Contracting Retainer
Contracting Retainer
Author
Discussion

Dusty Rhodes

Original Poster:

68 posts

220 months

Sunday 12th October 2008
quotequote all
All,

I will be speaking to my accountant about this but I would be grateful for your thoughts as well.

I am a director of my own limited company. My company has a client who pays quite well and wants to also add to this a retainer that increases the termination notice on my Cos side of the contract (which is though an agency). This is quite a decent amount of extra money which would be held over to a milestone or not paid at all if the company withdrew services.

I'm not sure about this and the potential exposure it would give to the dreaded 35.

Has anybody had similar and can anyone advise how best to go about this or alternatively a counter proposal that will keep my co. and me safe but still give the client what they want (security of provision of a certain service).

I had some thoughts about an increase in rate charged that is only finally invoiced at the milestone point but isn't termed a retainer in the contractual sense.

Edited by Dusty Rhodes on Sunday 12th October 16:32

Dusty Rhodes

Original Poster:

68 posts

220 months

Tuesday 14th October 2008
quotequote all
Has anybody got any thoughts on this?

thegreengoblet

1,040 posts

247 months

Tuesday 14th October 2008
quotequote all
I posted a reply yesterday... where's it gone!

Anyway.
I work in a similar way to yourself. A good few years back, a client wanted to ensure that I didn't go elsewhere and decided to offer me company shares over a 3 year period. This would of pointed to being employed so I turned the offer down. Instead, we agreed to lengthen the contracts and pay well above the market rate thus ensuring that I had no need to look elsewhere. I suggest you do the same.

Dusty Rhodes

Original Poster:

68 posts

220 months

Tuesday 14th October 2008
quotequote all
Thanks for that.

I can't see any reason why an extended contract termination notice period shouldn't be extended between the two parties. A service rate revision needn't be tied to this...

Good plan.