A hill too far
A hill too far
Author
Discussion

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
I live in an up/down country environment with narrow lanes and a lot of small but steep gradients.

Yesterday was going to do the school pick up, and travelling down one of these roads with a icy hill facing me.

Gave it a bit of well heading toward the hill, but halfway up the tyres were unable to hold grip, and I was left spinning and unable to make the wheel go slow enough to gain traction. Tried a couple of times, the last of which was some very lary snaking, so I thought I'd better call it a day.

The small audi behind me thought this was very funny till I had to explain to him he'd have to reverse cos I was unable to go forward and would have to find another way to the school. smile

Being stationary on a small country lane is very bad if you stay in one place more than a few minutes as a traffic jam ensues very quickly. Invariably ending with one or two people who either won't or can't reverse.

So I was thinking, reduce the pressure in the tyres, carry a bag of potatoes in the boot, winter tyres on a Cerb, change to a narrow winter width of tyre. Anyone else got a solution?

rev-erend

21,623 posts

314 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
I believe more weight is the solution..

So you had best stuff yourself stupid at Christmas and offer lifts to heavy people.. biggrin

FUBAR

17,065 posts

268 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
offer lifts to heavy people.. biggrin
[John Inman] I'm free wavey [/John Inman]

touching cloth

11,706 posts

269 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Just need more speed on the initial approach, really give it some, only way to drive in these conditions hehe

Brummmie

5,284 posts

251 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Thinner tyres will give more grip as they increase lbs/square inch, like snow tyres in rallying.

UpTheIron

4,058 posts

298 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Happened to me in my previous Chim once. I gave up after about an hour of trying...as soon as I saw an UR Quattro fail on the same hill as I was preparing another run up it was time to start walking!

Dirty Boy

14,864 posts

239 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Can of de-icer on the road?

ETA

Considering I've got through a whole can in just two icy mornings, you'll need a lot hehe

You could carry a blow torch?

Lay down a blanket?

Bucket of salt/grit?

Not drive up hills?

Edited by Dirty Boy on Friday 12th December 12:23

Nefarious

989 posts

295 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Brummmie said:
Thinner tyres will give more grip as they increase lbs/square inch, like snow tyres in rallying.
Not this again - changing the width of tyres only changes the shape of the contact patch, not the size of the contact patch (for a given vehicle weight and tyre pressure).

A longer, thinner contact patch may be more successful at finding longditudinal grip, either by cutting through a low-friction layer (e.g. on snow), or by exploiting friction inconsistancies on the road surface (e.g. on patchy ice or a road surface with high mechanical interlock).

cerbieboy

292 posts

237 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
bag of rock salt in the boot? more weight and there to melt the ice in question.

Bodmin

596 posts

228 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
TVR Moneypit said:
scratchchin

Flamethrower?
Disconnect the exhaust from the cats, that'll do it.....not sure if the tarmac with melt as well though hehe

longbow

1,610 posts

265 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
You need a pair of these;

http://www.roofbox.co.uk/autosock/

Just got a set for the rears on the Cerb prior to my trip to Switzerland. Arrived today so will trial fit them tomorrow, but look very useful indeed.

greenm

473 posts

230 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
They look pretty clever and could be great when you get a lot of snow while you are out! Back to the hill and ice, go up backwards then it becomes a front wheel driven car and works a lot better? really try it??

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Hmmm, 400bhp vs damp sock.........damp sock vs 400 bhp........
.
.
.
.
.
Nope each way I look at that, there is something wrong.

JensenA

5,671 posts

260 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Nefarious said:
Brummmie said:
Thinner tyres will give more grip as they increase lbs/square inch, like snow tyres in rallying.
Not this again - changing the width of tyres only changes the shape of the contact patch, not the size of the contact patch (for a given vehicle weight and tyre pressure).

A longer, thinner contact patch may be more successful at finding longditudinal grip, either by cutting through a low-friction layer (e.g. on snow), or by exploiting friction inconsistancies on the road surface (e.g. on patchy ice or a road surface with high mechanical interlock).
Brummie's right - And of course they change the size of the contact patch, they're narrower.

ro_butler

795 posts

301 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
JensenA said:
Nefarious said:
Brummmie said:
Thinner tyres will give more grip as they increase lbs/square inch, like snow tyres in rallying.
Not this again - changing the width of tyres only changes the shape of the contact patch, not the size of the contact patch (for a given vehicle weight and tyre pressure).

A longer, thinner contact patch may be more successful at finding longditudinal grip, either by cutting through a low-friction layer (e.g. on snow), or by exploiting friction inconsistancies on the road surface (e.g. on patchy ice or a road surface with high mechanical interlock).
Brummie's right - And of course they change the size of the contact patch, they're narrower.
DOH! biggrin No it doesn't it only changes the shape of the contact patch. Try it with some ballons, weights and a sheet of glass.

Edited by ro_butler on Friday 12th December 18:01

JensenA

5,671 posts

260 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
ro_butler said:
JensenA said:
Nefarious said:
Brummmie said:
Thinner tyres will give more grip as they increase lbs/square inch, like snow tyres in rallying.
Not this again - changing the width of tyres only changes the shape of the contact patch, not the size of the contact patch (for a given vehicle weight and tyre pressure).

A longer, thinner contact patch may be more successful at finding longditudinal grip, either by cutting through a low-friction layer (e.g. on snow), or by exploiting friction inconsistancies on the road surface (e.g. on patchy ice or a road surface with high mechanical interlock).
Brummie's right - And of course they change the size of the contact patch, they're narrower.
DOH! No it doesn't it only changes the shape of the contact patch. Try it with some ballons, weights and a sheet of glass.
Oh.... I'm wasting money by buying 245 rears then ? I'll put a set of 145's on next time - if they give exactly the same size contact patch.

Nefarious

989 posts

295 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
OK, Physics 101:

Normal force excerted upwards by the ground = total weight of the car
Normal force excerted upwards by the ground = pressure in the tyres x area over which that pressure acts (i.e. the contact patch)

Ergo, unless you change the weight of the car or the pressure in the tyres, the size of the contact patch cannot change. If you halve the width, the tyre will deform to double the length.

[Pedant protection]Actually, in the real world it's not quite true that a 50% reduction in width will equal a 100% increase in length, due to small contributions from the stiffness of the sidewall, inconsistancies in the way the tyre deforms, and the fact that neither the road nor the tyre are perfectly smooth. But it's pretty close [/pedeant protection]

markh1

2,846 posts

239 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Nefarious said:
Ergo, unless you change the weight of the car or the pressure in the tyres, the size of the contact patch cannot change. If you halve the width, the tyre will deform to double the length.
But surely when you use narrow tires you increase the pressure to offset the 'squashing' of the tires?

Or you could stick some mud terrains on. I have a set of 33 inch muds you could borrow but clearanc may be an issue. hehe

JensenA

5,671 posts

260 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Nefarious said:
OK, Physics 101:

........... the size of the contact patch cannot change. If you halve the width, the tyre will deform to double the length.
How can it? The Tyre is round, and it's attached to a rigid Alloy wheel. Maybe you are theorising and ignoring the practicalities of the real world.

julian64

Original Poster:

14,325 posts

284 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Nefarious said:
OK, Physics 101:

Normal force excerted upwards by the ground = total weight of the car
Normal force excerted upwards by the ground = pressure in the tyres x area over which that pressure acts (i.e. the contact patch)

Ergo, unless you change the weight of the car or the pressure in the tyres, the size of the contact patch cannot change. If you halve the width, the tyre will deform to double the length.

[Pedant protection]Actually, in the real world it's not quite true that a 50% reduction in width will equal a 100% increase in length, due to small contributions from the stiffness of the sidewall, inconsistancies in the way the tyre deforms, and the fact that neither the road nor the tyre are perfectly smooth. But it's pretty close [/pedeant protection]
Nope, I think you are wrong. If the tyre was a balloon I'd agree with you, but I think as your last paragraph seems to intimate, the size width and tyre wall are probably more powerful influences than the pressure.

Jens right, if the contact other factors other than those you mentioned are irrelevent then there'd be no point in slicks for santa pod. We should just have bike tyres with better compound