First Private Orbital Space Launch
First Private Orbital Space Launch
Author
Discussion

Blib

Original Poster:

48,171 posts

227 months

Wednesday 1st October 2008
quotequote all
Does anyone have any further details of this?

Blurb said:
At 4:15 pm PDT, SpaceX's Falcon 1 rocket lifted-off and achieved Earth orbit becoming the first privately develop space launch vehicle in space
Apparently, it launched two days ago.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6f5_1222725338

The sound on the tape is a bit ropey but the on-board camera shots are magnificent. smile

Bounty Hunter

746 posts

271 months

Wednesday 1st October 2008
quotequote all
Wow

I know they lost scottys ashes - http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/04/spacexs-rocket-...

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

285 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
I'm sure they had a big budget, but you'd think they would have spent a bit of cash on decent cameras, and footage.

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Why should they spend a lot of money on publicity? They have had three previous failures so I would think that their main concern was to concentrate on making the rocket work properly.
Having said that, fairly good on-board video footage of the earlier launches is viewable on YouTube.

The person behind this is Elon Musk who became a millionaire through the setting up of PayPal.
This is the first successful launch of a privately funded LIQUID FUELED rocket - there have been other launches in the past using solid rocket motors or a mixture of liquids and solids.

Falcon have ambitions to be able to offer an alternative to government funded rockets such as Delta, Atlas and Ariane and even have ambitions to be able to launch humans. They have quite a way to go before they get to this point but if Musk's money holds out and they make profits in launching commercial payloads, they may very well succeed.

AlfaFoxtrot

407 posts

228 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
NASA are very interested in ventures like this, as they want a way of getting equipment (and possibly people) up to the ISS after the shuttle has retired, and they want it as cheap as possible cos the shuttle replacement is going to cost a vast amount.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

285 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Why should they spend a lot of money on publicity? They have had three previous failures so I would think that their main concern was to concentrate on making the rocket work properly.
Having said that, fairly good on-board video footage of the earlier launches is viewable on YouTube.

The person behind this is Elon Musk who became a millionaire through the setting up of PayPal.
This is the first successful launch of a privately funded LIQUID FUELED rocket - there have been other launches in the past using solid rocket motors or a mixture of liquids and solids.

Falcon have ambitions to be able to offer an alternative to government funded rockets such as Delta, Atlas and Ariane and even have ambitions to be able to launch humans. They have quite a way to go before they get to this point but if Musk's money holds out and they make profits in launching commercial payloads, they may very well succeed.
PR, investment, etc.

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Publicity can be a two edged sword. Publicity is fine until things go wrong. There is an old adage that all publicity is good, even bad publicity. In space and aviation however, failure is only bad for business and will drive away potential customers.

Therefore, it is best to ensure that your system works properly before touting for business. They have had three failures out of three launches prior to this successful flight and have lost three customer paying payloads - including the ashes of James Doohan - which was the main item the media picked up on.

I think what they are doing is great and I hope to see more and more privately funded space ventures over the next few decaddes. I am sure commercial launchers will create an upsurge in space business but they need to get through the test and development phase first.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

285 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
And yet the footage they have of their successful launch sucks. It might be nice to put publicity on the backburner in the name of science, but they need all the publicity they can get. Footage helps...

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
but they need all the publicity they can get. Footage helps...
Only if the launch is successful.

Those who would be really interested in using their services would make their decisions on far more important issues rather than the "niceness" of the photos they supply.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

285 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Blue Meanie said:
but they need all the publicity they can get. Footage helps...
Only if the launch is successful.

Those who would be really interested in using their services would make their decisions on far more important issues rather than the "niceness" of the photos they supply.
Oooh... Just a comment Eric. No need to get condescending. Just commenting that it looks like a webcam they use, and not a video camera.

qube_TA

8,405 posts

275 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Awesome stuff.

A great achievement.



bob1179

14,139 posts

239 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
That is a brilliant video. It will hopefully mean that space launches will get cheaper and cheaper.

smile

Blib

Original Poster:

48,171 posts

227 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
And yet the footage they have of their successful launch sucks.
I quite liked the footage.

frown

Thanks for the info on this project though!

thumbup

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 2nd October 2008
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
Eric Mc said:
Blue Meanie said:
but they need all the publicity they can get. Footage helps...
Only if the launch is successful.

Those who would be really interested in using their services would make their decisions on far more important issues rather than the "niceness" of the photos they supply.
Oooh... Just a comment Eric. No need to get condescending. Just commenting that it looks like a webcam they use, and not a video camera.
I certainly wasn't trying to be condascending - just trying to see the project from the point of view of those who are actually running it.