BMW Z3....Good/Bad/Ugly
BMW Z3....Good/Bad/Ugly
Author
Discussion

Munter

Original Poster:

31,330 posts

258 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
What are peoples thoughts on the BMW Z3?

What with the MX5 being a bit tatty, I keep thinking about replacements. But with more power.

There's 1,000,000 different types of engine BMW fitted, and there has to have been some revisions. But in general they look quite cheap to buy.

Are they a reliable, fun, reliable, 2seat, easy to insure, reliable, good handling car? Or are they a bag of randomly selected bolts on a soggy chassis which constantly need attention?

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

243 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
I have no idea what they're like to drive but I do think that the one with the chrome vent wossnames in the sides is a pretty little roadster.

GPSS

694 posts

228 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
From what I have read, the only ones worth having are the bigger engines, 2.8, 3.0 straight six's etc. Build quality is good, handle well etc, I think they make a better buy than an MX5. A 98S 2.8 with 60K FSH went through the auction recently for £3750.

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

225 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Didnt like it at all. Had a hard ride, but not particularly good handling. the 2.2 6 pot I drove didnt feel fast at all.

Munter

Original Poster:

31,330 posts

258 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
GPSS said:
From what I have read, the only ones worth having are the bigger engines, 2.8, 3.0 straight six's etc. Build quality is good, handle well etc, I think they make a better buy than an MX5. A 98S 2.8 with 60K FSH went through the auction recently for £3750.
With the 2.8 at those prices (+ a bit if not auction obviously) it's starting to look like a good buy..... Any good on occasional track days?

davejones81

93 posts

207 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Absolute classic in my opinion, great looking car. And i love the m3 coupe cloud9

Negative Creep

25,587 posts

244 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Well it certainly is ugly

Munter

Original Poster:

31,330 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Yes yes looks pretty/ugly. But so far we have one opinion that it's handling isn't exactly great.

Dave my friendly in head voice is saying (Stop asking on the internet and bloody well drive one you prat....) but it'd be nice to get sme more opinions from owners about running costs etc.....

Guibo

274 posts

282 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Have only driven the coupe version (which looks much better than the convertible IMO), a 2.8. Steering is very good. Quick, a little on the heavy side (which I prefer), linear, with good feel. At the time, it was rated even higher than the M version's. Fun car, but the stock damping, especially at the rear, leaves a lot to be desired. Owners report switching to Bilsteins improves the handling as well as the ride. Semi-trailing arm design was a step behind when the car was introduced.

Ravell

1,181 posts

229 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
The chassis of the Z3 supposedly lacks stiffness, comprimising the handling in convertible form, although apparently it's fine as a hard top.

Steering is quicker than e36 3 series (including m3) upon which it's based and is said to be quite good.

Munter

Original Poster:

31,330 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Ravell said:
The chassis of the Z3 supposedly lacks stiffness, comprimising the handling in convertible form, although apparently it's fine as a hard top.

Steering is quicker than e36 3 series (including m3) upon which it's based and is said to be quite good.
Unfortunately I'm not seeing any tin top versions in my bottom of the barrel price range.

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/663535.htm Is about what I was thinking. Floppy softtop chassis and soft rear suspention doesn't sound great though. And I'm wanting to replace the MX with a car I can keep "stock" to avoid increased insurance premiums.

Edited by Munter on Friday 28th November 10:42

Orangecurry

7,692 posts

223 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
I had a 2.8 with m-tech suspension fitted at the factory - I had it for four years and I loved the handling. The build quality was excellent - all of that age were built in America, then shipped over to Germany for a final fitting.

Re handling - it's the same chassis set-up as the E36 compact, which is (near enough) the same as the previous E30. So rear-trailing arms, not the much 'better' z-link axle thing at the back which was fitted to the rest of the E36 range.

Oversteer happens when called for, and in a controllable fashion - yes even in a lowly 2.8 (which has a wider track and bodywork at the back than the smaller engined models). If you can find one with the 17" 'round-spoke' alloys, they fill the arches and look good AND are easy to clean.

A 'good' handling car? No.

A superb, entertaining and yet forgiving drivers car, on real roads and real driving experiences? Oh yes.

(ps I only got rid of it because we had kids and so I changed to a 2+2.)



Edited by Orangecurry on Friday 28th November 12:15

Mr Whippy

31,474 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
The 3.0's are really good value now... was having a look last night actually smile

I think StuB still has his Z3s, it's a 2.8 with an ESS supercharger for about 320bhp, and has the older style Alpina alloys. It really does look VERY smart and goes very well too!

If I ever had a Z3 I'd have to copy that look smile

Dave

Munter

Original Poster:

31,330 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Orangecurry said:
I had a 2.8 with m-tech suspension fitted at the factory - I had it for four years and I loved the handling. The build quality was excellent - all of that age were built in America, then shipped over to Germany for a final fitting.

Re handling - it's the same chassis set-up as the E36 compact, which is (near enough) the same as the previous E30. So rear-trailing arms, not the much 'better' z-link axle thing at the back which was fitted to the rest of the E36 range.

Oversteer happens when called for, and in a controllable fashion - yes even in a lowly 2.8 (which has a wider track and bodywork at the back than the smaller engined models). If you can find one with the 17" 'round-spoke' alloys, they fill the arches and look good AND are easy to clean.

A 'good' handling car? No.

A superb, entertaining and yet forgiving drivers car, on real roads and real driving experiences? Oh yes.

(ps I only got rid of it because we had kids and so I changed to a 2+2.)



Edited by Orangecurry on Friday 28th November 12:15
Nothing broke, fell off, was unexpectedly expensive? I might have to find one to test drive...

Don

28,378 posts

301 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
I drove one for a couple of weeks around New Zealand.

Handling is, err, not very sharp. But it had a good ride and was comfy on a long journey. Roof goes up and down in a hot minute. Boot's a bit small. Build quality was excellent.

We drove the 2.2 and it was a tad gutless. Some more grunt would definitely suit the car. The Z3M is, by repute, a monster but comes with bigger servicing bills.

TTwiggy

11,796 posts

221 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
hmmm - I'm getting quite tempted by one of these myself. I've always liked the looks, and I think they've aged well (would like one in black with crome bits...)

When the Elise goes in the summer I can't really justify another £25K+ car in these 'uncertain' times, so a 3.0 Z3 is an intersting proposition...

Given that nothing will be able to compete with the Liz on the handling front, I'm not too bothered, but for a nice bit of top down motoring, with a good engine up front, it seems a nice idea...

Mr Whippy

31,474 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
Given that nothing will be able to compete with the Liz on the handling front, I'm not too bothered, but for a nice bit of top down motoring, with a good engine up front, it seems a nice idea...
I think as with most cars, you can get it more for your wants/needs, rather than the generic ones BMW chose for their target demographic.

Afaik, there are some good suspension packages out there for the Z3's!

Dave

Munter

Original Poster:

31,330 posts

258 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
TTwiggy said:
hmmm - I'm getting quite tempted by one of these myself. I've always liked the looks, and I think they've aged well (would like one in black with crome bits...)

When the Elise goes in the summer I can't really justify another £25K+ car in these 'uncertain' times, so a 3.0 Z3 is an intersting proposition...

Given that nothing will be able to compete with the Liz on the handling front, I'm not too bothered, but for a nice bit of top down motoring, with a good engine up front, it seems a nice idea...
It's just the comments like Dons "Handling is, err, not very sharp." that put me off a bit. The MX and I presume the Elise have such great steering feel. And I like that. I have the Vectra for vague handling if I want that....

kit80

4,764 posts

204 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Not the greatest looking car IMO but not exactly ugly either, but to drive it I didnt really enjoy it, handling was er lumpy, brakes were shocking, interior was yuk. I actually was happy to get back in my 1litre!!

bga

8,134 posts

268 months

Friday 28th November 2008
quotequote all
Compared to an MX-5 or mk3 MR2 I have been unimpressed by the non-M versions I have driven. The 2.8/3.0 engines are nice though.