Pistonheading By Numbers.
Discussion
In response to a number of accusations of late that PH is dumbing down I took a look round and I think 'they' are right, certainly in P&P anyway. Your average mouthbreather could post regularly using what have become six standard PH phrases and appear no different to quite a few members.
1. '335d mapped'.
2. '+1'.
3. 'End of'.
4. 'Kick her back doors in'.
5. 'Weapons grade c0ck/bellend...'
6. 'Simple as'.
It's getting boring to be honest. I come here to avoid the pap that's dished up on telly but even Big Brother (though I've never watched it) might be a step up before long.
I'm also making a prediction. Wonder if I'll be right?
1. '335d mapped'.
2. '+1'.
3. 'End of'.
4. 'Kick her back doors in'.
5. 'Weapons grade c0ck/bellend...'
6. 'Simple as'.
It's getting boring to be honest. I come here to avoid the pap that's dished up on telly but even Big Brother (though I've never watched it) might be a step up before long.
I'm also making a prediction. Wonder if I'll be right?
Flintstone said:
In response to a number of accusations of late that PH is dumbing down I took a look round and I think 'they' are right, certainly in P&P anyway.
OK then, let's raise the bar. Do you agree with Henri Bergson's opposition to Cartesian dualism, resisting the reduction of psychological phenomena to a natural level, and especially his insistence that there is no point of contact between the extended and the unextended?
Gaspode said:
Flintstone said:
In response to a number of accusations of late that PH is dumbing down I took a look round and I think 'they' are right, certainly in P&P anyway.
OK then, let's raise the bar. Do you agree with Henri Bergson's opposition to Cartesian dualism, resisting the reduction of psychological phenomena to a natural level, and especially his insistence that there is no point of contact between the extended and the unextended?Gaspode said:
OK then, let's raise the bar. Do you agree with Henri Bergson's opposition to Cartesian dualism, resisting the reduction of psychological phenomena to a natural level, and especially his insistence that there is no point of contact between the extended and the unextended?
Copyright Monty Python circa 1979.camgear said:
Flintstone said:
I'm also making a prediction. Wonder if I'll be right?
o.versteer said:
MX5.
I think you were right.
Flintstone said:
In response to a number of accusations of late that PH is dumbing down I took a look round and I think 'they' are right, certainly in P&P anyway. Your average mouthbreather could post regularly using what have become six standard PH phrases and appear no different to quite a few members.
1. '335d mapped'.
2. '+1'.
3. 'End of'.
4. 'Kick her back doors in'.
5. 'Weapons grade c0ck/bellend...'
6. 'Simple as'.
It's getting boring to be honest. I come here to avoid the pap that's dished up on telly but even Big Brother (though I've never watched it) might be a step up before long.
I'm also making a prediction. Wonder if I'll be right?
+11. '335d mapped'.
2. '+1'.
3. 'End of'.
4. 'Kick her back doors in'.
5. 'Weapons grade c0ck/bellend...'
6. 'Simple as'.
It's getting boring to be honest. I come here to avoid the pap that's dished up on telly but even Big Brother (though I've never watched it) might be a step up before long.
I'm also making a prediction. Wonder if I'll be right?
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff