X3 - are they that bad?
X3 - are they that bad?
Author
Discussion

alfaspiderman2

Original Poster:

1,136 posts

249 months

Sunday 21st December 2008
quotequote all
I'll be handing back my company 5 Series Touring next month and started looking at replacements for the family car.

I've set a budget of circa £15k and am tossing up between another 5 Touring or perhaps a 3 Touring. But I can't help but notice what tremendous value X3s are.

I know the image of these things, especially in the current climate, is hammering their residuals but are they actually a bad a car in 3.0 diesel guise?

I can live with the image for an X3 3.0SD for the price of a 320d if they're any good.

skeeterm5

4,587 posts

218 months

Sunday 21st December 2008
quotequote all
I had one as a loan car while mine was in the dealers for a software upgrade. When I returned it I actually asked the salesman if people actually buy them with their own money......

I thought the drive was terrible, the gearbox felt just like the one in a ford transit with a long and vague action.

Acceleration was poor the ride choppy and the interior quality (cloth) dreadful.

So if you asked me there is a good reason they look good value.............

S

dubbs

1,599 posts

314 months

Sunday 21st December 2008
quotequote all
Was in the market for one of these as a car for the missus.... end up with a 57 plate CRV instead which is really good if you like that type of "soft-roader"



matt uk

18,084 posts

230 months

Sunday 21st December 2008
quotequote all
My BiL had one a few years back. Inside it looked like a BMW, but it didn't feel like a BMW - the build quality was ste. They may have got better though, I've not been in one since.

Also the packaging seemed odd - took up a fair bit of road but was far from spacious inside and the boot space was mean for a car this size. In the back it actually felt quite cramped. But again, I have no other experience of soft roaders, they may all be like this - so it might be class leading for all I know.

SJobson

13,833 posts

294 months

Sunday 21st December 2008
quotequote all
Do test drive one and report back - I'm still in the dark as to whether the 3.0sd might be a hidden gem.

A friend who had a pre-facelift 2.0d MSport for 3 years preferred it to his current E93 320Ci cabriolet. And the post-facelift X3s are supposed to be built much better. 280bhp, decent economy and 4wd in a car-sized, good-handling estate seems a great combination.

Not Ideal

3,057 posts

218 months

Monday 22nd December 2008
quotequote all
I think one of the worst cars bmw have ever built.

hughjayteens

2,029 posts

298 months

Monday 22nd December 2008
quotequote all
I had one for 2 years after 4 years of M3s and loved it! The early ones had questionable finishes, but I think the later ones, particularly 3.0D and 3.0SD are awesome cars. My wife has a CR-V and the X3 knocks the socks off it IMO.

Go and test drive one and see what you think - the SEs do ride better than the Sports due to the softer suspension setup, but the sport suspension was offered as a no cost delete option on later Sports so if you can find a 3.0SD MSport with SE suspension you should have the best of both worlds.

It drives every bit as well as an E46 and is far more practical.

Ignore your prejudices and try one for yourself! I'd have another in a flash.

NIIKME

562 posts

251 months

Monday 22nd December 2008
quotequote all
I almost cant believe what im reading. we just took delivery of an 08 2ltr d. brilliant car. and we tested the crv and it was... how can i put it... dog sh*te? the whole range has just had an engine upgrade and they are promoting their new 4wd system called xdrive so perhaps the facelift is an enormous improvement upon the early cars?

boxin

87 posts

247 months

Monday 22nd December 2008
quotequote all
We have owned a 3.0sd in se trim for over two years and 24.000 miles, it has returned 29.7mpg and only now needs a set of new tyres, we tow a trailer and even fully laden it pulls like a train, solo it makes a fine Q car. I do not like the pre face lift X3 the se looks like someones just dipped the car in a tub of chocolate and all the sport models inc face lift look like a smacked arse, this IMO of course. The sport suspension ruins the ride, go for a face lift SE with half leather and pan roof plus any other spec you might require, the six speed auto is also great. having said all that if you can find a 3.0sd for 15K you will be lucky, and if you do find one buy it. Yes the 3.0sd is a hidden gem.

Vlad.

1,086 posts

247 months

Monday 22nd December 2008
quotequote all
BAHN-STORMA said:
Never really saw the point of the X3, not much smaller/cheaper than the better equipped and better looking X5.

Someone else mentioned gearboxes - avoid manuals, automatic is the only way to go for these.
It is much narrower => fits into supermarket car parking spaces and you can open the doors.

dubbs

1,599 posts

314 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
hughjayteens said:
I had one for 2 years after 4 years of M3s and loved it! The early ones had questionable finishes, but I think the later ones, particularly 3.0D and 3.0SD are awesome cars. My wife has a CR-V and the X3 knocks the socks off it IMO.

Go and test drive one and see what you think - the SEs do ride better than the Sports due to the softer suspension setup, but the sport suspension was offered as a no cost delete option on later Sports so if you can find a 3.0SD MSport with SE suspension you should have the best of both worlds.

It drives every bit as well as an E46 and is far more practical.

Ignore your prejudices and try one for yourself! I'd have another in a flash.
Is that the latest CRV? We've got the latest one and when comparing the two prior to purchase I really couldn't find a reason to put the X3 over it... the ride in the X3 was absolutely awful and interior trim naff. Only think it had in favour was being a better looking car externally but even then we bought the top spec CRV and that looks quite nice with the decent sized alloys,etc.,

noumenon

1,282 posts

234 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
BAHN-STORMA said:
Never really saw the point of the X3, not much smaller/cheaper than the better equipped and better looking X5.

Someone else mentioned gearboxes - avoid manuals, automatic is the only way to go for these.
+1

Deva Link

26,934 posts

275 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Honda's 2.2 diesel engine is pretty good but it's not available as auto on CRV - if it was I'm sure they'd sell loads of them. They've just released an auto diesel Accord so maybe there will be one eventually.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

259 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
i drove a 2.0 Diesel X3 from Austria to Newcastle - in a nutshell it was fine - im not a fan of soft roaders, but it was quiet, comfortable, and did over 120mph on the autobahn with no issues..

i wouldnt buy one, but if its your thing its a perfectly acceptable form of transport.

Russell B

847 posts

255 months

Saturday 27th December 2008
quotequote all
As per usual there are going to be lots of negative comments from those who have never owned one of these cars let alone driven one. As usual the people who really know and are the ones who have owned one and it seems they are well regarded. We had a 2004 2.0 d m sport and it was brilliant. Ive been in a fortunate position to have had many BMW's and this stands out as one of the best we have had so drive one and ignore the mindless tw@ts on here.

Let us know what u think

Edited by Russell B on Saturday 27th December 14:48

Russell B

847 posts

255 months

Saturday 27th December 2008
quotequote all
BAHN-STORMA said:
Russell B said:
mindless tw@ts on here.
Just summed yourself up - no need for such comments... rolleyes
BAHN-STORMA sorry if I caused offence but it is true that there is alot of twoddle spoke on from time to time on here by people who do not have much experience of the topic in hand.



Fox-

13,575 posts

276 months

Saturday 27th December 2008
quotequote all
I was most dissapionted when I was given one of these horrific things as a loan car.

Except... it turned out not to be horrific at all. I'd never buy one but I really rather liked it. The build felt fine, the interior was a curious mix of new-style BMW and E46, the ride was nice, the autbox suited the 2.0 diesel engine..... it was fine.

tomTVR

6,909 posts

271 months

Saturday 27th December 2008
quotequote all
They arent that bad at all, my dad has had two - both 6 cylinder petrols. Not bad looking with the sport bumpers and on the road as you would expect for a BMW they are excellent. Nice and roomy inside and the slightly higher driving position helps.

Only bad thing was the ride comfort on the sport model, with runflats it is totally, totally unacceptable.

scottbm

105 posts

217 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
it will be much smaller than the 5 series touring. I had a X3 for a week and gave it back. Now have the X5 which is a fantastic car. Not a very big boot though compared to my wife`s 325 touring. X5 seems twice the car but for the same price. You can pick them up very cheap now!!!!

Good time to be buying a car

good luck

hughjayteens

2,029 posts

298 months

Monday 29th December 2008
quotequote all
tomTVR said:
Only bad thing was the ride comfort on the sport model, with runflats it is totally, totally unacceptable.
Pretty sure X3s have never had runflats (mine certainly didn't)