Mandela (the early years) ?
Discussion
There aren't "rumours"...
Sabotage, conspiracy to kill, fund raising for a terrorist organisation, treason (well, equivalent of it in SA), planned guerilla warfare, violated human rights (eg the Church Street Massacre), complicit in torture at ANC 're-education camps' in Angola, Uganda and Tanzania. And so on.
Sabotage, conspiracy to kill, fund raising for a terrorist organisation, treason (well, equivalent of it in SA), planned guerilla warfare, violated human rights (eg the Church Street Massacre), complicit in torture at ANC 're-education camps' in Angola, Uganda and Tanzania. And so on.
Read The Long Walk To Freedom, his autobiography, yes it's his words. But what comes over is an icy determination, on his part. He was as hard as nails. Just discover his time boxing. Then read any more recent interviews with his children and you'll find out they are not big fans. Hardly surprising, he spent 27 years in prison and then ran the country, not much time in his life for them. Like most large figures in history he was as heavy as he needed to be, when it was required. Otherwise he'd still be a struggling bloke working on the Reef in Jo'berg.
He was a leading figure in the ANC which at the time was involved in an armed struggle: bombings, sabotage etc. To be fair, he had tried for some time to bring an end to apartheid politically but had got nowhere. I get the impression that whatever the ANC did, it was overshadowed massively by atrocities committed by the SA governments of the day.
He was a murdering scum bag!
All in the name of politics though. I mean we all love those Muslim terrorists that are blowing themselves up, as the current system isn't right. The IRA are still all loved after all the innocent people they killed as well.
Mugabe is only killing innocent people in the name of politics, as was Hitler.
(Maybe slight exaggeration, but you get the idea)
All in the name of politics though. I mean we all love those Muslim terrorists that are blowing themselves up, as the current system isn't right. The IRA are still all loved after all the innocent people they killed as well.
Mugabe is only killing innocent people in the name of politics, as was Hitler.
(Maybe slight exaggeration, but you get the idea)
Edited by elster on Sunday 7th December 20:53
tinman0 said:
blackburnbmw said:
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, and vice versa.
And generally a left wing lie. Its a way of dehumanising the tragic consequences of murdering innocent people in the name of a bankrupt cause. Simpo Two said:
Depends where you're standing. If you happened to be a soldier in the German army occupying France, you'd have considered the French Resistance to be terrorists. And yet from our (victorious) POV they were heroes.
cmon, do you really believe that? That a German army officer based in France legitimately believes that the French Resistance is a terrorist rather than the officer understanding that he's part of an invading army?tinman0 said:
Simpo Two said:
Depends where you're standing. If you happened to be a soldier in the German army occupying France, you'd have considered the French Resistance to be terrorists. And yet from our (victorious) POV they were heroes.
cmon, do you really believe that? That a German army officer based in France legitimately believes that the French Resistance is a terrorist rather than the officer understanding that he's part of an invading army?Blue Meanie said:
tinman0 said:
Simpo Two said:
Depends where you're standing. If you happened to be a soldier in the German army occupying France, you'd have considered the French Resistance to be terrorists. And yet from our (victorious) POV they were heroes.
cmon, do you really believe that? That a German army officer based in France legitimately believes that the French Resistance is a terrorist rather than the officer understanding that he's part of an invading army?Cousin's back over in Iraq, he's an MP over there.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



