2.5/3.0
Author
Discussion

Duke Thrust

Original Poster:

1,680 posts

268 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Sorry if this old ground chaps but I'm just wondering about the real world difference between the 2.5 and 3.0.

Is there much to be gained from the 3.0? From what I've read it's heavier (true?) but has more power?


Lakelord

1,756 posts

233 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
The additional weight is more than compensated for by the additional power but the main advantage is when you go to a 3R as the majority (not the early ones) come with 6 Spd Gearbox and LSD. It's common for the diff's to go on the 2.5's and 3.0's which is an 'engine-out' job and the 2.5's were also prone to ECU issues. As such, my advice would be to go for a 3R unless you can afford an M400? Failing that, a sorted 2.5 or 3.0 will give you a shed-load of fun.

mgbond

6,749 posts

261 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Owens old one is for sale in ebay. that is a very well sorted bloody quick 2.5.

Bondy

jimbooo

334 posts

216 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
i have the 2.5, damn quick and loads of fun but seems to fall apart every 500 miles.

hoping these are teething problems!

the mrs wants shot of it but i am clinging on by my fingernails. great fun on and off the road lol

gizard

2,272 posts

312 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
If weight is a problem - 3R are supposed to have more sound proofing and therefore weight over the 3.0 and 2.5's

rsnoble

356 posts

217 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
[only every 500 miles you have got a good one then, haha smile iv got the 2.5 its not slow but i realy want that extra bit of power!!! would be nice to go out in a 3lt to see the differance!!! mine tenda to fall apart lucky i no wot im doing or it would have cost me £££££££££ and some tho it bloody good fun when it not faling apart lol







quote=jimbooo]i have the 2.5, damn quick and loads of fun but seems to fall apart every 500 miles.

hoping these are teething problems!

the mrs wants shot of it but i am clinging on by my fingernails. great fun on and off the road lol
[/quote]

Gadgeroonie

5,362 posts

265 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
the 2.5 has less power but revs better

they can be tuned to go better than the 3.0 also

Adrian W

15,493 posts

257 months

Friday 12th December 2008
quotequote all
Gadgeroonie said:
the 2.5 has less power but revs better

they can be tuned to go better than the 3.0 also
You might need to explain that one?

Nicksy

226 posts

232 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
rsnoble said:
iv got the 2.5 its not slow but i realy want that extra bit of power!!! would be nice to go out in a 3lt to see the differance!!!
Dude

When we finally get to meet up you can have a spin in mine.driving Ive got a modified 3ltr engine with a 5 speed box and std diff. I think that the only limitation is if you have a std diff like mine, then you can only go to about 340/350ftlb torque. If you have an LSD you can get a lot more biggrin I think that generally there is not much difference as standard cars, but as stated the 2.5 suffers from ECU problems and that’s when they go off the boil!!
And also its a bit to do with how you drive the car!!!nuts

Nicksy

jimbooo

334 posts

216 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
my 2.5 had the ecu problem so the last owner added an aftermarket one. I have a certificate to verify 350bhp. It is boosting to 1.2 bar at the moment which is probably why i'm splitting manifolds by the week. I'm going to get it on a rolling road asap to see what is actually going. on. It also has the 3r front clam so basically is just like a gto 3 but with more boost and less engine lol

rsnoble

356 posts

217 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
sounds good hurry up next year and hot weather, when you say they suffer from ecu probs, is it the maps or do they just pack up?

jimbooo

334 posts

216 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
i dont know. it's just what the last owner told me before i bought it. he didn't really elabotate just that he had "the problem" and thought it a good opportunity to upgrade it. probably as he was trying to sell his car lol.

Adrian W

15,493 posts

257 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
jimbooo said:
my 2.5 had the ecu problem so the last owner added an aftermarket one. I have a certificate to verify 350bhp. It is boosting to 1.2 bar at the moment which is probably why i'm splitting manifolds by the week. I'm going to get it on a rolling road asap to see what is actually going. on. It also has the 3r front clam so basically is just like a gto 3 but with more boost and less engine lol
The reason your car is cracking manifolds has nothing to do with boost pressure, it is due to engine rock and the weight of the turbo's hanging on the end of the manifold. The later braced ones are a bit better, however the way to eliminate this design fault would be to devise a support for the Turbo.

Gadgeroonie

5,362 posts

265 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
Gadgeroonie said:
the 2.5 has less power but revs better

they can be tuned to go better than the 3.0 also
You might need to explain that one?
a standard 3.0

mgbond

6,749 posts

261 months

Saturday 13th December 2008
quotequote all
jimbooo said:
my 2.5 had the ecu problem so the last owner added an aftermarket one. I have a certificate to verify 350bhp. It is boosting to 1.2 bar at the moment which is probably why i'm splitting manifolds by the week. I'm going to get it on a rolling road asap to see what is actually going. on. It also has the 3r front clam so basically is just like a gto 3 but with more boost and less engine lol


I would get it on the rollers again, I have an after market ECU on mine boosting at 0.8 I'm hitting 340 on std exhaust. Just about to get it back after some fiddling and variable boost controler fitted to run it from 0.6 to 1bar. I wouldn't like to run that eninge (unless strengthened) on 1.2bar, sounds a bit high.

Bondy

NobleGuy

7,133 posts

244 months

Monday 15th December 2008
quotequote all
I crashed my first noble, a 2.5, and replaced it with a 3.0.
It might have just been in my head but the 3.0 did seem significantly quicker.