct a typo...

Edited by NitroWars on Tuesday 30th September 13:04

TheMighty

584 posts

232 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Which of course is totally eliminated by the rules Jim, hence the need to maximise the front overhang within the limits set by the rules of the individual classes. The winner can only be measured at the exact height of the 1320ft beam and its only this point on the vehicle that can possibly count toward the win or loss. If a driver chooses to have a shorter overhang and thus mean that they have to travel further to trip the beams down track, that is their perogative and should not be and isn't factored in in any way.


crikey

1,705 posts

232 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
TheMighty said:
If a driver chooses to have a shorter overhang and thus mean that they have to travel further to trip the beams down track, that is their perogative and should not be and isn't factored in in any way.
Absolutely correct, but it does lead to some daft looking add-ons to the front of some cars when teams have figured this out biggrin

Chris Isaacs

25 posts

211 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Just out of interest, the timing system does indeed display winning margins to 6 decimal places, and at 150 mph the distance travelled in 0.000001 secs is: 0.067 mm. Or 2.64 thousandths of an inch.

Obviously those distances increase as the speeds increase (and vice versa) but as several others have stated, I too have never heard of a 'dead heat' declared by the timing equipment - though the law of averages suggests it must happen one day...