On in court tomorrow- advice quickly please!!!!
On in court tomorrow- advice quickly please!!!!
Author
Discussion

blueyes

Original Poster:

4,799 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
On in court tomorrow for speeding.

Somebody else filled in the form (we haven't disclosed this info yet... and might not) and didn't sign it. They didn't mention this fact and just came back with a offer of fixed penalty. We did nothing and now we have our day in court.

My solicitor is going to tell them that the 172 is not acceptable because it is unsigned. All they have are the photos which could be anybody. If they then decide to get me on the stand, can they ask me ANY questions or are they limited to certain ones? I would look through all the sites (pepipoo, speedsafe etc) but I'm up against it today and I need the info fast.
Thanks in advance.

Cooperman

4,428 posts

270 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
They can't get you onto the stand, nor can they question you. You are entitled to maintain your silence and your brief will simply discount their evidence, i.e. the unsigned NIP, by quoting HH Judge Ticehurst who has clearly stated that there is no requirement to sign under sect 172, and that without such evidence the NIP is not acceptable as a witness statement or confession. Also it cannot be accepted under PACE as you must have been told of your rights prior to making a voluntary confession under PACE - see the Safespeed site.
I think this is correct.
Don't give up!
If you lose you must immediately give notice of appeal.

dick dastardly

8,325 posts

283 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
I have heard similar to what cooperman is saying. It's probably best you wait for one of the Bibs or legal eagles to give their advice.

Hope it works out for you - stick it too 'em!

icamm

2,153 posts

280 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
They can't get you on the stand. Only you can volunteer to get up there - which is a bad idea unless you are willing to commit perjury. The prosecution can not require it.

Get all the information you can on R v Pickford and the Dwight York cases and make sure your solicitor knows the legal details of these CROWN Court cases inside out.

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

268 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
Cooperman said:
quoting HH Judge Ticehurst who has clearly stated that there is no requirement to sign under sect 172, and that without such evidence the NIP is not acceptable as a witness statement or confession.


HH Judge Ticehurst has been overturned by Judge Owen in Yorke & Maudesley in the High Court. Ticehurst was only the Crown Court. However, JO confirmed that an unsigned form is not admissable under Section 12. It is however acceptable as a confession.
Strangely, thus far, the CPS are not quoting this judgement; you can though. In any case, since blueyes did not fill in his form, it cannot be a confession. blueyes conforms to the Yorke part of the judgement; the judgement says that he must be acquitted.


>> Edited by jeffreyarcher on Thursday 2nd October 14:00

jjr1

3,032 posts

280 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
Are you in court tomorrow for Speeding or the 172 offence?

They are not the same

lucozade

2,574 posts

299 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
I've nothing valuable to input apart from a good luck message for tomorrow!

blueyes

Original Poster:

4,799 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
jjr1 said:
Are you in court tomorrow for Speeding or the 172 offence?

They are not the same


Speeding. BTW My brother filled in the form.

outlaw

1,893 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
there hopeing the pic looks like you m8

other wise there no case to answer try to look as unloke the pic as poss


dragstar

3,924 posts

270 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
isnt remaining silent an inference of guilt?

or have i got it wrong? (hope not..im a 3rd year law student!!!)

Pies

13,116 posts

276 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
The important bit is not that its unsigned but that he did not fill it out.Therefor it can not be used as evidence i.e it is not a confesion

Good luck

outlaw

1,893 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
dragstar said:
isnt remaining silent an inference of guilt?

or have i got it wrong? (hope not..im a 3rd year law student!!!)


its still the best option some times trust me

bobthebench

398 posts

283 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
Confessions should be proven in court by writ or oath. I.e. a signed confession (not here since no proof who signed therefore confessed), or by giving evidence on oath (Pronounce "It was me" from the witness box). As the accused you are not a compellable witness i.e. it's entirely your own choce whether you do or whether you don't give evidence. Your brother can be, so presumably he won't be in court tomorrow.

This means CPS must convince the bench beyond reasonable doubt that it was you speeding. Presumably they will have the photo. Do you still look like that ? (Don't shave your head tonight just too look different, it just looks suspicious). Trust brief has a sample of your handwriting as a production. Useful to show that it doesn't match 172, so cast the question who wrote what ?

Sounds very much like CPS either have a good mug-shot of you, or they're about to make an a@@@ of themselves. Hopefully the latter !

Golf_Fan

45 posts

271 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
GOOD LUCK!

Also from a selfish point of view can you please post back here what happens!?

Mad Dave

7,158 posts

283 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
Golf_Fan said:
GOOD LUCK!

Also from a selfish point of view can you please post back here what happens!?


Seconded (to both comments)

blueyes

Original Poster:

4,799 posts

272 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
O.K. well... case dismissed!

Few points, as advised by my solicitor, before you all start going mad.

1. All the way along they didn't contest the fact that he hadn't signed the 172, so the case was a plain speeding one.

2. This was a pre York/Mawdsley case.

3. The photos were shite.

4. He wasn't asked to take the stand.

5. Remember that only your wife or solicitor has "privilege" so they are the only ones that can fill the 172 form in for you and not get put on the stand.


FINAL POINT

Apparently my solicitors fame has spread and he's receiving calls daily. Trouble is it's mainly people who want advice over the phone for free. He's asked me to let you all know that he's totally clued up on speeding and will take on new cases but YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY!

If you want his details, email me off line.

206xsi

49,325 posts

268 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
wooooo-yay!

Mr John

574 posts

269 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
Well done Mester !

206xsi

49,325 posts

268 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
Blueyes - can you elaborate on why it was dismissed?

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

268 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
blueyes said:
2. This was a pre York/Mawdsley case.

AIUI that doesn't matter, the law was not changed. The judgement was merely a 'clarification' of the existing law. So, the question remains, why are the CPS not citing it?

However,