Metro Turbo Head
Metro Turbo Head
Author
Discussion

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
Does anyone know the nominal combustion chamber volume of a Metro Turbo 12G940 head? I can't find the manufacturer's data anywhere and I'm trying to do a comp ratio calc for a Turbo-engined Mini.

guru_1071

2,768 posts

255 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
pete

ref phone call

the turbo head is 21.4cc

std pistons are 12.5cc

and the std turbo cr is 9.46



Edited by guru_1071 on Friday 31st October 17:02

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Friday 31st October 2008
quotequote all
Thanks Rich,so Rover just used a standard 1275 head and just enlarged the ex valve stem diameters then. At leaswt I can open up the combustion chambers to get the CR down a bit more to a manageable figure like, say, about 8.4:1 which I reckon should be OK for 7 psi max boost.

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
The question noiw is whether I can grind just over 3.5 cc out of the combustion chamber without going through the water jacket and without having to mill the 'ceiling' of the chamber to increase the capacity by 'lowering the plane of the valve faces. Any thoughts?

trackcar

6,453 posts

247 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
What are the issues associated with running 7psi on the std compression ratio? the std ratio isn't very high, and 7psi isn't high boost either. If you're trying to stop something happening is there an alternative method of achieving it without losing compression?

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
The standard C.R. for the Metro Turbo is c.9.4:1 which is quite high for even a L.P. turbo the 4.5 psi., which is standard. To go to 7 psi boost, which is desired by the owner, does require lowering the C.R. to about 8.5:1 and fitting a customised distributor. If this is not done, even with a specially curved non-standard distributor, it runs a high risk of detonation and piston failure. The engine in question was re-built by an alleged 'engine builder' and had a geometrical c.r. of 10.45:1 (I know 'cause I just measured it accurately!). The ignition was not modified in any way and the boost was left as standard. It 'blew-up' after 4 miles. In fact, it blew up as soon as any turbo boost came on. The pistons, Hepolite 21253, not really suitable for a turbo application anyway, are destroyed.
I now have some Omega pistons to lower the c.r back to about 9.5:1, but must get each chamber volume out to about 24.5 cc from its current 21 cc in order to get down to 8.5:1. It was 21.4 cc, but I can see that the head was skimmed before the last build (4 miles ago!).

guru_1071

2,768 posts

255 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
pete

as emailed and discussion, but for others viewing

a 'beakless' a series head, allows large cc chambers, but ive never seen one done like this before.

strange eh?





SS HSV

9,646 posts

279 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Don't suppose a 'fat' head gasket would make much difference?

DanGT

753 posts

247 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
I have also heard of using head gaskets to reduse CR is this true for minis. I know the idea is sound.

FWDRacer

3,565 posts

245 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
Pete - I'm sure you are maximising the amount material removal / valve deshrouding with respect to the head gasket line, removal of the beak is the next bit to go. Only way you'll get the CC.

If my memory serves me right the beak is removed on really highly boosted A-series motors from V-max and similar as it overheats locally and causes pre-ignition.

Out of curiosity - What piston dish cc value on the Omega's?

Edited by FWDRacer on Tuesday 4th November 09:24

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
The pistons ae Omega 1015 with a dish of 10 cc. They also sit 0.034" lower in the bore than the Hepolites, which gives another 3.4 cc. With a BK450 gasket, the gasket volume is 4.0 cc so the head needs to be 24.5 cc to give just over 8.5:1, which I feel is about right for about 7 psi max boost.
I reckon I can get almost that amount out be removing the beak, de-shrouding to the max. The only problem is that my air compressor is playing up as of last evening, but I have a guy coming to fix it, hopefully tomorrow. Then it's 'grind away' time.
I just can't believe that anyone building an engine and charging for the work would build a turbo unit with 10.45:1 comp. ratio.

Thanks for all the advice,
Peter

annodomini2

6,959 posts

272 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
Pete,



Someone will need to confirm it, but I believe the casting is slightly thicker on the turbo heads to allow the extra machining.

As you probably know they run sodium filled Exhaust valves, hence the thicker stem.

The metro ran a 4.5psi wastegate, but used a bleed valve to achieve 7psi with the electronic controller. The problem wasn't due the engine not being able to handle it, but the gearbox. With too much torque at low rpm.

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
Andy,
I have heard that the heads were the same as any other 1275, thinner with larger waterways to help with cooling and thicker to provide more strength. In the mist of time, who knows? However, I do intend to sort out this engine so that it runs well, won't 'blow-up' and will give reasonable power. My customer doesn't want to go to the expense of a 4-pin diff, so I'm fitting a new comp. diff pin (thanks, Rich) with new planets, thrusts, etc.
A 'custom-curved' Aldon dizzy to match the final spec and a boost limit of 7 psi should do the trick.
By the way, I love your original 'S' rockers.
Peter

annodomini2

6,959 posts

272 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
Cooperman said:
Andy,
I have heard that the heads were the same as any other 1275, thinner with larger waterways to help with cooling and thicker to provide more strength. In the mist of time, who knows? However, I do intend to sort out this engine so that it runs well, won't 'blow-up' and will give reasonable power. My customer doesn't want to go to the expense of a 4-pin diff, so I'm fitting a new comp. diff pin (thanks, Rich) with new planets, thrusts, etc.
A 'custom-curved' Aldon dizzy to match the final spec and a boost limit of 7 psi should do the trick.
By the way, I love your original 'S' rockers.
Peter
Wish they were mine, just a random pic I found on the net showing the difference in port area.

I've just a 998 city project atm.

I do want my friends engine though 1380 16v Turbo, been on the dyno producing in excess of 300bhp.

Couldn't tell you how reliable that will be and he's still trying to get a gearbox built to handle the power.

But getting the urge for another turbo engined pickup.

FWDRacer

3,565 posts

245 months

Wednesday 5th November 2008
quotequote all
Pete - You'd have been better off leaving the diff pin. The original one would have been fine, they work harden - A brand new diff pin with the torque of your Turbo engine may well see it fail.

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Wednesday 5th November 2008
quotequote all
The problem is that it already has some play in it so I really have to change it. I once had a pin in my 'S' diff that wore down until the thickness of the pin in the planet wheel area was about 3/16". I don't know why it didn't just snap especially as it was like that for the last few tests of a rally. That's when I first went 'cross-pin'.

Cooperman

Original Poster:

4,428 posts

271 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I just finished grinding out the combustion chambers and I got a nice 25 cc in each which gives a geometric c.r. of 8.5. I reckon that with a good custom-curved dizzy from Aldon and an intercooler, running 97 octane fuel nit will set-up nicely with 7 psi boost.
I'll put the block onto the box this afternoon and time in the cam. That'll keep me busy for a few hours.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

276 months

Saturday 22nd November 2008
quotequote all
A bit late now, but it's entirely possible to run 7psi with the stock CR if you ditch the useless clockwork distributor and run a mapped ignition system (it certainly detonates with the stock system running). The addition of an intercooler makes this even safer.

Just FYI, if you can find a set the pistons fitted to the 1275 Metro Van have a bigger dish that gives around 8.5:1 with the stock head and are strong enough to handle 7psi. Just a shame the gearbox has the lifespan of a mayfly!

annodomini2

6,959 posts

272 months

Saturday 22nd November 2008
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
A bit late now, but it's entirely possible to run 7psi with the stock CR if you ditch the useless clockwork distributor and run a mapped ignition system (it certainly detonates with the stock system running). The addition of an intercooler makes this even safer.

Just FYI, if you can find a set the pistons fitted to the 1275 Metro Van have a bigger dish that gives around 8.5:1 with the stock head and are strong enough to handle 7psi. Just a shame the gearbox has the lifespan of a mayfly!
The main reason for 4psi with 7psi bleed was the gearbox reliability, they are still wear much faster than a NA engine.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

276 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Mr2Mike said:
A bit late now, but it's entirely possible to run 7psi with the stock CR if you ditch the useless clockwork distributor and run a mapped ignition system (it certainly detonates with the stock system running). The addition of an intercooler makes this even safer.

Just FYI, if you can find a set the pistons fitted to the 1275 Metro Van have a bigger dish that gives around 8.5:1 with the stock head and are strong enough to handle 7psi. Just a shame the gearbox has the lifespan of a mayfly!
The main reason for 4psi with 7psi bleed was the gearbox reliability, they are still wear much faster than a NA engine.
Yes it is was, limiting the boost to 4 PSI reduced peak torque sufficiently to limit warranty reapirs to an acceptable level. However, simply adding a spring to the wastegate or using a bleed vale to run at 7psi does cause detonation on an otherwise stock engine. My uncle had a Mk1 Turbo many years back and briefly tried this, but detonation was quite audible. He ended up with the aforementioned van pistons, a ported head and running 10psi boost with no detonation. It was a very quick little car, but the double roller gearbox bearing had a life of around 5-6000 miles frown