Latest unemployment figures..
Latest unemployment figures..
Author
Discussion

Cookie172

Original Poster:

856 posts

240 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7736303.stm

1.8m, with 8m "economically inactive"

Christ that's a lot of scroungers (obviously not including people who've fallen on hard times or genuinly have proper illnesses)

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
60m in the country, 10m not contributing.

16.666666667%

Nice work Labour.

Skipppy

1,136 posts

239 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Economically inactive basically means living on benefits, correct?

Cookie172

Original Poster:

856 posts

240 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7746174.stm

It also links to this venomous harridan.. sorry state of affairs

EdJ

1,388 posts

224 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
This idea that there is less than 2 million unemployed always seemed crazy to me. It's another example of spin where the figures are manipulated to the extent that they are meaningless. It's the same with inflation figures - the government just change the criteria to make the numbers say what they want them to say. banghead

EdJ

1,388 posts

224 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
And don't forget all the non-jobs in the public sector - with their fat pension and benefits packages. If you split the population into GDP contributors and non-contributors, I think it would be quite frightening.

JagLover

46,762 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
EdJ said:
And don't forget all the non-jobs in the public sector - with their fat pension and benefits packages. If you split the population into GDP contributors and non-contributors, I think it would be quite frightening.
In many towns now over half those working work for the state. Add on those reliant on the state through benefits and there is a 'client state' majority in many regions.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
JagLover said:
EdJ said:
And don't forget all the non-jobs in the public sector - with their fat pension and benefits packages. If you split the population into GDP contributors and non-contributors, I think it would be quite frightening.
In many towns now over half those working work for the state. Add on those reliant on the state through benefits and there is a 'client state' majority in many regions.
Nationally 25% are employed by the state.

turbobloke

117,176 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
EdJ said:
And don't forget all the non-jobs in the public sector - with their fat pension and benefits packages.
yes

25% of our Council Tax bills pays for town hall pensions.

rich1231

17,340 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Then add to that the culture and promotion of envy of those doing better and we have a fabulous country.

smile

fatboy b

9,665 posts

245 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Skipppy said:
Economically inactive basically means living on benefits, correct?
If you read the article, it includes 2.2m (mostly women) looking after home & family - in other words house wives, not necessarily drawing benefits to live on.

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

271 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Cookie172 said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7736303.stm

1.8m, with 8m "economically inactive"

Christ that's a lot of scroungers (obviously not including people who've fallen on hard times or genuinly have proper illnesses)
it is going to get so much worse

v15ben

16,222 posts

270 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Does that mean those of us working for private companies and in a household with no benefits claimants are in a minority then?

Semi-serious question for a change!

yikes

Andy Zarse

10,870 posts

276 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
The frightening thing is how are all these benefits going to be paid? The credit crunch is leading to a collapse in tax revenues to the Treasury. Stamp Duty on property transfer has virtually vanished, CGT will be nugatory as everything is down in value, corporation tax receipts will be much lower as any decent finance director will be writing off assets and generally fking with his balance sheet. Oh and of course The Badger's cut VAT too. So guess who's gonna pay? The middle income earners through increased income tax/NI, not that there'll be many of them left...

Darling's poppycock spend/borrow predictions in the pre-budget report are laughably way way below what will be required without cutting public services. FWIW I would love to see Labour win the next election just to stop the public sector Unions bleating about "Tory Cuts".

We simply cannot afford to go on like this.

Edited by Andy Zarse on Wednesday 3rd December 10:31

Andy Zarse

10,870 posts

276 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I can only thank God that the Labour Govt hasn't gotten this country involved in some nonsensical wars abroad, which would cost this country a fortune and create ill-will against us within the international community such as to create a two-fingered response when we go cap in hand...


Erm...


Doh!!

jesusbuiltmycar

5,129 posts

283 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
OT I know but it does make me laugh...

Maggie Thatcher may have taken my milk away as a kid, but Gordon Brown took my pension, which has/will hurt me a damn site more...

JagLover

46,762 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
What makes me laugh is that Labour are doing better and better in the polls.

They announce that everyone will be paying an extra 0.5% NI, the public finances are shot, and that everyone earning over a 100K should bend over for a shafting and the public seem pleased.


turbobloke

117,176 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
JagLover said:
What makes me laugh is that Labour are doing better and better in the polls.

They announce that everyone will be paying an extra 0.5% NI, the public finances are shot, and that everyone earning over a 100K should bend over for a shafting and the public seem pleased.
Voting requires age, a pen and self-interest not intelligence or understanding.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
frown

Marrying a Canadian (even a moose!) is looking like a better and better idea.