Tory Mp arrested for leaking sensitive information.
Tory Mp arrested for leaking sensitive information.
Author
Discussion

CivicMan

Original Poster:

2,211 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Has the government totally lost it?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7753557.stm

Seeming arrested and questioned for uncovering some unsavoury facts that the government would like kept quiet.

Very sinister overtones this........ this guy is a front bench MP. Very scary.

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
He should've just put all the info onto his laptop and left it in Burger Kingrolleyes

playerone

872 posts

239 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Early days but a very scary precedent. I am off to a fashion tinfoil hats for the whole family!

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Stalin shows his true colours. Worrying...

*******

853 posts

219 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Mandelson.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
******* said:
Mandelson.
yes

Pupp

12,948 posts

301 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
why 'sinister'?

Looks like the misfeasance alleged is on the part of an official and the MP is suspected of encouraging or commissioning that. Has always been a serious offence, probably the most serious you can commit in public life given it strikes at the seat of government. Do you think it acceptable in a democracy for civil servants to pursue their own agendas rather than the policies of the executive?


randlemarcus

13,646 posts

260 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Pupp said:
why 'sinister'?

Looks like the misfeasance alleged is on the part of an official and the MP is suspected of encouraging or commissioning that. Has always been a serious offence, probably the most serious you can commit in public life given it strikes at the seat of government. Do you think it acceptable in a democracy for civil servants to pursue their own agendas rather than the policies of the executive?
Absolutely acceptable. Personally, I'd rather the information was leaked to the Her Majesty's Opposition than the Yellow Press, and significantly rather it was leaked than not leaked at all.

I'd suggest though, that this is a case of "turbulent priest" than Mandelson going directly for the Shadow Immigration Minister.

s3fella

10,524 posts

216 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
I am couting the days to the next election when we can stand up for ourselves and tell these clowns what we really think of them.



Edited by s3fella on Thursday 27th November 22:42

Pupp

12,948 posts

301 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ahem.... Westland, ahem.... supergun, .... Zircon project... Arms to Iraq... Matrix Churchill

elster

17,517 posts

239 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
The fact is too much rubbish is published.

Would rather a lot is kept secret. The general public are f**king morons, best they know most things really.

Pupp

12,948 posts

301 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
So, that's what's being reported so far. Let's wait and see what else has been occurring (if anything)

Simpo Two

92,709 posts

294 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
I think the charge is the new offence of 'Not Agreeing With The Government'.


This lot really do need to be on the lamposts down Pall Mall soon.

CobolMan

1,430 posts

236 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
s3fella said:
I am couting the days to the next election when we can stand up for ourselves and tell these clowns what we really think of them.



Edited by s3fella on Thursday 27th November 22:42
Assuming that by then we'll be able to vote.........

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
I was out for dinner and burning to post this, hence my (astonishingly quickly closed) repost.

Labour is beginning to show signs of being a paranoid dictatorship.


Riley15/6

105 posts

219 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
And how many opposition party front bench spokesmen were arrested over these leaks?

How many parliamentary offices were searched?

And in those days we still had the right to protest!

*******

853 posts

219 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
They're testing the water.

DucatiGary

7,765 posts

254 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
s3fella said:
I am couting the days to the next election when we can stand up for ourselves and tell these clowns what we really think of them.
but why count the days, surely we can initiate an election without having to let the morons lose more and more

Pupp

12,948 posts

301 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No, I'm just illustrating the point that all British governments, regardless of colour, are prone to playing the national security card when it suits their purpose. While I'm at it, I'll point out the fact they can still do this without judicial intervention is largely due to the successful GCHQ challenge by Thatcher's govt to trades union membership that turned on the evidence of Marge's cabinet secretary Robert Armstrong who later proved himself to be less than 'credible' (shall we say) in Spycatcher

Teppic

8,076 posts

286 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Zod said:
Labour is beginning to show signs of being a paranoid dictatorship.
Beginning?!?

Edited by Teppic on Thursday 27th November 23:04