E90 M5?
Author
Discussion

sniff diesel

Original Poster:

13,127 posts

241 months

Tuesday 7th October 2008
quotequote all
That what this muppet thinks:

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/708780.htm

Fox-

13,575 posts

275 months

Tuesday 7th October 2008
quotequote all
Just been on the suppliers website...

'The total cost of this conversion including parts, labour, bodywork and fitment are £8500 '

£8500!? To make a 5 Series Sport look like an M5? Thats ridiculous given they already look pretty similar..

matt uk

18,084 posts

229 months

Tuesday 7th October 2008
quotequote all
I just don't get this sort of thing at all!!

So his mate jumps in for a lift:

"M5, very nice car. Quick blip of the throttle then, not often you hear a 5.0 V10!"
"ummm, nah"
"Oh. Well there's a nice straight after this turn. Give it a prod!"
"ahhh, rather not actually"
"Oh. Ummmm, it sounds a bit like the diesel version"
<no reply>
"Is it a diesel?"
"Yup"
"Not the M5 then"
"No"
"Oh, OK"
"Good MPG though"
<awkward silence>

plg101

4,106 posts

239 months

Tuesday 7th October 2008
quotequote all
And how many miles..? A £17,600 car, with apparently £13k of extra work done, and he:

  • Can't be bothered to quote the mileage (120k+ are we guessing?)
  • Un-named "good tyres"
  • I-drive computer - sorry - I thought all of these had i-drive - and it won't be a fully functional M5 computer (eg on the fly BHP mapping)
  • "There is probably a lot more I just cant remember". Great.
Super.

That said, it is a pretty good copy. Better than that 350z pimping on the other forum... ;-)

Vee

3,109 posts

263 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
plg101 said:
And how many miles..? A £17,600 car, with apparently £13k of extra work done, and he:

  • Can't be bothered to quote the mileage (120k+ are we guessing?)
  • Un-named "good tyres"
  • I-drive computer - sorry - I thought all of these had i-drive - and it won't be a fully functional M5 computer (eg on the fly BHP mapping)
  • "There is probably a lot more I just cant remember". Great.
Super.

That said, it is a pretty good copy. Better than that 350z pimping on the other forum... ;-)
Fcked ecu too ?


Edited by Vee on Wednesday 8th October 06:19

plg101

4,106 posts

239 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
Vee said:
plg101 said:
And how many miles..? A £17,600 car, with apparently £13k of extra work done, and he:

  • Can't be bothered to quote the mileage (120k+ are we guessing?)
  • Un-named "good tyres"
  • I-drive computer - sorry - I thought all of these had i-drive - and it won't be a fully functional M5 computer (eg on the fly BHP mapping)
  • "There is probably a lot more I just cant remember". Great.
Super.

That said, it is a pretty good copy. Better than that 350z pimping on the other forum... ;-)
Fcked ecu too ?

Because of the remap? "I also paid £600 for a remap by Celtic Tuning on the car mainly for economy. (Bhp 280 with 400 flb of torque.) You get on average 36 to 41 mpg"

BMW would probably say - "too many mods / ECU software no longer standard (presumably the electrics have been modded as well)- you are on your own mate - by the way your M5 sounds a bit rough, sounds more like someone put a diesel in it"


sniff diesel

Original Poster:

13,127 posts

241 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
plg101 said:
Vee said:
plg101 said:
And how many miles..? A £17,600 car, with apparently £13k of extra work done, and he:

  • Can't be bothered to quote the mileage (120k+ are we guessing?)
  • Un-named "good tyres"
  • I-drive computer - sorry - I thought all of these had i-drive - and it won't be a fully functional M5 computer (eg on the fly BHP mapping)
  • "There is probably a lot more I just cant remember". Great.
Super.

That said, it is a pretty good copy. Better than that 350z pimping on the other forum... ;-)
Fcked ecu too ?
Because of the remap? "I also paid £600 for a remap by Celtic Tuning on the car mainly for economy. (Bhp 280 with 400 flb of torque.) You get on average 36 to 41 mpg"

BMW would probably say - "too many mods / ECU software no longer standard (presumably the electrics have been modded as well)- you are on your own mate - by the way your M5 sounds a bit rough, sounds more like someone put a diesel in it"
Due to water ingress according to the other thread.

Pentoman

4,835 posts

292 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
Is that +49bhp from a map??

I think it looks brilliant, especially from the side. OK it's not an M5 but that doesn't really appeal to me, whereas I could entertain a 530d just about. So apart from looking like a moron pretend M5 you'd have a good looking car and a sensible spec. Might be shoddy riding though.

Fox-

13,575 posts

275 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
But why not just buy a 530d Sport which looks 95% the same anyway?

rassi

2,517 posts

280 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
"I have never taken the revs above 3.5 thousand revs and the previous owner who also looked after it as much as me didnt either." laugh

physprof

996 posts

216 months

Wednesday 8th October 2008
quotequote all
rassi said:
"I have never taken the revs above 3.5 thousand revs and the previous owner who also looked after it as much as me didnt either." laugh
that made me laugh too.... total plank of a seller.

so that'll be the m5 with the down spec'ed brakes..... same goes for muppet tuners who don't see that as necessary in their replicate offer

all fur coat and no knickers....

why oh why do people do this....

jamoor

14,506 posts

244 months

Thursday 9th October 2008
quotequote all
You can tell instantly, the boot is different from an M5.

Polarbert

17,936 posts

260 months

Thursday 9th October 2008
quotequote all
Its like the chick I saw driving an SLK y/day with 'V8 KOMPRESSOR' written down the side. hehe Sounded more like a 180 KOMPRESSOR!